Reducing our contribution to global warming may be expensive. Global warming itself, however, is likely to be much more expensive.
Supporting that last claim is a new report, the most definitive look to date at the economic impacts of climate change on Washington. (There's a shorter one for Oregon (PDF), published in 2005.)
I thought this lede from the Seattle Times was a great summary:
A warming climate could cost Washington governments and businesses tens of millions of dollars every year in drought-stricken crops, forest fires and tightened water supplies, according to a new state study.
It is the first such analysis illuminating how rising temperatures and shifting snow patterns could ripple through the economy.
Yakima Valley farmers could experience more crop losses as snowpack declines. Forest fires could double in size, driving up the costs of fighting them and hurting tourism. Dairies in Whatcom County might produce less milk. Cities, including Seattle, could spend millions more on water conservation or expand their water-storage dams. More than 50 square miles of Washington land could wind up underwater if sea levels rise two feet.
More media coverage here and here.
One of the report's primary authors is Yoram Bauman, a PhD economist and longtime Sightline Institute associate. I contributed to the report in a small advisory capacity.
Comments
View as Threaded
Zarkov Posted 8:14 am
11 Jan 2007
From my science, droughts would be the least likely outcome, because as the seas get warmer then water evaporation increases, which leads to more clouds, rather than less clouds, which cools and brings rain. Show me how a 1C temperature rise can "bake the ground dry".
This is show down time..... because I will be out of here shortly.
It seems the carbon dioxide proponents are changing their story day by day to fit the unfolding observations. This is not science, if anything this is total BS. The science should predict the unfolding events, ACCURATELY, you can not afford a hit and miss approach. If anything, the CO2 model has been shown to be false by the unfolding situation and can no longer be tenetable.
If this is the case you guys are in real trouble.
Y'all are in real trouble anyway, IMO, and no one has realised yet just what are the real and expected consequences of an oil film on the seas.
If you don't accurately identify what is causing the climate shift, you won't be able to find a remedy,
BUT more importantly you can not determine when the tipping point will occur, at which point from then on nothing can be done. Oh, you might have a foul tasting drink of something like cool clean fresh water, but where will the water come from to quench the parched land?
IMO the tipping point passed several years ago, despite my loud and ?clear protestations, the climate just ignored me and so did the policy makers, LOL. Your call now.
Permalink
Eric de Place Posted 8:49 am
11 Jan 2007
I'll use small words so that maybe you can follow along. The impacts of global climate change vary considerably by region. It is fairly straightforward to predict global temperature changes, but much harder to predict regional and local ones. (That's because global atmospheric systems are kinda sorta complicated.) And it is harder yet to figure out how local temperature changes impact conditions.
But luckily for us, there are some really big brains working on the problem including, in support of this report, the Climate Impacts Group at the University of Washington, which is one of the leading research organizations in the nation.
So to return to your semi-question, how can climate change induce drought? It's pretty obvious if you think about it. Lots of places--like the Pacific Northwest and a huge swath of Asia--depend on snowpack for water. When the temperature goes up, the snow melts and also precip falls as rain instead of snow. So it's very possible for climate change to bring both more flooding (especially in the winter and spring) and more drought (especially in the summer and fall).
Permalink
wackatalpidae Posted 9:08 am
11 Jan 2007
This nifty map show's that the average global temperature of our little planet generally does not exceed a very balmy 22C...
http://www.scotese.com/images/globaltemp.jpg
Granted, that is about 10C higher than it is today, but perhaps our species should just get used to this sort of fluctuation. If we survive long enough, we'll encounter it eventually.
heheheheh
Permalink
alienbuddha Posted 10:14 am
11 Jan 2007
BE NOT AFRAID!
http://thewizardofarmageddon.blogspot.com/
Permalink
Steven T Posted 10:44 am
11 Jan 2007
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 11:29 am
11 Jan 2007
(Don't worry, Steven T, I won't let it get out of hand. Now tell me, have you accepted Galacto as your lord and savior?)
www.grist.org
Permalink
Zarkov Posted 3:04 pm
11 Jan 2007
OK, so what is snow ?
frozen rain (in a sense)
Therefore if no snow melt then rain falls from the sky instead.
As reported to me 20 years ago, the snow failed in Switzerland, but it still rained.
And what explanations do you have for places where it used to rain, but no more. Sorry you excuses do not cut with me, I am a hard headed scientist.
Forget the small meaningless words, please reply to the question in scientific terms, I can take it.
Ta.
Permalink
jaybor Posted 6:50 pm
11 Jan 2007
Permalink
KathyF Posted 7:27 pm
11 Jan 2007
Another anomaly: If the Gulf Stream quits, it may very well be a deep freeze here in Northern Europe, while the rest of the world bakes.
Permalink
buildgreeninc Posted 3:14 am
12 Jan 2007
If you live in the NY, NJ, CT area and are interested rennovating your home to reduce your dependency on energy, water, and toxic materials please stop by and check us out at http://www.buildgreeninc.com.
Thanks,
Build Green Inc - NY, CT: Residential building & renovation. Environmentally responsible homes.
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
//
var l=new Array();
var output = '';
l[0]='>';l[1]='a';l[2]='/';l[3]='';l[28]='\"';l[29]=' 109';l[30]=' 111';l[31]=' 99';l[32]=' 46';l[33]=' 99';l[34]=' 110';l[35]=' 105';l[36]=' 110';l[37]=' 101';l[38]=' 101';l[39]=' 114';l[40]=' 103';l[41]=' 100';l[42]=' 108';l[43]=' 105';l[44]=' 117';l[45]=' 98';l[46]=' 64';l[47]=' 110';l[48]=' 111';l[49]=' 115';l[50]=' 97';l[51]=' 74';l[52]=':';l[53]='o';l[54]='t';l[55]='l';l[56]='i';l[57]='a';l[58]='m';l[59]='\"';l[60]='=';l[61]='f';l[62]='e';l[63]='r';l[64]='h';l[65]='a ';l[66]='
Permalink
Zarkov Posted 7:26 am
12 Jan 2007
All the Northern Hemisphere, is in transition from their normal climate to deserts, no snow is the first sign, then no winter rains, then....
We have gone through all that down under, and now people are realising that all is not well...even in Finland.
Ta
Permalink