Barack Obama's answers to the 14 top science questions facing America.
(McCain is still working on his answers.)
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success 6 Posted 11 hours, 58 minutes ago
What to make of the new climate poll 8 Posted 21 hours, 14 minutes ago
Will Africa’s farmland become a ‘resource curse’? 6 Posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
Science debate 2008
Barack Obama's answers to the 14 top science questions facing America.
(McCain is still working on his answers.)
Maywa Montenegro is an editor and writer at Seed magazine, focusing mainly on ecology, bidiversity, agriculture, and sustainable development.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
hapa Posted 6:19 am
02 Sep 2008
Make solar energy economical
Provide energy from fusion
Develop carbon sequestration methods
Manage the nitrogen cycle
Provide access to clean water
Restore and improve urban infrastructure
Advance health informatics
Engineer better medicines
Reverse-engineer the brain
Prevent nuclear terror
Secure cyberspace
Enhance virtual reality
Advance personalized learning
Engineer the tools of scientific discovery
it's the hammer show! all nails, all the time.
Permalink
Bob Wallace Posted 7:06 am
02 Sep 2008
And Passing should be 50%. Just so it doesn't mess up his 'D' average....
Permalink
Pangolin Posted 7:16 am
02 Sep 2008
Thus the important items:
Reverse-engineer the brain
Advanced personal learning
Enhance virtual reality (please don't, I have trouble with the dishes as is)
Engineer the tools of scientific discovery.
Advanced health informatics
I think if we understood more about how humans actually worked we might have a better lever on solving some of the other problems. The most significant to my thinking are advancing personal learning and developing better and more accurate tools for certifying that learning.
We waste huge amounts of time and money aquiring "degrees" which are really certificates of participation since they tell us nothing about how much information is retained or integrated into a logical matrix.
Thus you can have a B.S. in biology and be a creationist at the same time. A complete waste of four years.
Put the Carbon Back
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 8:26 am
02 Sep 2008
It gets kind of annoying when people try to equivocate Political Debate, and Scientific Debate.
Unlike Politics, Science often isn't dependent merely on your personal point of view. And John Q Public and TV Pundits aren't qualified to create their own scientific analysis.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/arianna-spars-wi ...
-David Ahlport
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 8:31 am
02 Sep 2008
-David Ahlport
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 3:34 pm
02 Sep 2008
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:06 pm
02 Sep 2008
He knew every answer off the top of his head. Could McCain or Palin do that?
Be honest or not in your answer mcbush-licans. It is of no consequence to those of us who know the answer.
Obama can mop the floor with almost anyone on the planet on any subject. Without an open book.
Who else is ready to lead in this complex and dangerous situtation that the vast incompetence and corruption of the necon bushwacking has landed us in?
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:13 pm
02 Sep 2008
Compare the respect that Obama would have in any meeting with any leader, to Bush meetings with other leaders. Is it any wonder why we are slipping in terms of foreign policy, trade, and all other venues of negotiation?
McCain's many slipups in simple concepts time after time, puts him in the mental mode of duuhbya. No wonder he voted with the administration 95% of the time.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
hapa Posted 9:10 pm
02 Sep 2008
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 11:24 pm
02 Sep 2008
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 11:26 pm
02 Sep 2008
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 11:29 pm
02 Sep 2008
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 1:18 am
03 Sep 2008
We know when a lot of young lives end, prematurely. When Rummi's schock and awe focused on the water supply, of the nation that didn't attack us on 9/11.
Infants and children, purportedly so precious to the GOP, were doomed from water bourne illness, in the 100s of thousands by that move.
Haliburton was payed with US tax dollars to fix the water supply. Instead they supplied contaminated water to US troops and even electrocuted some soldiers with shoddy electrical systems in showers.
Has any of the damage to Iraqi children's water supply been acomplished for the 100s of billions spent on rebuilding? That's yet to be verified.
As the great communicator said, "Trust but verify." is trusting Bush administration crony contracting, without verification, a sound policy move? Not so much.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 1:52 am
03 Sep 2008
That's what I call "a public spanking."
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
vakibs Posted 2:42 am
03 Sep 2008
There is a minor difference between the two. A science debate is just a political debate on matters that concern science and scientists.
By the way, I am very impressed by the answers given by Obama. He gets a 100/100 from my point of view.
By choosing a veep who promotes intelligent design, I think I can guess a thing or two about McCain answers. But let's wait and see what he says.
Could any other national leader ever compete with Obama on sheer knowledge and reasoning power?
Obama is a smart guy, but here you are getting too sycophantic.. amazingdrx.
There is no shortage of PhDs amongst the world leadership. The prime minister of my country (Dr Manmohan Singh) was working as a professor in the London school of economics before he took office. Putin of Russia has a doctorate on energy economics (as mentioned in this article). There are several smart guys on the world scene already.. It is the turn of the USA to respond in kind.
Let's think in terms of eco-dollars.
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 3:30 am
03 Sep 2008
Permalink
Pangolin Posted 8:54 am
03 Sep 2008
When you have a funeral for every menstruation of a married woman, since you have to assume that it could have been a fertilized egg not implanted, then we will know that life truly begins at conception for them.
Until then it's all BS designed to sucker the stupid with baby-killer talk.
Put the Carbon Back
Permalink
mreinbold Posted 3:23 pm
03 Sep 2008
Permalink