Thus spake Zara-Gore-a ...

Gore embraces 350 ppm target at Poznan 1

[This post is from Bill McKibben in Poland. For background on the science behind the 350 target and the challenge it poses see here and here.]

Al Gore gave the international climate talks in Poznan a new set of marching orders this afternoon, declaring that old targets for fighting global warming had been made obsolete by new science and that 350 parts per million co2 was the new standard for which the world must aim.

"Even a goal of 450 parts per million, which seems so difficult today, is inadequate," said Gore, adding we "need to toughen that goal to 350 parts per million."

The number itself is less than a year old -- NASA scientist James Hansen first set it as a goal in a scientific paper last winter. But in the months since, a global effort led by 350.org has spread the goal with rallies and demonstrations on every continent.

"Our efforts reached a new level this afternoon, when Al Gore changed the decade-old goal for a new climate agreement," said 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben. "The world now has a new target, one that negotiators must figure out how to meet by next year in Copenhagen if those talks are to be a success."

350.org also used the occasion to announce an international day of action to spread the number next October 24, with events planned from high in the Himalayas to undersea on the Great Barrier Reef. "We need to take this movement for survival to the farthest reaches of the planet," said Ely Katembo, 350.org organizer from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. "We're talking to everyone, from wired teenagers in Europe to Masaii tribesman on the plains of Kenya."

The response to Gore's remarks highlighted growing international acceptance of the goal -- his call for a 350 target drew the longest applause of his speech.

"Actions are already streaming into the 350.org website from Norway, Korea, Ecuador, and more" says Jon Warnow, web strategist for the project. "16 years ago, when the Kyoto protocol was debated, this sort of campaign wouldn't have been possible. Now, with the internet, we have the tools we need to organize at the scale of the problem we face."

A variety of international voices spoke out in support of 350.org's call to action. International human rights icon, Desmond Tutu, called the campaign, "an effective way to take action to turn around the climate crisis." Leading United Kingdom environmental author, George Monbiot wrote, "This is a great initiative, which all those who care about the future of humanity should support." More "350 Messengers" are displayed on the 350.org website.

"A year ago, nobody had ever heard of 350. But it turns out it's the most important number on the planet," said McKibben. "If people around the world know nothing else about global warming, we need them to understand that 350 represents a kind of safety -- if we can get that message across, then they'll demand dramatic action from their leaders."

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Pangolin's avatar

    Pangolin Posted 11:08 am
    12 Dec 2008

    That's negative net emissions.Meaning that all the talks about reductions of emissions by 10%-30% by 2020 or 80% by 2050 are just so much hot air. (sorry) That amounts to no cars, no aircraft, no trains and no industry emitting greenhouse gases. Agriculture and shipping would need to convert as fast as possible from fossil fuels but starvation shouldn't be an option.
    At the same time tens of thousands of test plots would have to be planted and monitored to understand the effects of biochar on specific crops. Then we need another ten or twelve ways of increasing the mineralization of atmospheric and oceanic CO2.
    And still we're going to be too late to prevent massive climate change effects. Doomers are optimists.

    Put the Carbon Back

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement