There are sound physical reasons why the three main contenders for the energy supply for transport turn out to be the three electron economies: renewables, nuclear, and coal CCS. We have determined there that electric drive vehicles either attached to the grid or powered by some version of a battery can do most of the on-land transport tasks now dependent on oil supplies. There are other reasons why electricity is valuable for driving stationary machinery as well, which we will go into later.
Why then is electricity preferable to biofuels, hydrogen, and coal-to-liquids? In addition to zero emissions at end use, electricity has benefits in efficiency and availability in almost all stages of its production, transmission, and consumption. Electric generators can be built to use a wide variety of types of energy (heat, light, mechanical energy) to create the highly usable and flexible energy carrier, electric current. In other words, electricity is the ultimate in "flex-fuel." All renewable energies (wind, sun, geothermal heat, wave, tidal, biomass, natural chemical, and thermal gradients ) can be converted into electricity with existing technologies. In addition, while we must shift the way we generate electricity in most instances, this is not a full-scale rebuilding of our energy system, but a modification of existing infrastructure -- so in the end, less expensive.
Existing electrical generation technologies convert a fairly large amount of the primary energy they receive into electric energy. Current solar panels, for instance, can convert anywhere from 10 percent to 40 percent of the energy of the sun into electricity, depending on the technology; by contrast, plants convert at most 1 percent of the energy of the sun into biomass, an energy harvest that is further reduced if that biomass is converted into a liquid biofuel rather than burned in a biomass electric generation facility.
Additionally, electric motors, because of the physics of the electromagnetic force, are incredibly efficient at generating torque, the useful product of engines and motors. An electric motor of medium or larger size (90-95 percent efficient) requires somewhere between one-third and one-quarter the amount of energy to do the same work as an internal combustion engine (20-30 percent efficient). They therefore generate 3 to 4 times more torque per unit energy input than all but the largest and most efficient house-sized diesel ship engines (50 percent efficient).
Electricity can also be used for a huge variety of functions for the end user: generating mechanical movement, heat, light, and sound. So electricity is both flex-fuel and flex-use. It is no wonder that, even with no consideration of current energy and climate concerns, more and more devices have been designed with more electronic components to increase their functionality, including petroleum powered automobiles (electronic fuel injection, stability control, drive by wire, etc.).
Electricity's weakness has been that electrical energy storage is bulky and heavy in comparison to the portable liquid fuels to which it is often compared. Batteries and ultracapacitors are still relatively large and expensive compared to a liquid fuel tank and the hydrocarbons that are pumped into it. As the drawbacks of fossil fuels are starting to be more widely recognized, the positive attributes of alternatives are once again being recognized. Also, substantial investment is once again flowing into resolving this one final hitch in electricity's otherwise near-ideal attributes -- and the technological development curve promises rapid advances.
In the distant future, we may have other energy carriers with more favorable characteristics, but for the foreseeable future it makes the most sense to build on the advantages of electricity.
Next up: the best way to generate electricity.
Environmental education in Guinea Bissau
Comments
View as Threaded
Delay And Deny Posted 1:29 am
22 Aug 2008
They love electric cars, and hybrids, because their masters (the wind-solar combine) will profit mightily.
They hate hydrogen because it reduces demand for solar panels and wind turbines and reduces dependence on electricity from the grid. It encourages independence and delivers more wealth to the people, so the Greens don't like hydrogen.
Permalink
vakibs Posted 1:53 am
22 Aug 2008
Like the solitary electron which revolves around the Hydrogen nucleus, jabailo keeps revolving around the topic. Which direction of spin do you have, jabailo ?
Is it true that we cannot know your velocity and momentum at the same time ?
Are you a particle or a wave, jabailo ?
A grist without jabailo will not be a happy grist.
Let's think in terms of eco-dollars.
Permalink
sunflower Posted 2:58 am
22 Aug 2008
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:22 am
22 Aug 2008
How hydrogen would reduce the demand for solar and wind is beyond me. But then, I'm not all that bright.
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
Jonas Posted 7:36 am
22 Aug 2008
For example, it is very difficult to co-fire large amounts of biomass with coal - 5 to 10% seems to be a practical limit. The wet dream of the renewable energy sector would be to find a way to replace all coal in existing coal plants.
And voilà, some smart scientists have already come up with a technology capable of doing so. It's called torrefaction, a highly efficient conversion and densification process which results in a renewable fuel that can replace 100% of coal in existing infrastructures (not only the boilers, but the entire existing logistical, storage and processing infrastructures can be used).
So all the anti-renewables talk based on the idea that there are no cost-effective or efficient baseloads, are nonsensical. It's perfectly feasible to create such green baseloads, which can serve to make the intermittent renewables independent of coal and gas.
Permalink
Michael Hoexter Posted 3:35 pm
22 Aug 2008
I'm surprised that there are people still out there (posting on this blog) with this lack of understanding of how hydrogen works.
The hydrogen that is available now is mostly a byproduct of the oil refining process and is such not very "clean".
Permalink
MAD MAC Posted 9:11 pm
25 Aug 2008
Victory in Pattani
Permalink