Short-term, yes; solution, no

Gas tax revenue falling, feds seek to raid mass transit budget to pay for highways 2

From The New York Times:

Gasoline tax revenue is falling so fast that the federal government may not be able to meet its commitments to states for road projects already under way, the secretary of transportation said Monday.

The secretary, Mary E. Peters, said the short-term solution would be for the Highway Trust Fund's highway account to borrow money from the fund's mass transit account, a step that would balance the accounts as highway travel declines and use of mass transit increases. Both trends are being driven by the high price of gasoline and diesel fuel.

Got that? High gas prices are shifting people from cars into mass transit. The only appropriate response, clearly, is to rob the mass transit accounts to pay for highway projects.

Recall that when John McCain proposed his gas tax holiday, one of the many objections was that suspending the gas tax would divert funds from needed road and bridge repairs. Now, even without the holiday, the highway account is predicted to hit zero sometime in the next fiscal year, prompting administration officials to eye that nice, plump mass transit budget. Of course, the ostensible purpose of the gas tax holiday is to ease the economic burden on drivers, something that a gas tax holiday can't actually accomplish, but mass transit might.

There is this hopeful bit buried at the bottom of the story:

As for a longer-term solution, Ms. Peters said that on Wednesday she would propose a new arrangement for paying for highways, based in part on private capital financing and use of tolls that vary by time of day.

Congestion pricing? But isn't this proposal going to raise the cost of driving? I thought the ne plus ultra of energy policy was cheap gas, now and forever. Perhaps the tide really is turning ...

(Via Streetsblog.)

Adam Stein is a co-founder of TerraPass.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Sean Casten's avatar

    Sean Casten Posted 8:35 am
    29 Jul 2008

    I saw that articleAnd had the same thought - thanks for posting.
    The bigger problem it seems to me is that mass transit is funded through gasoline taxes, which creates a rather obvious conflict.  It's analagous to using cigarette taxes to fund anti-smoking campaigns.  Well, I guess we do that too, but you get my point!
  2. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 8:48 am
    29 Jul 2008

    Intellectual Speed Trap

    Er...how fast do you think you were going, bub?
    Just because mass transit increases a bit, and gasoline consumption goes down doesn't mean there's an equivalence.
    Yes, I have read that some people, who have SUVs stopped driving them 60 miles into the city when they could take a bus.
    But many more miles are simply the result of consumers deciding not to "joyride" ... as in let's go to the mall, let's go to the corner store...

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement