Updated 22 Aug 2008
In the early months of Barack Obama\'s presidential campaign, enviros were skeptical of his (now heavily qualified) support for coal-to-liquids technology and unvarnished enthusiasm for ethanol, but he earned their respect with his aggressive climate and energy plan. The plan centers on a cap-and-trade system that aims for 80 percent emission reductions from 1990 levels by 2050 and calls for auctioning 100 percent of the pollution permits. It also includes a $150 billion investment to boost clean energy and create green jobs, along with fine-grained proposals to boost efficiency, build a smart electricity grid, and encourage public transportation. Enviros have also applauded Obama\'s refusal to endorse a gas-tax holiday and his now somewhat qualified opposition to offshore oil drilling. Obama earned an 86 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters for his first three years representing Illinois in the U.S. Senate (a lower score than might have been because he missed some votes while campaigning for president).
Read an interview with Barack Obama by Grist and Outside.
Key Points
- Calls for cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Would accomplish this through a cap-and-trade system that would auction off 100 percent of emissions permits, making polluters pay for the CO2 they emit.
- Would channel revenue raised from auctioning emissions permits -- between $30 billion and $50 billion a year -- toward developing and deploying clean energy technology, creating "green jobs," and helping low-income Americans afford higher energy bills.
- Calls for 25 percent of U.S. electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025, and for 30 percent of the federal government\'s electricity to come from renewables by 2020.
- Proposes investing $150 billion over 10 years in R&D for renewables, biofuels, efficiency, "clean coal," and other clean tech.
- Calls for improving energy efficiency in the U.S. 50 percent by 2030.
- Calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2022 and 60 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2030.
- Calls for all new buildings in the U.S. to be carbon neutral by 2030.
- Calls for reducing U.S. oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels a day, by 2030.
- Introduced the Health Care for Hybrids Act, which would have the federal government help cover health-care costs for retired U.S. autoworkers in exchange for domestic auto companies investing at least 50 percent of the savings into production of more fuel-efficient vehicles.
- Supports raising fuel-economy standards for automobiles to 40 miles per gallon and light trucks to 32 mpg by 2020.
- Supports a phaseout of incandescent light bulbs by 2014.
- Cosponsor of the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act. After being badgered by MoveOn and other progressives over the issue, he "clarified" his position by saying he would support liquefied coal only if it emitted 20 percent less carbon over its lifecycle than conventional fuels.
- Has been endorsed by Friends of the Earth Action, in part for his opposition to a summer "gas-tax holiday" that McCain and Clinton support. (FoE Action had previously endorsed John Edwards.)
Video & Audio
Watch part of Obama\'s Oct. 8, 2007, energy policy speech in Portsmouth, N.H.:
Watch Obama\'s May 7, 2007, speech to the Detroit Economic Club, in which he calls on automakers to manufacture more efficient cars:
Watch Obama answer a question about nuclear power at the CNN/YouTube debate on July 23, 2007:
Watch Obama offer a different perspective on nuclear power at an Iowa campaign rally on Dec. 31, 2007:
Listen to Obama\'s Sept. 20, 2006, speech on energy independence [MP3], part of a MoveOn Progressive Vision Series:
Listen to a clip of Obama\'s interview with Grist and Outside:
Quotable Quotes
- "I've put forward one of the most aggressive proposals out there [on climate change], but the science seems to be coming in indicating it's accelerating even more quickly with every passing day. And by the time I take office, I think we're going to have to have a serious conversation about how drastic steps we need to take to address it."
-- Dec. 4, 2007, during a Democratic debate
- "We are not acting as good stewards of God's Earth when our bottom line puts the size of our profits before the future of our planet."
-- Oct. 14, 2007, in a speech at an interfaith forum on climate change
- "Businesses don't own the sky, the public does, and if we want them to stop polluting it, we have to put a price on all pollution. It's time to make the cleaner way of doing business the more profitable way of doing business."
-- Oct. 8, 2007, in an energy policy speech in Portsmouth, N.H.
- "Saying that America is addicted to oil without following a real plan for energy independence is like admitting alcoholism and then skipping out on the 12-step program."
-- April 2, 2006, in a speech at the Associated Press' annual luncheon, referring to President Bush's 2006 State of the Union address
- "The auto industry is on a path that is unacceptable and unsustainable -- for their business, for their workers, and for America. And America must take action to make it right. ... For too long, we've been either too afraid to ask our automakers to meet higher fuel standards or unwilling to help them do it. But the truth is ... we have to do both. We must demand that they revamp their production, we must assist that transition, and we must make the choice to buy these cars when we have the option."
