Rifkin’s in my head 1

Wow, this is a fantastic interview with Jeremy Rifkin. I was only peripherally aware of the guy, but damn, he's mirroring my entire worldview (no wonder I like it!). He's got the exact right idea, about sequestration and clean coal, about nuclear, about distributed generation, smart grids, you name it. I kept highlighting parts to excerpt, but I ended up highlighting the whole thing. Here's a bit:

These technologies -- uranium-based nuclear, coal, gas, fossil fuels -- they're old, centralized, elite 20th-century technology. They do not fit the kind of open source, flat distributive world that a younger generation is moving into in the 21st century.

Word.

The big point of contention will be his commitment to hydrogen as an energy-storage mechanism. As I wrote here, storage is the missing piece of the puzzle, in terms of getting away from those "old, centralized, elite" technologies to distributed renewable power.

We need some way of storing the surplus energy -- a way that's flexible, reliable, and scaleable. I don't really know enough to have a strong opinion about what that should be. Lithium-ion batteries? Hydrogen? Something?

Above all , Rifkin is right about this:

[C]an we do it? I think it depends on whether all of civilization can be centered around one mission in the next 30 years and only one mission, and that is the Third Industrial Revolution, with a convergence of distributive communication and energy and renewables and hydrogen storage. If we don't do it, and we waste time on marginal issues, we’re lost.

More than anything, the entire world needs to focus on this.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Michael_Hoexter Posted 3:06 am
    22 Aug 2006

    Hydrogen is the wrong storage solutionRifkin is pretty good on most issues except hydrogen.  It is a waste of energy to store electricity in hydrogen.  There are other solutions: batteries, pumped hydro storage, compressed air that are 2 or 3 times as efficient as liquid H2.  The Hydrogen economy is an expensive boondoggle that will die.  Renewables = excellent.  Hydrogen = poor. See:

    http://www.efcf.com/reports/E17.pdf
    These are fuel cell researchers who are giving up on hydrogen because of the inefficiency.
    Michael

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement