Stocks of wild salmon in the North Pacific are in trouble. That's news.
What isn't news is that the spring has passed us by in Massachusetts again without returning more than a handful of wild Atlantic Salmon. The river closest to me, the Connecticut, saw just 132 salmon return, nearly all of which were captured at either of two dams and whisked away by biologists working for the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Restoration program. The fish are bred at hatcheries so next spring the young can be released back into the river, hopefully to grow, go to sea, and return (others were tagged and released upstream of the dams to breed naturally this fall). But is it worth the effort?
This program has been in place for 41 years now, and has long been hoped to return this magnificent fish to the state in healthy numbers. Each spring, scores of volunteers fan out around the region, gently dipping buckets full of juvenile 'fry' salmon (one to two million each year) into 37 of the river's tributaries and hope for the best. But it's an effort that's been mighty slim on returns so far.
The Merrimack River up near the New Hampshire border also saw very few salmon return (114), despite great leaps forward in water quality and habitat restoration efforts, as in the Connecticut. Both rivers still enjoy much larger American Shad runs (24,000 in the former and 155,000 in the latter this year), and likely salmon have always played second fiddle to shad here, since Mass. is at the southern end of the salmon's range (h/t Gary Sanderson). Historic accounts support this, though for a long time, salmon were thought to be much more important here, probably because they thrived during the 300 year window of the Little Ice Age which coincided with European settlement. Still, those numbers of shad are way low. John McPhee's classic book The Founding Fish gives the best sense for how dominant shad fishing was economically speaking in the early settlements.
Unknowns include how many of these salmon are being caught at sea, how well they'll weather the warming of the Connecticut's tributaries due to a heating climate, and how they'd do without the dams.
So what should a state biologist do? Pull the plug? Are 132 salmon better than none? I say that they are, that each one is absolutely worth it, literally and probably figuratively worth its weight in gold. The lesson may be that a restoration program like this may prove impossible, but if so, it's an important gesture and an effort to put things right.
Top 25 reasons to give a damn about climate change
Global boiling declares war on Thanksgiving
Climate Citizen: Michael Pollan on agriculture and health care
Comments
View as Threaded
sindark Posted 6:56 am
09 Jul 2008
The question is what alternatives are possible. If there is something that will achieve a better outcome - for salmon elsewhere or for another species - perhaps these efforts should be discontinued.
After all, doctors in hospitals do not devote the bulk of their attention to terminal patients. It is the ones where effort can yield recovery that are worth focusing on.
Of course, it is also vital to tell the story of failure in relation to these particular fish. If people forget that they used to exist, it becomes to easy to believe that humans are always a fairly benign force in the world.
a sibilant intake of breath
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 8:12 pm
09 Jul 2008
He does not have too much to say about salmon, but an early report on page 55 about salmon in northern Atlantic waters (by a New Brunswick-based source) is illustrative.
As for what a "state biologist" should do: Well, it never hurts to start with a little prayer, to the Creator of us all, including the fish. But right, if funds are an issue (and I do not know that that is the case here!), and if biologists think that some animals can indeed be saved with a bit of help, while other animals are going to be iffy even with help, then they may very well be justified to pull the plug.
Hopefully, there will be a few bucks to make a good record of the last remaining Atlantic salmon, before they are consigned to extinction.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Erik Hoffner Posted 10:58 pm
09 Jul 2008
More hopeful are the salmon stocks in Maine's rivers. So even if the Mass populations of salmon are on the wane and will need our help to perpetuate for some time, there's hope in those (so far) cooler climes to the north.
But they face a different and additional unknown that the Mass stocks don't face: the genetic/ecological effect of escapee atlantic salmon from Maine's many salmon farms which tend to wind up in those same rivers.
Erik
The Orion Grassroots Network: 1,200+ grassroots groups working for conservation & more
Permalink