Yo-ho-ho me fellow lovers of the briny deep. I realized just recently that me li'l column be runnin' for a whole year now. Remember that first arrrr-ticle? With the joking about poop decks and the promise to shiver ye timbers? (And speaking of that, we should get together soon, matey ...) How the time flies when ye be drinking rum!
But that be enough reminiscing for now. Let's move on to more recent headlines, like, oh, say, "Navy may deploy anti-terrorism dolphins." I kid ye not.
Dozens of dolphins and sea lions trained to detect and apprehend waterborne attackers could be sent to patrol a military base in Washington state, the Navy said [last month] ...
The base is home to submarines, ships and laboratories and is potentially vulnerable to attack by terrorist swimmers and scuba divers ...
Several options are under consideration, but the preferred plan would be to send as many as 30 California sea lions and Atlantic Bottlenose dolphins from the Navy's Marine Mammal Program, based in San Diego.
And what have the animals been trained to do when they come upon "terrorist swimmers and scuba divers"?:
When a Navy dolphin detects a person in the water, it drops a beacon. This tells a human interception team where to find the suspicious swimmer ...
Sea lions can carry in their mouths special cuffs attached to long ropes. If the animal finds a rogue swimmer, it can clamp the cuff around the person's leg. The individual can then be reeled in for questioning.
Rogue swimmers, consider ye selves warned!
In response to the "absurd" idea to bring the marine mammals to Puget Sound -- a body of water 10 degrees colder than the waters they are used to in San Diego and their native Gulf coast -- a group of Pacific NW activists has begun a knitting campaign. Much like the li'l old ladies knitting for oil-soaked penguins, the dolphin knitters are needling for news coverage and issue awareness by making sweaters, hats, and flipper mittens (flittens?).
Said one knitter when asked if it's all a joke, "We think it's more a tragic irony, and not nearly as ridiculous as the Navy believing they can transport and keep warm-water dolphins humanely alive in our frigid waters." I'll purl to that! (Har, har, arrr ... that be a knitting joke -- and yes, I be a stitch bitch! Why, I knit me own eye patch and peg-leg warmer.)
The group is asking supporters to bringing their knitting to one of the upcoming public meetings about the plan and/or to send comments directly to the Navy. Check out the Knitting for Dolphins website for more information.
Urban hawks take flight on New York’s Upper West Side
Frogs in the forest: the new canaries in the coal mine
Obama unveils ocean protection plan
Comments View as Flat
Sam Wells Posted 10:18 am
02 Mar 2007
Funny...
Sarah writes good, dripping with sarcasm as well. As somebody involved in bay dolphins in lower Texas, however, it was very disturbing. I know several wildlife permit holders down here that would almost have a stroke at the mere suggestion of using them for DHS anti-terror programs.
The males are worthless and the females are cranky when they have babies. The males just want to play and screw (um, making sense here?). The females travel in pods and take turns in protecting the babies from the randy males, sharks, and those insane Jet-skis. Both fight very rough and except for circus acts such as Sea World, are pretty much worthless for national defense.
I am not sure an otter, seal, or sea lion has more of a brain than a dog, and that suggestion seemed even more remote. But taken together, the proposal is ANIMAL ABUSE.
And when you write cute things like knitting warmies for dolphins, although you didn't mean it that way, that is also ANIMAL ABUSE.
If you or I did that kind of thing we'd be behind bars in some jail, wildlife permit or no. For the US Navy to even consider this is unconscionable.
/sammie
Onward through the fog
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 12:20 am
03 Mar 2007
will it work?, is it well done?
O dear Sam, surely you understand that Sarah v.S., one of whose many names-under-sail is Ironic Sal, is not seriously looking forward to seeing marine mammals fitted out in woolen wraps and mittens. Is it not clear that these knitters are performing a brilliant act of protest, on behalf of our cousins in the water?
On dolphin behavior: You clearly know a lot about the subject. It is one of the moral dangers of public aquariums, with shows of trained bottlenose dolphins and orcas, that generally we come to assume that those animals can be "taught tricks" in the same way as dogs. We should understand that there is no simple dividing line between "domesticable" and "wild," when we talk about non-human animals. Really, dolphins, including orcas, the largest dolphins, belong more on the "wild" side. But obviously, their intelligence and highly adaptable social nature (e.g., they are observed to hunt cooperatively with dolphins of other species) have led to their being able to negotiate certain prudent arrangements with their human captors; hence, they are frequently exhibited in aquarium shows. But that impressive level of cooperation should not be interpreted as their having been domesticated.
For bottlenose dolphins along the Pacific coast, Monterey is very much at the northern extreme, perhaps even beyond the northern extreme, of where they choose to live. So plunking them down in Puget Sound is surely a case of animal abuse.
As for the sea lions, fairly close cousins to dogs (unlike the dolphins and whales, who are ocean-going hippopotamuses), I am confused about their "educability." You, Sammie, write,"I am not sure an otter, seal, or sea lion has more of a brain than a dog, and that suggestion seemed even more remote. But taken together, the proposal is ANIMAL ABUSE."
Well, I am no expert, but it seems well established that all carnivores have to be smart, with regard to certain circumstances involving hunting and sociability. And wild carnivores are "smarter" than dogs -- but I am not sure "smarter" is quite the right word. (No offence meant, Little Dog.) Genetically, wolves and dogs are barely distinguishable; but wolves have larger brains. Doggy adaptations include a remarkable cooperativeness with the human beings who feed them, which of course wild carnivores tend to lack. But inasmuch as they depend on their society with humans, and their brilliance at reading human signals, they have lost the adaptiveness of wolves, and even more remarkably, of coyotes, to learning and interpreting all kinds of signals.
As for cats, I know too little about them at this point to comment. That they are generally able so successfully to mix cooperation with humans with a basic independence is amazing, and suggests a unique kind of intelligence.
Digressively, on cats, I recently saw, again, that African wildlife epic "Born Free." It was a great favorite of mine back in the 1960s. Forty years later, however, I was horrified: Elsa was wonderful, clearly (and so was the lioness-actress who took her part); but Joy Adamson deserved to be shackled in a dungeon. Ah, the poor Adamsons: weren't they both killed by lions? Talk about irony! ...
Anyway, back to sea lions: They too have been taught to do "tricks" in aquariums, so assuming that the reward system is in place, I do not doubt that they can do this cuffing "trick."
But how do they know if a swimmer or scuba diver is a "terrorist" or not?
Does Al-Qaeda have swimming pools at those reconstructed camps in Waziristan? Somehow, scuba diving does not seem the kind of tactic that would come to them naturally.
But of course, one should not underestimate them. In that case, though, would they not understand at this point that they must kill any dolphin or sea lion which approaches them? God forbid!
Did the dolphins and sea lions have explained to them what they were in for?
Chickens are our cousins! So are other sensitive animals! Enough is enough! No more factory farms!
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 4:38 am
03 Mar 2007
Arrr
I pray this yarn not be made of wool...
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink