Dear Umbra,
When at a beach with no bathrooms, is it better, environmentally speaking, to urinate in the ocean or behind a sand dune?
Tom
Greenville, N.C.
Dearest Tom,
A good, silly summer question to consider as regards our impact on the natural environment. There are non-environmental concerns with beach urination as well, such as disgusting your fellow sunbathers and your fellow readers. Who, however, will cast the first wad of toilet paper and say she or he has not had this dilemma?
Come on in, the water's warm(er).
Photo: iStockphoto
The answer will vary a little depending on where you are and what restrictions are in place, but in general Leave No Trace is the outdoor ethic we should be striving for, whether we are in the wilderness or on Atlantic Beach. Leave No Trace principles concerning human waste include doing your best to avoid polluting water sources, minimizing social and wildlife contacts, and maximizing decomposition.
Happily, urine is not the problem that feces are. The main trouble with our practically sterile urine is its smell and saltiness, both of which can attract wildlife. The wildlife may then look around for something tasty near the smell, digging into soil, nibbling plants, and what have you until they are disappointed and depart. Hence, when urinating on land, it's best to target less sensitive sandy or rocky areas. Which sounds just like a dune -- but wait. Dunes are notoriously sensitive, and let's also keep in mind avoiding social contacts, i.e., being careful not to leave a stinky location for fellow beachgoers to encounter. Given all this, I think ocean water would be the preference. If the water is too cold or you are too wimpy, just make sure you go below the high-tide line (though still out of sight of your fellow beachgoers) -- then nature will flush your liquid waste away.
I realize you didn't ask about freshwater, Tom, but there are river, lake, and quarry-side beaches we must consider. In a river canyon setting, for instance, it's hard to get 200 feet away from water and trails, so I guess the common practice is to pee in the river. But in other wilderness-type situations, in which we can get 200 feet away from water and publicly used places, we should urinate on a rocky or sandy area, feeling confident that it is not the exact stinky place where everyone else is urinating, and that a curious critter won't do too much damage. (In an actual wilderness area, follow human waste instructions from the nearest ranger station.)
Now, I have something special for the ladies as regards public urination. We now have the go-ahead to pee in the water in a river-canyon-type situation. What of the wilderness-type situation and the problem with pulling down your pants to squat while guys get to pretend they are intensely studying shrubbery? It's awkward, and I am here to tell you about a few products that can help us urinate standing up and fully clothed. I have not used these products, but I know people who have and swear by them in situations from hiking to farming to portapottying -- I know you can think of an occasion when you would have preferred to remain standing and pretend you were studying the shrubbery. These are all funnel variants: The pStyle is plastic, 7.5 inches long, and comes in a variety of tasteful colors, the Shewee is for the British ladies -- these both fit into your pocket or purse and are reusable. There are disposable versions, such as the Whizzy, the Urinelle, and the P-Mate, but you know how we feel about disposable items. Try 'em if you think you'd like 'em -- and let me know how it goes.
Freely,
Umbra
Ask Umbra on climate-skeptic teachers, low-flow toilets, and more
Tweet for the bees
Comments
View as Flat
Mark Powell Posted 5:13 am
25 Jun 2007
Permalink
shoreranger Posted 6:32 am
25 Jun 2007
It doesn't take much for a "social trail" to form on a dune to an area convenient for urinating (two or three trips can be enough). A dune trail absent of vegetation can quickly "channel" coastal winds that will gouge out sections of a dune, quickly blowing sand away. This can expose roots of plants not even trampled, and kill them as well, leading to the destruction of a complete dune system. This can happen not in "geologic time" of hundreds or thousands of years, but as quickly as a matter of months.
Permalink
truroporch Posted 8:35 am
25 Jun 2007
Permalink
J72Pete Posted 10:34 pm
25 Jun 2007
It's a silly topic.. I appreciate the advice that going in the ocean is better. Taking a dump in the sand is clearly less than ideal.
But if anyone's really worried about this stuff, it might be more worthwhile and meaningful to evaluate one's indoor water usage, no?
Permalink
shoreranger Posted 11:55 pm
25 Jun 2007
It reminds me of the dog owners who choose to argue against the picking-up of dog waste based on the premise that dog waste is "natural". Dogs are territorial and travel in packs naturally. If left to their own devices one pack of less than a dozen dogs would cover a significant area and keep other dogs out. There would be no where near the concentration of dogs that exists now in our cities.
Human waste is "natural". Concentrating millions of humans at the shore during a 3-6 month period of the year is not "natural", and the concentrration of waste they bring with them is not natural, as well. This also goes for trails in "the woods". Hundreds of millions of visitors to our national parks and forests each year is a lot of waste concentrated just off of trails and campsites, not dispursed throughout the millions of acres of land that actually constitutes our parks and forests. Those "srips" and "patches" cannot sustain all that waste, and the rest of the acres cannot endure the trampling of so many hikers and campers looking for a space to "do what comes naturally". Even if it gets burried, in just a few days it may not be possible to see withthe naked eye how many little turd-holes had been recently dug in a spot the current pooper may assume has not seen human presence in hundreds of years. The best solution: LNT's take it with you. You will be glad the person before you did. Burying it is simply just not good enough.
Permalink
wilderness Posted 6:45 am
27 Jun 2007
Since we can never know definitively what the impacts of excreting these partially metabolized compounds will be, i think that in most cases the precautionary principle would suggest peeing and pooing as far away from any body of water as possible, if only to allow the nasties more time to get filtered by the soil etc. The key is to be mindful of where you're relieving yourself and tinkling as lightly on the earth as possible.
Anyone have any scientific data to support or negate this theory? I'd like to know more (eg. the endocrine disrupting properties of synthetics).
Permalink
thriftynerdyjockmom Posted 1:09 am
28 Jun 2007
We were told by Idaho river guides (among others) to pee in the fast-moving river. Solid waste was packed out.
Permalink
Elliotte Posted 6:57 am
03 Jul 2007
Permalink