James Gustave Speth (see Grist interview here) writes a letter to The New York Times:
The world we have known is history. A mere 1 degree Fahrenheit global average warming is already raising sea levels, strengthening hurricanes, disrupting ecosystems, threatening parks and protected areas, causing droughts and heat waves, melting the Arctic and glaciers everywhere and killing tens of thousands of people a year.
Yet there are several more degrees coming in our grandchildren's lifetimes.
It is easy to feel like a character in a bad science fiction novel running down the street shouting "Don't you see it!" while life goes on, business as usual.
Climate change is the biggest thing to happen here on earth in thousands of years, with incalculable environmental, social and economic costs. But there is no march on Washington; students are not in the streets; consumers are not rejecting destructive lifestyles; Congress is not passing far-reaching legislation; the president is not on television explaining the threat to the country; Exxon is not quaking in its boots; and entire segments of evening news pass without mention of the climate emergency.
Instead, 129 new coal-fired power plants are being developed in the United States alone, and so on.
There are many of us caught in this story. We must find one another soon.
James Gustave Speth
New Haven, Feb. 20, 2006
Comments
View as Flat
Doommonger Posted 7:28 pm
23 Feb 2006
Doommonger
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 8:43 pm
23 Feb 2006
Even if we had a brand new energy policy today designed to replace most of fossil fuel combustion in western developed nations, global climate disaster will not be averted.
It will take 30 years to slow down the increase in greenhouse gases, even if we start now on that serious 10 year plan.
But given our corrupt corporatist government that works mainly on crony contracting, bribery, and political cowardice in order to protect the huge corporate welfare subsidies for big energy companies; any plan in the next ten years will be nothing but lipservice as a smokescreen for more fossil fuel and more wars over it.
How many Katrina sized disasters per year will it take until a real plan is developed? 5 mega storms per year for 10 years? 10 per year?
Katrina will cost 200 billion in direct federal costs, was that the estimate I saw?
Maybe a trillion in total losses including lost business.
So take 50 billion per year away from energy company subsidies, for 10 years, and instead use it to get this renewable energy policy off the ground.
Or pay literally 100s of trillions in storm costs alone over the next few decades.
There's a real dilemna, nothing false about it.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
rh Posted 11:51 pm
23 Feb 2006
I agree that we need to immediately get a renewable policy off the ground, but if we stopped putting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere this afternoon, what's already up there is more than enough to generate those hugely expensive storms you speak of, renewable policy or not.
We have a bigger problem than most people realize...and what's the response?
As Speth points out, we decide to build another 100+ coal plants.
Yikes
RH
Permalink
odograph Posted 12:02 am
24 Feb 2006
The bad news is that it isn't happening very quickly. We can hope for a tipping point ... but whether we get one is unpredictable.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 3:31 am
24 Feb 2006
Somehow that makes sense of it all?
Then adopt the naxim: only hopeless causes are really worth fighting for. Onward.
(WW 2 was a hopeless cause too, remember the Battle of Britain. So was the Revolutionary War, remember Valley Forge. Remember the '92 election, another hopeless cause, but with Perot's help Clinton beat Bush)
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 3:41 am
24 Feb 2006
When a new product takes hold, (computers, frisbees, yo-yos)like electric cars, wind, solar,and hydrokinetic power, and reaches a certain percentage of adoption, usually 10%, exponential growth often takes over.
That can shock everyone. The internet tech boom of the 90s exhibited this property. But it fizzled.
This energy revolution will have a much stronger growth pattern once we get it off the ground floor. People need energy, computers are not a necessity in the same sense.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
sid Posted 11:52 pm
24 Feb 2006
to the truth
we see the problem
we feel so alone
but just because it's hopeless
is no reason to give up
share your feelings
gardens and everything you have
if that won't bring people around
nothing else will
Permalink
jdhlax Posted 6:28 pm
25 Feb 2006
Second, even if your hope is something left to grow back, that's well worth fighting for if you let go of your obsession for humans. We're far from being the only form of life, so let's fight to give someone else a chance, even if there's no hope for us.
Jeff Hoffman
Permalink
SMLowry Posted 4:17 am
26 Feb 2006
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 5:20 am
26 Feb 2006
We KNOW that the status quo will continue if we do nothing. The power behind the present corporate/government energy policy is nearly unbeatable.
And for whatever reason, greed, ignorance, insanity, leaders like Cheney just do not care about global climate change.
As the mega-storms become more frequent though, public opinion will shift, fear tends to do that, as does economic hardship. 60 dollar gas tank fillups. 300 dollar per month heating/cooling bills.
The head of Walmart has even noticed high gas prices. He warns on his private website for walmart managers that high gas prices are hurting Walmart sales because it stresses their customers more than it does the upscale retailer's customers. When even a total porcine tyrant like this can see it, everyone will soon realize it.
When a huge trend like this occurs, things change as if by majic.
And rather than rebuilding coastal cities they will eventually be abandoned. People will move north and inland farther to avoid drought, fires, months long power outages, riots..all the things that happened from katrina.
100s of trillions to rebuild will not be there. But in a few years neither will the capital to finance a large scale solution to global climate change. The lost economic growth due to climate change and oil wars/terrorism will deprive society of the savings necessary to finance change.
The good news is it still maybe possible to maintain a reasonable lifestyle on a family and individual basis by sgifting to alternatives now and moving to refions likely to be protectd from storms, drought, and fire. It will mean energy and other necessities will need to be produced sustainably within communities, not much commerce with the outside world of constant mayhem will be affordable or safe.
And then there's always eminent domain, when the big shots need to look for a new capitol they may pick your community, with federal troops enforcing the takeover.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink