Steve Clemons makes a point worth repeating -- if you're worried about "psychological effects" on oil speculators, perhaps a better strategy than hyping offshore drilling is dialing back the warmongering rhetoric toward Iran.
The ‘psychological effects’ of threatening war with Iran 2
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
Erik Hoffner Posted 4:43 am
06 Aug 2008
"Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has revealed the Bush administration recently held a meeting in Vice President Cheney's office to discuss ways to provoke a war with Iran. Hersh said it was considered during the meeting to stage an incident where it would appear that Iranian boats had attacked US forces in the Straits of Hormuz.
Seymour Hersh: "There was a dozen ideas proffered how to trigger a war. The one that interested me the most was, why don't we build--we, in our shipyard--build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats, put Navy Seals on them with a lot of arms, and, the next time one of our boats goes through the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. Might cost some lives. And it was rejected, because you can't have Americans killing Americans. But that's the kind of--that's the level of stuff we are talking about: provocation. But that was rejected."
Seymour Hersh discussed the report during a recent interview at the Campus Progress journalism conference."
- Democracy Now, Aug 1
Not even an original idea. It's like they think that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was never reported on. Incredible.
Erik
The Orion Grassroots Network: supporting grassroots groups working for conservation, justice, & more
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 10:18 am
06 Aug 2008
Permalink