Rule three of offsets: No geo-engineering
Smacking down a bad idea 5
Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Threaded
Sam Wells Posted 2:22 pm
27 Jul 2007
I haven't researched this very well, but some folks such as in Japan actually farm seaweed. I'm serious. As plant, it does its carbon absorption thing. It seeds itself and dies every year.
So then they take the seaweed up onto the beaches and do several things with it, all good.
Drying and burning it as a renewable energy source in a boiler. Seems old fashioned, but seaweed can burn pretty dang hot and no petroleum products are used, except maybe some natural gas to get things going.
Eating the stuff and using it for consumer products. We don't eat much seaweed but I like it in some oriental dishes, and plus the stuff can be used in all kinds of products, amazingly. Sold in some alternative vitamin stores as well.
Fertilizing with it. This actually has some American roots along the coastlines, since as late as WWII people were hauling seaweed onto the breach to be dried, and to allow natural rain to reduce the salt content. Then throw it on the fields as a soil conditioner and fertilizer. Great stuff.
Brewing. Whoa, don't forget this one, certain kinds of moss seaweed make excellent products for helping clarify beer on the cool-down cycle, the "break." I use two heaping spoons of Irish Moss per 5 gallons.
One heck of a clam bake. This classic Indian inspired method requires a beach fire pit with lots of rocks in the bottom with a huge amount of coals; seaweed is put on top of layers having clams, fish, lobsters, corn, and whatever works.
Making a bullwhip from Pacific kelp roots - now how cool is that?
I'd better stop before I get carried away. Seaweed is useful and the idea of creating biomass and then using it seems cool. I'm no expert and I'm heard that invasive aquatic species are taking over from the "good" kinds of seaweed, although its extent is not clear in my mind. /sammie
Onward through the fog
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:28 am
29 Jul 2007
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
Peter Donovan Posted 10:48 am
29 Jul 2007
Soil, even in its presently depleted state, holds more carbon than the atmosphere and all the world's vegetation combined. The best thing about soil is that it's a proven sink, we influence it greatly, and soil carbon is a tremendous asset as organic matter. We can feed soil with carbon using perennial grasses (mainly in temperate climates) using current solar energy. It's proven, it works. Let's not use it to offset more fossil fuel burning. Let's use it to stop global warming.
Details at http://www.biospheremedia.org
Permalink
kwhilden Posted 2:09 pm
29 Jul 2007
Another interesting paper came out in Science last week, which demonstrated that mineral dust from melting icebergs has significant biologic benefits on the local food chain. Apparently, mineral dust lands on ice as it forms high on the Antarctic continent. When that ice eventually melts as an iceberg, this dust is released and stimulates the local plankton because of the beneficial effects of iron. The krill eat the plankton, and also increase in numbers, which feeds everything that eats krill (fish, baleen whales). The paper noticed an increased population of birds around the bergs, which eat the fish. This is discussed in Time magazine this week:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1647451, ...
According to this study, it sure seems like natural iron fertilization has positive effects on the food chain in the antarctic, and I think that humans could figure out beneficial ways to stimulate it as a way to solve global warming. It's not the only solution, but it sure seems like a natural one that can be applied in parallel with energy efficiency and renewable energy.
Permalink
Adam Stein Posted 12:16 pm
30 Jul 2007
I do want to point out, though, that as far as I know, there really aren't any offsets available from geo-engineering projects. Certainly there aren't any in the compliance markets. I think Planktos briefly tried to offer some in the voluntary market, but then stopped, probably in response to criticism. So unless I'm mistaken, this rule is more theoretical than practical.
www.terrapass.com/blog
Permalink