Retooling the way fisheries are managed could be the key to their long-term health, according to a new study published in the journal Science. Typical fisheries have mostly relied on a free-for-all style of management where scientists determine the overall allowable catch and then fishers go out and compete with each other to try to catch as much as they can as quickly as they can before an overall quota is met or exceeded in a given season. However, the study suggests that might not be the best way to keep fisheries healthy. Instead, it recommends a system of long-term individual quotas for each fisherperson that guarantees them access to a certain percentage of the aquatic bounty. "Under open access, you have a free-for-all race to fish, which ultimately leads to collapse," said Christopher Costello of the University of California at Santa Barbara. "But when you allocate shares of the catch, then there is an incentive to protect it." According to the study, allocating individual shares cuts in half the likelihood that a given fishery will collapse, especially if catch limits are set at responsible levels.
source: BBC News, Los Angeles Times, Associated Press, Reuters
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Comments
View as Flat
Wolverine Posted 2:47 am
20 Sep 2008
Permalink
naturescene Posted 2:06 am
22 Sep 2008
I believe you're overlooking the fact that this proposal is advocating a market-based system for fisheries, in which individuals are allocated quotas, but the quotas are transferable. In other words, it's a market-based cap-and-trade for fisheries.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Permalink
Antoinette Posted 2:07 am
22 Sep 2008
Permalink
naturescene Posted 4:22 am
22 Sep 2008
Permalink