-- May 7, 2007, in a speech to the Detroit Economic Club
- "If we're going to have timber industries operating on public land then we should make sure that old-growth forests aren't destroyed but it's that second growth are what are harvested."
-- May 24, 2008, in an interview with the Beacon newspaper
- "I think how we treat our animals reflects how we treat each other. And it's very important that we have a president who is mindful of the cruelty that is perpetrated on animals."
One year after his election, Obama on verge of audaciously fulfilling his promise as the green FDR
Obama energy speech contained few policy specifics, but shaped forward-looking narrative
Comments
View as Threaded
peapack Posted 2:12 am
01 Aug 2007
-the coal still has to be mined
-it still has to be shipped
-the waste products have to be shipped
-sequestering the carbon in underground mines and shafts will require energy expenditure
With net energy gain reduced by these processes, you're better off with wind and solar.
Permalink
cebnalb Posted 4:34 am
08 Jan 2008
Watch the movie "POISON DUST", see what your government is doing with the nuclear waste.
There is a reason the corporate media was hyping Obama and Hillary before Hillary even announced that she was running, because they have sold out to the New World Order; and the owners of the FEDERAL RESERVE approve of Obama and Clinton.
Only Kucinich has an environmentally sound plan for the U.S., but the corporations that rule this fascist country will not let Kucinich be heard.
And you "Progressives" are OK with that?
"Hello? Is there anybody in there?"-Pink Floyd
Permalink
crumbrye Posted 4:39 am
08 Jan 2008
Permalink
GonzoDon Posted 4:38 am
12 Jan 2008
The important thing is to get the major obstacles out of the way. Obstacles like Bush. Cheney. Julie MacDonald. Gale Norton. The increasingly reactionary members of the Supreme Court. The increasingly corporate-controlled media.
These are obstacles that need to be removed one brick at a time, deliberately and painstakingly. This takes work, time, patience, persistence.
This won't happen overnight. There is no single political savior out there. There never will be. The people have to lead. The people have to vote in supportive Senate and House candidates that will encourage rather than discourage our commander-in-chief to make progress on environmental issues. The people have to support think tanks and environmental organizations and media outlets that are eager to speak truth to power and wrestle with difficult environmental questions.
At that point, even imperfect politicians will have to either get on board or get out of the way. Similar to the United States' reluctant signing-on last month to the international agreement to address climate change.
At some point, even self-serving swine like the Bush Administration, if unable to do anything progressive, will at least get out of the way and quit being obstructionists.
Permalink
CottonTop Posted 10:55 am
15 Jan 2008
Permalink
TitanGreens Posted 1:01 am
17 Jan 2008
Check out how Barack Obama fared...
http://titancast.titantv.com/afdfefb5bcec4ccca2f2e5a9ec40 ...
Permalink
econpolyeco Posted 9:30 am
05 Feb 2008
Permalink
racc Posted 1:03 pm
06 Feb 2008
Permalink
greengo Posted 2:13 am
10 Feb 2008
http://greengolingo.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-letter-to-s ...
Enough of this failure to be clear and straightforward on his stance.
Permalink
homeboy Posted 6:53 pm
24 Feb 2008
I'm very interested in seeing your "poison dust" documentary... I'm open minded and realize money plays too much of a role in most organizations including the energy sector and our government as well. I have a feeling this film won't be too much of a surprise. By the way, did you get a chance to see the Barack Obama Yes We Can video? This was totally unpaid for, and was created by people who's time is very valuable. People feel compelled to help Obama not because of the media hype.. but because they feel he is truly going to let the voice of the American people finally get heard. I understand you're hesitation on why he seems so popular... everyone should be skeptical and should research the candidates themselves.. even some professors are having discussions as to why Obama is so popular. People are finding it tough to believe after the crap we put up with with Bush, that a real human could be put into office.
Surely, Obama might not yet have thought completely about all the environmental issues... noone can go into office with all the answers for everything. I just hope, just as you do, that after being elected that he finds out all these other things that you mentioned, or otherwise that need to be addressed as well. One thing he realizes I think that gives me comfort to believe this is that he understands he doesn't know everything and Barack Obama is appointing people in positions that he doesn't know much about, but knows there must be someone to inform him about possible issues.
Sorry for the rant, but I think Obama is a huge step in the right direction... regardless of whether he knows all the issues or not.
Permalink
zachrd99 Posted 1:02 pm
03 Nov 2008
http://www.poweredgreen.com/
Permalink