Philly Phights Back

Philly’s universal school lunch program lives on—for now 3

Sometimes sanity prevails. Philly’s Universal Feeding school lunch program—whose announced cancellation caused an uproar the other week—just got a reprieve, at least until 2010. The Philly Inquirer has the story:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has decided not to discontinue a Philadelphia school breakfast and lunch program that provides free meals to poor students, members of the city’s congressional delegation announced yesterday.

Democratic Sens. Bob Casey and Arlen Specter and Rep. Chaka Fattah said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack had reversed an agency plan to end the program, which allows more than 120,000 students in poor schools to eat free meals without having to fill out applications.

USDA spokeswoman Chris Mather said the agency had “postponed making a decision” on the program until Congress considered a national update of child nutrition programs. Congress this year is expected to consider a reauthorization and overhaul of the Child Nutrition Act.

But postponement is better than nothing. And it gives time for Sens. Casey and Specter to write the program into law (it’s currently a pilot program) as well as to push for an expansion of the program into other cities. I don’t have a sense at the moment of their chances for success since the reauthorization itself has so many moving parts—it’s not at all clear what the reformed Child Nutrtion Act will look like. That said, as I observed in my original post on the subject, automatic opt-in programs like Universal Feeding are exactly the kind of reforms that many in the Obama adminstration, such as Budget Director Peter Orszag and his deputy Cass Sunstein, are committed to introducing.

To me, this story is about USDA Under Secretary Janey Thornton’s disastrous debut on school lunch policy. It was she, after all, who allowed this whole cancellation debacle to happen. We can only hope she has learned her lesson.

Tom is a media and technology professional who thinks that wrecking the planet is a bad idea. He twitters madly and blogs here and at Beyond Green about food policy, alternative energy, climate science and politics as well as the multiple and various effects of living on a warming planet.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Catmoves Posted 10:21 am
    09 Jun 2009

    "Universal Feeding school lunch program"?Philadelphia wants to feed the world's school children?Oh, BTW, whatever happened to kids taking their lunch to school in brown paper bags? Those bags Moms used to fill with nutritious and wholesome food? At very low cost. And sharing your lunch with kids who had "forgotten" theirs?Now, it seems, the nanny society doesn't think moms and dads should work and supply breakfasts and lunches to their kids. Hey, folks, if you can't afford to feed them, just stop getting preggers.Do we ever have any statistics supplied on the households who "can't afford" to feed their own children? Bet it would be interesting.
  2. Storm Dragon Posted 12:59 pm
    09 Jun 2009

    I agree, a healthy homemade lunch is generally a better option than the school cafeteria, and is greatly to be encouraged.  Owing to the sorry state of the economy, however, an increasing number of parents are out of work, and finding it hard to feed their families.  Sometimes, they may have to choose between buying food and paying the rent.  It's all very well to tell people not to have babies if they can't feed them, but this does nothing to help the children already born, whose families have fallen on hard times.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement