Renewable energy: show me the money

Everybody talks about it, nobody funds it 5

The administration claims, at least, to be interested in two goals:

  1. Reducing U.S. dependence on oil.
  2. Addressing the threat of climate change.

No. 1 rules out imported fossil fuels; No 2 rules out coal. What's that leave? Renewable energy.

So WTF:

Congressional earmarks that redirected Energy Department financing last year slowed or even shelved many research projects, including ones to develop bigger and more efficient wind turbines, to make hydrogen power out of a mix of algae and water, and to plant matter.

Its scientists are also doing ground-breaking work on finding environmentally benign ways of generating electricity to produce hydrogen from water to power cars; they are working on new materials and designs to make devices powered by solar cells cheaper; and they are developing enzymes and more efficient machinery to convert switchgrass and corn stalks into biofuels to reduce oil consumption.

...

But it is hardly the kind of crash program that government labs have conducted in the past to build an atomic bomb or go to the moon. Rather, the lab gingerly hands over slices of its yearly budget of $200 million to a smorgasbord of programs in solar, wind, plant matter, geothermal, hydrogen and fuel cells, efficient buildings, advanced vehicles and fuels and electric infrastructure.

"Our budget is nothing compared to the price of a B2 bomber or an aircraft carrier," Rob Farrington, manager of the lab's advanced vehicle systems group, said.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. bookerly Posted 10:29 am
    29 Jan 2007

    Window Dressing

       Or is it bait and switch?  "Come into my renewables store people, oh you want some solar?  We're fresh out, but here is some new clear coal!"
       Watch and see if the Democrats do it differently, they have the power, will they use it?  (I HOPE SO!).
       Great post,
    patrick
  2. amazingdrx Posted 12:48 pm
    29 Jan 2007

    NopeClean coal and ethanol is the party line.  Too bad.
    Trying to change that with a state party platform plank and a referendum.  It is an uphill battle educating our representatives, they hear the loud voices of cash carrying lobbyists for industrial coal and agribizz.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
  3. Nucbuddy Posted 3:06 pm
    29 Jan 2007

    False energy-path dichotomiesDavid Roberts: No. 1 rules out imported fossil fuels; No 2 rules out coal. What's that leave?

    Nuclear power?

    http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/info.html
  4. planetthoughts Posted 7:01 pm
    29 Jan 2007

    Blinders are onAgree with the previous comments.  The current Administration sees everything through political (and old boy network) filters.  Hello, you are playing with our world, guys!
    I hope the Democrats will be more alert to the real situation.  I am not sure, but it seems far more likely they will be listening to input from scientists, and from their own eyes and ears.
    Sorry to politicize this, but it would be hard to be much worse than the current Administration on the environment.  Maybe the rulers of China are... but they have far better car/truck mileage laws, and are beginning to turn around from their dark ages.

    David Alexander

    PlanetThoughts.org



    Love your Planet.
  5. liquidwindows Posted 1:56 am
    30 Jan 2007

    hypocritical oathBush has always talked out of both sides of his mouth.  I got a real kick out of him visiting a solar research facility that he had defunded to show his "commitment" to renewables.  He had to quickly set up emergency funding to hire back some of the scientists at the facility for the photo op ("gotta have me some scientific lookin' people in the shot")- they were let go when the project again had the budget cut after the photo op.

    See each day with the wonder of a child. But with wisdom - not like a horse with blinders.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement