McCain VP pick Sarah Palin has a record of being both a friend and foe of Big Oil in her home state of Alaska. But she's also made a point of voicing support for renewable and "clean" energy sources. Flashback one week to Palin's big convention speech in St. Paul: "Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to lay more pipelines, build more nuclear plants, create jobs with clean coal, and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources."
As governor, she promised enviros in her state that she's going to come out with a comprehensive energy plan, and even appointed someone to head up that mission. But her actions as governor are a mixed bag when it comes to supporting renewables. In 2007, Palin vetoed $20 million in state money to support the Fire Island Wind Farm Project, before this year allowing it to move forward. At the same time, she vetoed $268 million in budget items this year, including other wind and energy projects. The same budget included $2 million for an controversial conference intended to "highlight arguments that global warming isn't threatening the survival of polar bears." Palin herself has argued against listing the polar bear as endangered, rejecting the recommendations of state and national biologists.
Meanwhile, a number of renewable projects in the state are stalled due to a lack of funding. And as the Anchorage Daily News points out, the $1,200 checks for "energy relief" that Palin ensured would be handed out to every resident of the state last year totaled $700 million. That could cover nearly half of the $1.5 billion price tag for a hydropower project currently under consideration in Lake Chakachamna, which could move the state toward clean, home-grown energy.
This year, everyone in the state is getting $2,069 from the state's oil royalties fund, as well as another $1,200 from the state treasury to help offset high fuel prices.
Why buying cheap energy certificates worsens climate change
For McCain, it’s really all about the fake snow
Comments
View as Flat
Russ Posted 2:06 am
10 Sep 2008
Palin and Mccain - Welfare and Warfare.
Permalink
Pangolin Posted 2:57 am
10 Sep 2008
At a direct subsidy of $10k per household installed and assuming 2.5 residents per household that would have covered 70k installlations yearly. That could have fitted every household in AK with geothermal heat in four years resulting in a huge economic benefit for her state.
Instead she handed out cash checks that went straight into the oil companies bank accounts at the end of the day. What a waste.
Put the Carbon Back
Permalink
Angelsnecropolis Posted 4:04 am
10 Sep 2008
It seems obvious to me that she is not a friend to the environment with her strong opposition to endangered species and her failed actions for energy efficiency and renewable. She can talk all she wants but without action to back it up her words are meaningless.
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 4:24 am
10 Sep 2008
http://greyfalcon.net/palin.wma
http://greyfalcon.net/palin2
http://greyfalcon.net/palin3
_
Not only is she anti-renewables.
She's anti-infrastructure.
-David Ahlport
Permalink
Palinater Posted 4:48 am
10 Sep 2008
Permalink
Russ Posted 6:04 am
10 Sep 2008
This is characteristic behavior of petrostates. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and others subsidize energy domestically in order to buy the people's allegience. Indeed Iran, for all its oil production, has to import gasoline, that's how much the subsidies have spurred domestic consumption.
In this week's Time Michael Kinsley calls Alaska "an adjunct of OPEC".
That's exactly right - any petrostate, by working to perpetuate the oil economy and keep America hunkered in the bunker, and this is all Alaska's government does, is working for the domination of OPEC, since all of Alaska's oil is only a few drops of America's consumption, and it's not earmarked for domestic use anyway. Much of it is sold to Asia.
Permalink