Indeed, the depressing reports come fast and furious. German-based Energy Watch Group says the world has already reached peak oil, and predicts that production will now fall by 7 percent a year. The Worldwatch Institute suggests that 21 cities that will have populations of 8 million or more by 2015 are highly vulnerable to havoc wreaked by rising seas. The comprehensive "The U.S. Economic Impacts of Climate Change and the Costs of Inaction" suggests that the U.S. faces hundreds of billions of dollars in weather-related damages in coming years if it doesn't get crackin' on climate-change mitigation. And an informal office poll suggests that no one got laid last night. Will the dry spell never end?
Good News for People Who Love Bad News
Reports bring various doomy and gloomy predictions 5
-
Posted 1:52 PM on 22 Oct 2007
-
Posted in
-
Read More About
Related Stories
Cautious optimism for Copenhagen deal as Barcelona climate talks end
Another coal plant bites the dust
Barcelona outcome: White House strategy is plea for more time
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Threaded
odograph Posted 4:28 am
23 Oct 2007
(that was an olde movie reference!)
Permalink
Pathos Posted 1:30 pm
23 Oct 2007
(Yeah, no one at my office got laid last night, either. We could start an interoffice support group, but in my experience, that sort of thing doesn't usually go well. It mostly distracts from work and causes meaningless drama. Also, I don't work in an office.)
But how, exactly, is peak oil a bad thing? Call me an ignorant hippie, but if there's less oil, won't people, y'know... Burn less oil? And doesn't that lead to a drop in greenhouse gas emissions? Someone fill me in on what I'm missing, but this is starting to sound suspiciously like a good thing.
Permalink
odograph Posted 12:38 am
24 Oct 2007
The rate of transition is pretty much up in the air at this point, but the "half by 2030" number used in the upstream EWG report might not be so bad ... for hippies. Plenty of time to tune up everyone's bicycles.
(I was going to studiously avoid the last 2 lines ... but I am reminded of a cartoon from Whole Earth years ago. It showed two futures, techno-bliss and hippie-nirvana. In the hippie future people were all riding bikes, and the sign in the park said "love-in today, 2:00 PM".)
Permalink
gmunger Posted 2:53 am
24 Oct 2007
As odo likes to point out, predicting the socio-econo-politico- implications of peak oil is problematic. True dat.
But having just seen Jim Hanson, live in concert, one of the main factors for mitigating GW that he harped on is the urgent need to put a price on carbon. Strikes me that as the global petroleum supply and demand curves shoot past each other like fighter jets in an air show, the price-o-petro is bound to rise significantly. That sounds like a good thing to me, assuming you believe in all this climate-change stuff.
That said, Hanson was also adamant that coal is where the real issue lies. And if we react to petro shortage by substituting coal-based liquid fuels....
Permalink
Pathos Posted 6:52 am
24 Oct 2007
Other than that, rock on with the peak oil. Here's hoping production costs soar, and the oil companies generously pass those savings on to the consumer.
Permalink