This week in ocean news

European fisheries ‘poor,’ island nation Palau rich in corals 8

Stakes in the seas are high, but in at least one case, an interest in ocean health can lead to cooperation between unlikely teammates ...

... the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution held an international conference on the possibility of mitigating global warming by seeding the ocean with iron, a controversial procedure which would theoretically boost phytoplankton populations ...

... meanwhile, the scientist behind the theory that the earth is a living organism suggested installing a series of giant pipes in the oceans to circulate water, creating algae blooms, under the theory that the algae would consume carbon dioxide and promote cloud production ...

... a corals watchdog group said that just five percent of Philippine coral reefs are still in pristine condition due to overfishing and coral bleaching ...

... the island nation of Palau was noted for its conservation efforts, which fueled tourism, as its coral reefs are among the best in the world for diving ...

... a leaked internal report prepared for the European Union by outside experts called European fisheries "poor," with one author noting that the last 25 years had seen "an unparalleled period of decline" ...

... Israelis and Jordanians joined forces to build an artificial reef in the Red Sea ...

... a Russian engineering firm launched satellite monitoring of a bay where oil is harvested, and which is also the home to grey whales, among the rarest creatures on earth with just 100 to 300 estimated left in the western Pacific ...

... four Philippine fishing ships were caught poaching in Indonesian waters ...

... the Sierra Leone patrol navy stymied an attempted raid on two Chinese fishing ships by eight armed Guinean pirates ...

... the British government expressed interest in expanding its claims on the ocean surrounding the Falkland Islands from a 200-mile perimeter to 350 miles. An international boundaries researcher said, "Some states might ask why a big power is entitled to huge stretches of the ocean's resources thousands of miles away from its land, but that's the way the laws" ...

... scientists at the University of Arizona created maps that displayed what landmass would be flooded by a one-meter rise in sea levels, noting that it would inundate many American historic sites ...

... and the Bangladeshi head of state said a one-meter rise would displace 25 to 30 million of the low-lying country's population, calling it "climate Armageddon" ...

... a new U.S. federal report on sea turtles found that, despite gains in the 1990s, the loggerhead population was now declining ...

... the New England Fisheries Management Council voted to protect habitat for juvenile Atlantic cod in 4,500 acres near Plymouth, Mass ...

... a third dead blue whale was found floating off the coast of southern California in two weeks ...

... and Oceana was named a charity that "deserves your dollars" by business forecaster Kiplinger.

Andrew Sharpless is the CEO of Oceana, the world’s largest international nonprofit dedicated to ocean conservation. Visit www.oceana.org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Earth Shaman Posted 5:08 pm
    29 Sep 2007

    Fish ReportIts good to see others paying attention to our oceans plight.The real story to bite into that is causal to our oceans problems starts with the story of the find in Norways waters of the German submarine in late 2006 that was found in 500 feet of water with "55 TONS" of mercury in flasks destined for Japan to make mercury gas explosions.The British archives told of "30" other mercury ship missions that had already been worked on. The british have known since they broke the cable codes between the Germans and Japanese that lead to the downing of that particular sub,with technicians onboard to teach the Japanese how to use the mercury against the allies. With over 30 missions that have been worked on and approximately 20 more to go,and the knowledge that the warnings for mercury in fish have now encompassed most fields of fish,does it not make you wonder just whos in charge and why the problem has not been "Marshall Planned" Children born in Greenland were having so many problems with genetics and intellect from ingestion by their mothers of whale meat ,a scientist from Harvard started a program of information that has helped. Whales are so stupid these days fronm the mercury destroying their intellect they beach themselves and swim up rivers in confusion.Its a serious and sad thing that the off planet assistance of Germany that taught them about mercury explosions during the war has destroyed our oceans and not many are paying attention to the root cause of our oceans plight. This old Papa is a sad old Papa,because it may be too late,all of those aluminum flasks have not corroded through yet and released their cargo. The foolish people"Read Scientists" that have determined that just a sand and rocks cover up in the Norway case(As they did in the 30 other missions,that I know about) is sufficient. AND THE TERRIBLE THING is that it is only 500 feet of water that the U boat sits in 2 pieces.If you folks knew the grid science as I do,and understand ocean vents and herniations of the ocean floor,you would know that they have commited to continue the genocide of our oceans.I can only assume that it was a conscious decision to do so. Anyone care to prove me wrong.??

