John McCain gave a speech on nuclear security this morning at the University of Denver, and given his abiding love of nuclear power as the solution to climate change, that came up too. Where there's "civilian" nuclear energy, there's the possibility for nuclear weapons -- and if he's promoting the former, that leads to plenty of questions about how to prevent the latter. And of course, all that spent nuclear fuel has to go somewhere. His remarks:
As we improve the national and multilateral tools to catch and reverse illicit nuclear programs, I am convinced civilian nuclear energy can be a critical part of our fight against global warming. Civilian nuclear power provides a way for the United States and other responsible nations to achieve energy independence and reduce our dependence on foreign oil and gas. But in order to take advantage of civilian nuclear energy, we must do a better job of ensuring it remains civilian. Some nations use the pretense of civilian nuclear programs as cover for nuclear weapons programs. We need to build an international consensus that exposes this deception, and holds nations accountable for it. We cannot continue allowing nations to enrich and reprocess uranium, ostensibly for civilian purposes, and stand by impotently as they develop weapons programs.
The most effective way to prevent this deception is to limit the further spread of enrichment and reprocessing. To persuade countries to forego enrichment and reprocessing, I would support international guarantees of nuclear fuel supply to countries that renounce enrichment and reprocessing, as well as the establishment of multinational nuclear enrichment centers in which they can participate. Nations that seek nuclear fuel for legitimate civilian purposes will be able to acquire what they need under international supervision. This is one suggestion Russia and others have made to Iran. Unfortunately, the Iranian government has so far rejected this idea. Perhaps with enough outside pressure and encouragement, they can be persuaded to change their minds before it is too late. I would seek to establish an international repository for spent nuclear fuel that could collect and safely store materials overseas that might otherwise be reprocessed to acquire bomb-grade materials. It is even possible that such an international center could make it unnecessary to open the proposed spent nuclear fuel storage facility at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. [emphasis mine]
One can't help but wonder who decides what constitutes "responsible," and where, exactly, this huge international nuclear repository would be located.
New nukes? A fair shot, not a free ride
David Frum says ‘Conservatives Heart Nuke Power.’
Cautious optimism for Copenhagen deal as Barcelona climate talks end
Comments
View as Flat
GRLCowan Posted 6:15 am
27 May 2008
It would have been a long way around for them, for it is much easier to build a small isotope production reactor than a power reactor and easier to extract plutonium from uranium irradiated to low burnup in such a reactor than to extract it from spent fuel, which is necessarily high-burnup.
Spent fuel plutonium is, in theory, much harder to make into bombs than plutonium from uranium irradiated to low-burnup. The above-mentioned increased difficulty of getting it in the first place, compared to getting plutonium from small low-temperature low-burnup reactors, seems to have ensured that no-one has tried to overcome the theoretical difficulties.
--- G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996
http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html
Permalink
billgee Posted 7:27 am
27 May 2008
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:53 pm
27 May 2008
McCain is daft. His slightly better level of awareness of his surroundings than the shaved chimp has, will be negated by the daftness factor.
To yield a third bushco term in office. Phil Gramm evidently passed a bill making investment houses, "banks". A wall that had existed since the depression, to protect against another depression was torn down.
It struck me as strange when the media started talking about the fed bailing out investment "banks".
"Since when are those hedge fund gambling partners 'banks' that come under federal protection", I said to myself (or maybe on the blog?). Well since Gramm passed this bill in the middle of the night.
It also gave a sheen of respectability to the faulty mortgage bundling instruments that these firms were peddling, that caused the mortgage crisis and global credit crisis.
Gramm is bush-lite's (mccain) economic advisor. Still trust McCain to plan the future of nuclear power? I bet he knows as much about nukes as he knows about economics.
Just enough to ask lobbyists like Gramm what he should do. Yikes.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink