U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) yesterday sent the following letter to President George W. Bush, asking him to commit to working with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007.
The Senators are the incoming chairs of three important Senate committees on global warming: Boxer in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; Bingaman in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee; and Lieberman in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The senators' letter to the President follows:
November 15, 2006
The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. President:
As you know, diplomats representing 189 countries, including the United States, are now in Nairobi, Kenya discussing the most pressing environmental issue currently facing mankind: human-induced global warming. Unfortunately, we have not been satisfied with the level of U.S. participation in the international negotiations or in reducing our own domestic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, as incoming Chairs of three important Senate Committees on global warming, we seek your commitment to work with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007. The U.S. must move quickly to adopt economy-wide constraints on domestic GHG emissions and then work with the international community to forge an effective and equitable global agreement.
Scientists are now warning that we may be reaching a "tipping point" beyond which it will be extremely difficult, or perhaps impossible, to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. If the world continues on its current path of emissions increases, we could risk global climatic disasters on an unprecedented scale, ranging from dangerous sea level rise, to increasingly damaging hurricanes (such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita), increased deaths from air pollution and disease, to widespread geo-political instability. A recent report by Sir Nicholas Stern finds that leaving climate change unchecked could cost between 5%-20% of global GDP.
As United States Senators, we have all authored or co-sponsored legislation to combat global warming. Although our approaches differ slightly, we-along with the overwhelming majority of the scientific community, agree that human caused global warming is real and that we must pass legislation to address this threat. We are committed to achieving this result.
As you know, in addition to our proposed bills, on June 22, 2005, the United States Senate went on record for the first time in bipartisan support of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases by a vote 53-44. We have good reason to believe that the number of Senators in support of such legislation is now even larger than that vote demonstrated.
The recent elections have signaled a need to change direction in many areas, including global warming. If we are to leave our children a world that resembles the earth we inherited, we must act now to address GHG emissions. When the 110th Congress begins in January, we pledge to work to pass an effective system of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases.
We urge you to work with us to reach this result and to signal to the world that global warming legislation is on the way.
Respectfully,
Senator Barbara Boxer
Senator Jeff Bingaman
Senator Joseph Lieberman
Now, according to No Se Nada, the problem is how to get this plea beyond some major obstacles -- namely, the House chairmen -- and onto the President's desk. For instance, John Dingell, who will chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is known for his chumminess with the auto industry.
Still, this is good news from Capitol Hill ... where the climate, I hope, has changed for the better.
Comments
View as Flat
jscorse Posted 2:42 am
16 Nov 2006
J.S.
htt://voicesofreason.info
Permalink
raw411 Posted 3:35 am
16 Nov 2006
Permalink
bookerly Posted 4:28 am
16 Nov 2006
Hey, if Bush would get serious about global warming, we could name the Washington Airport after him, and anything else he wants... (and I ALWAYS bash Bush every chance I get).
Waiting is foolish, and many of the Democrats are clueless. A letter signed by roughly six percent of their senate members is not particularly meaningful.
Couldn't they at least get McCain or some other ambitious 2008 Repub contender to sign?
patrick
Permalink
jscorse Posted 4:49 am
16 Nov 2006
J.S.
htt://voicesofreason.info
Permalink
jjwfmme Posted 5:20 am
16 Nov 2006
If this were the first veto of his presidency, the issue would be front and center, and the Republicans' attitudes would be as well. That would be good.
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 5:58 am
16 Nov 2006
Here, again, is the NY Times article, about the international meeting in Nairobi, that is summarized in Daily Grist:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/world/16climate.html?ex...
I suppose Kofi Annan could not directly say that he had the US in mind, when he criticized the "leadership" of certain countries. Diplomats do not do that.
But the response of the US delegation, to the effect that Of course, Annan was not referring to the US!, is extremely disspiriting.
Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!
Permalink
bookerly Posted 5:01 pm
16 Nov 2006
patrick
Permalink
Sarah K. Burkhalter Posted 10:49 am
20 Nov 2006
Permalink