    Earth Shaman
  2. Sam Wells Posted 10:11 am
    30 Sep 2007

    Not really...After WWI and WWII large military and merchant marine ships were sunk all over the world, all containing toxic material.  Lewisite, a highly toxic blistering agent was sunk on huge ships off the Bahamas and dumped into the Gulf of Mexico.  Mustard gas and God knows what, it was dumped until the 1970's with NEPA and all that.
    As to mercury, I'd like to clarify to say that elemental mercury is actually fairly stable - it is methyl mercury that is the problem (mercury fume or "Mad Hatter's Disease" does not exist in aquatic environments).  Methyl mercury is an industrial  by-product (acetaldehyde production) as well as associated with COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS.  
    I'm not going to say flasks of mercury in the ocean are good or bad, but that coal power plants, drill rigs, industrial dumping, and other sources of methyl mercury are much more effective in bio-accumulation of marine species, bottom to top.

    Onward through the fog
  3. caniscandida Posted 3:20 pm
    30 Sep 2007

    reefs in Red Sea, Palau; cod off Cape Cod

    It is good news, apparently, that the joint Israeli-Jordanian project to construct solid foundations for coral reefs in the Gulf of Aqaba has had initial success.  "Build it, and they will come!," "they" in this case being the corals, fish and other organisms that make up a reef ecosystem.  (Though we shall have to wait and see if what might be a global problem facing all coral reefs presents itself there too.)  To say nothing of the human side of the story: it is always swell, and far too rare, to see Israelis cooperating with Arab neighbors on something positive and peaceful having nothing to do with any of the region's sources of conflict.
    As for diving and coral-reef-watching in the waters off Palau, sorry to sound reverse-snobbish, anti-travel, anti-hedonist and anti-sensationalist, but I cannot see how all that air travel is justified for that single destination.  Now, if the stop in Palau were just part of a South Seas/Southeast Asian itinerary, featuring a number of sites of naturalist, scientific, aesthetic and cultural interest, then that would be another story.
    The area designated as a marine reserve for hatchling and juvenile cod, at the New England Fisheries Management Council meeting in Plymouth, MA, is not near Plymouth itself, but is around a seafloor channel between Cape Cod and the Georges Bank, which is some distance out in the Atlantic.  If you draw a line ESE from Boston, and another line SW from Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, where they intersect is close to the center of the Georges Bank.
    Or, really, 3a. It is a pity that in this case, the fishermen and their allies are opposed to the designation of the reserve -- which of course was explained and supported by Oceana among others -- , and claim that the borders of the area were not determined with a sound scientific basis.



    Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
  4. Colin Wright Posted 6:26 pm
    30 Sep 2007

    Saerching for the magic elixir...Thanks Andrew. Particularly interested in a follow-up to the Woods Hole conference on iron-seeding, and any more details anyone has about the Lovelock idea. How many of these tubes is he talking about? How would wave action bring up deep water? I'm suspicious enough DMS could be generated to create substantial cloud cover.
    I'm always been suspicious of the geo-technical engineering ideas, mainly because they would just provide cover for people to go on polluting as before. But I'm starting to feel desperate enough to consider them as stop-gap measures along with massive carbon abatement.
  5. suzannah Posted 1:41 am
    02 Oct 2007

    for Colin-Hi, Suzannah from Oceana here. You can find more info on Lovelock's giant tubes plan in this Nature story. It's wacky stuff.
  6. Colin Wright Posted 6:39 am
    04 Oct 2007

    More on Lovelock's idea ...Thanks Suzannah! That site required a fee, but you did encourage me to search and find this on National Geographic.
    There I found out that the tubes are about 10 m in diameter with a one-way valve. Tens of thousands are envisioned. But critics have pointed out that the tubes could end up releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere. We will have to wait for more study.
    I wonder why you just couldn't sprinkle the DMS cloud seeder on the ocean surface?
  7. suzannah Posted 11:51 pm
    04 Oct 2007

    seems too complicated to me...Just doesn't seem efficient or realistic to undertake. I don't know why you couldn't just put DMS on the surfacem, but there must be a good reason.
    My favorite fantastic climate change idea is the one where we launch trillions of tiny mirrored satellites to block a small percentage of the sun's rays. Compared to the giant ocean tubes, it's simpler, less invasive and seems less likely to mess up a the earth's largest ecosystem.
  8. amazingdrx Posted 1:14 am
    05 Oct 2007

    YikesA great example of orgs that fiddle while the earth burns.  Gaia crisps anyone?  made from the real living planet!!
    "the scientist behind the theory that the earth is a living organism"
    Please don't lend this nuclear power proponent any credibility.   He deserves recognition for his idiotic support of nuclear power everytime his traitorous name is mentioned.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement