"The Arctic is often cited as the canary in the coal mine for climate warming. Now as a sign of climate warming, the canary has died. It is time to start getting out of the coal mines."
-- NASA climate scientist Jay Zwally
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success 10 Posted 1 day, 8 hours ago
What to make of the new climate poll 16 Posted 1 day, 18 hours ago
Will Africa’s farmland become a ‘resource curse’? 7 Posted 2 days, 1 hour ago
"The Arctic is often cited as the canary in the coal mine for climate warming. Now as a sign of climate warming, the canary has died. It is time to start getting out of the coal mines."
-- NASA climate scientist Jay Zwally
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Threaded
caniscandida Posted 8:01 pm
12 Dec 2007
<<
"The Arctic is screaming," said Mark Serreze, senior scientist at the government's snow and ice data center in Boulder, Colo.
>>
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
stevenearlsalmony Posted 1:57 am
13 Dec 2007
Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population
http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/
Permalink
damead Posted 5:30 am
13 Dec 2007
Permalink
jsflescher Posted 7:59 pm
13 Dec 2007
"Glaciers serve as the canaries in the coal mine. I grew up in West Virginia, where coal mining was an important part of the state's economy. Coal miners would take canaries down in a cage. If the canary died, they would get out of the mine, because it meant methane gas was building up in the system."
thanks for the quote.
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
//
var l=new Array();
var output = '';
l[0]='>';l[1]='a';l[2]='/';l[3]='';l[25]='\"';l[26]=' 109';l[27]=' 111';l[28]=' 99';l[29]=' 46';l[30]=' 111';l[31]=' 111';l[32]=' 104';l[33]=' 97';l[34]=' 121';l[35]=' 64';l[36]=' 114';l[37]=' 101';l[38]=' 104';l[39]=' 99';l[40]=' 115';l[41]=' 101';l[42]=' 108';l[43]=' 102';l[44]=' 115';l[45]=' 106';l[46]=':';l[47]='o';l[48]='t';l[49]='l';l[50]='i';l[51]='a';l[52]='m';l[53]='\"';l[54]='=';l[55]='f';l[56]='e';l[57]='r';l[58]='h';l[59]='a ';l[60]='
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 8:32 pm
13 Dec 2007
But these things are not balanced against one another, numerically and quantitatively, as so much book-keeping. Even if we judge the survival of many human beings to have been a greater good than was the death of the canary an evil, nevertheless, it remains an eternal fact that the canary was exploited and abused.
So with the warming Arctic: It must not be considered an ethically neutral warning sign. The more the Arctic ecosystems are radically altered on account of warming, with adverse effects on living creatures, the more real evil is done.
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink