The Bush administration: Bringing you third-party scientific reviews from online roleplaying pals

You have to read this to believe it 5

On Wednesday, the Inspector General's office at the Department of Interior released a report showing that a Bush appointee who lacked any background in natural science had "bullied, insulted, and harassed the professional staff of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to change documents and alter biological reporting regarding the Endangered Species Program." She had been "heavily involved with editing, commenting on, and reshaping ... scientific reports from the field."

This all sounds familiar, of course. Shades of Philip Cooney. Shades of Steven Griles. Hack Bush appointees corrupting the scientific process for ideological ends. This is a particularly ham-handed example, but ho hum, right?

But wait. The investigation also turned up evidence that the same appointee had "disclosed nonpublic information to private sector sources." A closer look at the report (PDF) reveals that this particular appointee -- Assistant Secretary of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Julie MacDonald --was a truly ... special case.

I direct your attention to a remarkable passage on p. 21. Keep in mind that being discussed here are scientific documents, and that it is illegal to share these documents with people outside the agency (bolding of text is mine):

MacDonald confirmed that she also sent the Delta Smelt document [about a controversial endangered species in Northern Calif.] to an on-line game friend through his father's e-mail account. MacDonald said she is acquainted with the on-line friend through internet role-playing games. She said she engages in these games to relieve the stress created by her job; however, she said she has not played while at work. When asked why she would e-mail an internal DOI document to a private citizen, MacDonald replied, "I was irritated [with what was happening regarding the subject of the document] and tried to explain my irritation over the phone; however, I sent it to him to read for a better understanding."

Agent's Note: The on-line game friend is not professionally or personally affiliated with DOI or any of its entities. MacDonald continues to play games on the internet with the on-line friend; however, she has not sent any internal DOI information to him since her first interview last summer.

Yup, she sent an internal DOI scientific review document to a roleplaying buddy she met online -- through the buddy's dad -- for "better understanding." She said she "likes to have third party reviews of these documents," don't you know. I'm sure Fraggerz0952 will issue some perceptive scientific judgments from his parents' basement.

Trust me that this is the tip of the iceberg. You really should read the whole report. Here's another nice bit:

MacDonald admitted to sending "Watershed proposed draft rule by the EPA: proposal of a new framework for accomplishing the water quality planning and management provisions of the Clean Water Act" via government e-mail to a personal friend, whose e-mail address ended in chevrontexaco.com. She said she did not remember why she sent the document as an attachment to the friend but stated, "It probably wasn't releasable." When MacDonald was questioned about the second e-mail, containing a large EPA file, sent to another e-mail address ending in chevrontexaco.com, MacDonald could not recall whom this e-mail address belonged to.

A "personal friend" indeed. She also (illegally) shared confidential agency documents with "personal friends" that included an attorney at the right-wing Pacific Legal Foundation and lobbyists at the California Farm Bureau and Building Industry Association of Southern California. She loves her some third-party reviews!

Astonishing. As always, when we see an up-close example of the pervasive corruption in the Bush administration, our question should be: what are we not seeing?

Can you imagine?

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. econpolyeco Posted 8:10 am
    30 Mar 2007

    UghI think I'm going to be sick.  This is what happens when there is no fear of punishment.  Just spout a few "I don't recall Senators" at your hearing then sit back and wait for the book deal.
  2. plum Posted 12:19 pm
    30 Mar 2007

    plumEthics. The concept is lost on these people, because ethics is fundamentally process-driven, and they don't seem well-equipped to think in process terms.
  3. Benny Big Eye Posted 2:31 pm
    30 Mar 2007

    Julia MacDonald AKA, nightelfI wonder if MacDonald turned over the internal document to her teenage gaming partner for a Bloodmaw Magus Blade. They normally go for 17 gold pieces.

    Benny Big Eye
  4. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 3:28 am
    31 Mar 2007

    "I Have a Masters Degree...in SCIENCE"Look, all it takes for these Interior department "scientists" to get a job is a B.S. degree from State U.   They are no more qualified to do research, or even judge research papers, than GW himself.
    I think the government is right to limit the ability of these "wizards" to turn to punditry to enhance their bureaucratic positions.

    The Texeme Construct offers international text memetics construction and textcasting services. http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com
  5. Sam Wells Posted 4:44 am
    31 Mar 2007

    Balance of Policy and TeckieJabailo has a good point in that what comes out of the state and federal governments, especially environmental, is a balance between "the best possible science" and policy, which supposedly is founded on using "the best possible science."  The policy people get to adequately fund the science they want to pursue, so it ends up being a two-way street, call it a co-dependency if you must.  
    The pendulum swings both ways.  Sometimes the activist scientists go too far and get smacked down.  In some cases the policy managers go too far and get smacked down too.  
    The Bush Administration had quite a scandalous and heavy-handed approach to enphasize policy over science, but was recently smacked down by a federal judge (see NY Times science section today):
    "WASHINGTON, March 30 -- A federal judge in California on Friday overturned the Bush administration's revised rules for management of the country's 155 national forests, saying that the federal Forest Service violated the basic laws ensuring that forest ecosystems have environmental safeguards."  [copyright NYT, 2007]
    Ouch!
    I'd like to see if the implications of this ruling could also apply to FWS and NPS regulations of exactly the same ilk.  I'd like to see is there are ramifications for the inter-agency Climate Change group.  I don't expect an instant catharsis but yeah, the pendulum does seem to be swinging back to the left, slowly but surely.  /sammie

    Onward through the fog

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement