"I really would like to vote for this bill because we desperately need an energy bill. The world and particularly the United States faces a real challenge on energy in the future. But I cannot vote for this bill primarily because of the corn ethanol mandate. A recent article in The Economist noted that our use of corn for ethanol doubled the price of corn about a year ago. Farmers then moved lands from soybeans and what would have been in soybeans and wheat to corn. We now have further increased the cost of corn and we've increased the cost of soybeans and wheat the world around. And one of the members of the United Nations says what we've done is a crime against humanity. The effect we've had on gasoline use has been absolutely trifling. The National Academy of Sciences says that if we converted all of our corn, all of our corn, to ethanol and discounted for fossil fuel input it would displace 2.4% of our gasoline. Mr. Chairman, this really represents one of those times as the old farmer says that 'the juice ain't worth the squeezing.' We can do better."
-- Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.), on why he voted against HR-6, the energy bill passed today by the House of Representatives
The localization of agriculture
Annie Leonard misses the mark in her new video, “The Story of Cap-and-Trade”
EPA punts on raising ethanol “blend wall”
Comments
View as Flat
wesrolley Posted 12:46 pm
18 Dec 2007
Officials forecast US wheat stocks would shrink to their lowest level in 60 years, dropping from 312m bushels to 280m by the end of the 2007-08 crop year. Take a look at every packaged food you pick up and see how many contain "high fructose corn syrup". We will pay for this new energy bill in the grocery store.
We may not have the time for incremental gains in one area (CAFE) when we give them back in others. This is yet another reasons that I firmly believe that there needs to be an alternative to corporate Democrats that is not spelled "Republican."
Wes Rolley
CoChair - EcoAction Committee
Green Party US
Permalink
Ekirky Posted 1:41 pm
18 Dec 2007
So any increase in the price of corn would seem like a very good thing...
and yet ethanol is dumb on so many levels.
Short-sighted government policy created our corn surplus in the first place, at great enviornmental and societal cost. Now short-sighted government policy is going to dispose of that surplus in the dumbest possible way.
ARGGHHH.
Permalink
Ron Steenblik Posted 4:55 pm
18 Dec 2007
Permalink
bookerly Posted 5:58 pm
18 Dec 2007
Congrats to Congressman Bartlett!! I will tell my parents that a Republican has said something I agree with!!
Shame on those in both parties who have sold us out for their pockets full of gold (campaign gold that is!).
patrick in Beijing
Permalink
bookerly Posted 7:06 pm
18 Dec 2007
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/17/europe/food.php
Ethanol will kill the poor.
patrick in Beijing
Permalink