Plans have moved forward for the first new U.S. oil refinery in more than 30 years, as voters in South Dakota's Union County approved a rezoning that would allow the project to be built. Energy company Hyperion Resources says the planned $10 billion facility would be a "green refinery" and would produce ultra-low-sulfur gasoline and diesel. (Never mind that it may suck as much as 12 million gallons of water a day from the Missouri River and generate 17.2 million tons of carbon dioxide per year). Hyperion has plenty of bureaucracy-wading left to do, and the project may face litigation from residents concerned about their health and the environment.
source: Associated Press, Argus Leader
Comments
View as Flat
Delay And Deny Posted 7:23 am
04 Jun 2008
Combined with crude from the Bakken Formation, this refinery could probably handle 1000% of domestic needs.
We could shut down the US coastal refineries entirely and save on transportation, old technologies, etc.
We could turn Alaska back to the polar bears.
Imagine taking I-95 out of the Holland Tunnel to New Brunswick and seeing marshland and meadow...
Permalink
applej Posted 12:13 pm
04 Jun 2008
The people of Union County have been warned by Hyperion of the inevitable future widespread pollution, high risk of birth defeats, and damage to the county roads that will accompany the refinery. It is doubtful that there will be anything "green" about Hyperion- unless you can count the billions of dollars driving the creation of the plant.
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 12:53 pm
04 Jun 2008
Really? That's interesting...it's funny that you've never posted before on Grist...or at least this is your first comment. How did you come to read this particular article and just happen to have lived right near the subject matter?
What town and school did you grow up in and attend?
Quick...no Googling before answering....
Permalink
KevinMichael Posted 3:14 pm
04 Jun 2008
Refining capacity is a major factor in the retail price of gasoline. Intentionally suffocating this industry is criminal.
You should also consider that if this gasoline is not produced in South Dakota, it will be produced elsewhere. Do you think granola heads will be suing refiners in Venezuela, Mexico, or any other emerging economy? No. Keep your mouth shut as the net pollution/embodied energy & resources consumption will be as low as economically possible.
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 3:51 pm
04 Jun 2008
Where's your math for this?
You realize that's mean the Bakken Formation would haveta be many times larger than the Saudi reserves, right?
And that 1000% our domestic needs would easily be enough for all transportation and energy on the planet, right?
...so...ya think this one refinery will be enough to provide energy and gas for the entire planet, and then some?
Methinks ya need to work on your math skills.
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 3:55 pm
04 Jun 2008
This is often cited by proponents of fossil fuels.
The problem is, it's very misleading.
By sayin' that we haven't built any new refineries, they give the impression that our refining capacity hasn't increased in 30 years.
But that's wrong. There may not have been any new refineries, but plenty of the old ones have expanded and several have more than doubled in size in the past few years.
Refining capacity, overall, has increased greatly.
Permalink
applej Posted 1:31 pm
06 Jun 2008
Permalink