Daylight-saving time was enacted as an energy-saving measure, but when time springs forward on March 9, people may actually use more energy, says a new study. When all of Indiana began to participate in daylight-saving time -- before 2006, only 15 of the state's 92 counties would spring forward and fall back -- researchers at the University of California-Santa Barbara started tracking Hoosiers' energy bills. The result: Indiana households paid an extra $8.6 million annually for electricity after the switch, likely due to increased air-conditioner use. Critics say that Indiana's situation might not apply nationwide. Besides, says Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who drafted a daylight-saving-time extension that went into effect last year, other studies have concluded that extra evening light means "less crime, fewer traffic fatalities, more recreation time, and increased economic activity."
source: The Wall Street Journal
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Comments
View as Threaded
Boyscientist Posted 6:51 am
27 Feb 2008
same time frame as their neighbors.
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 11:37 am
27 Feb 2008
The electric light has done a lot for mankind, but in today's world, where goods are plentiful, it principly seems to let people stay out late.
Sure, for some the benefits of clubbing and discos are obvious, but really, does the whole world have to be switched on 24/7?
How about we all agree that you can just as easily shop on Saturday as on Sunday...and that 11pm for supermarkets is good enough to satisfy the most ravenous 20 year old working up late working on the latest social network.
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 1:11 pm
27 Feb 2008
Permalink
Boyscientist Posted 10:48 pm
27 Feb 2008
Most equatorial countries do not change as there is no benefit for them.
Economic advantages appear to rule under present day conditions. Shopping Malls, golf courses and service industry thrive under DST.
Permalink