“The erroneous belief that stabilizing emissions would quickly stabilize the climate supports wait-and-see policies but violates basic laws of physics.”
—Dr. John Sterman, risk analyst at the Sloan School of Business, M.I.T.
Why buying cheap energy certificates worsens climate change 16 Posted 12 hours, 24 minutes ago
Do diesel-based farmers dream of electric tractors? 6 Posted 7 hours, 15 minutes ago
Copenhagen climate summit (part 1): the expectations 0 Posted 10 hours, 56 minutes ago
Notable quotable
“The erroneous belief that stabilizing emissions would quickly stabilize the climate supports wait-and-see policies but violates basic laws of physics.”
—Dr. John Sterman, risk analyst at the Sloan School of Business, M.I.T.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
sindark Posted 1:00 am
29 Jan 2009
As this speech demonstrates, even some very senior officials do not appreciate that stabilizing climate actually requires:
http://www.ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=6F2DE1CA-1& ...
More discussion of this is here:
http://www.sindark.com/2009/01/22/what-it-means-to-stabil ...
a sibilant intake of breath
Permalink