Oregon's Measure 63

Permit me to ignore building codes 1

Eric de Place is a senior research at Sightline Institute, a Seattle-based sustainability think tank, working on promoting smart policy decisions for the Pacific Northwest. Visit http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score to read more on Sightline’s blog.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. jleejj Posted 4:21 pm
    14 Oct 2008

    Vote yes or support the bureaucracy Have you ever tried to actually get a building permit?  Or have you ever owned a home in Oregon?  This editorial seems out of touch with the reality of the modern building department.  Lane county, Oregon requires a permit to replace a failed water heater with an identical model, or fix a leaking pipe if more than 5 feet of pipe need replacing.  
    Permits have little to do with safety and everything with skimming profits from the building industry and monitoring homeowners for taxable improvements.  I'm not suggesting that shoddy unsafe work doesn't get done in Oregon.  Lots of it occurs!  But it already occurs outside the permitting process and this measure won't change that.
    What this measure does offer is simplicity and sanity for those of us who have no interesting in making our homes a firetrap in the first place.  This measure also does not exempt homeowners from following the state building code.  If new home buyers are worried about improvements, they can pay for inspections at the time of purchase.
    I say vote YES for 63!  Stop letting the government and large contractors regulate the improvements you make to your home.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement