Not just good policy: practical politics, too

Shifting military spending to fund green infrastructure 7

Last Saturday, I spoke at the Public Interest Environmental Law Conference. I argued that diverting military spending to green infrastructure is not only good policy but good politics as well. This is a Google presentation version of the PowerPoint slide show I gave.

I gave a second short PowerPoint comparing emissions trading to rule-based regulation, also now a Google presentation.

Please note that, though web-based, Google presentations are not standard web pages. They need as much screen real estate as you can give -- usually including zooming your browser to full-screen mode.

Gar Lipow, a long time environmental activist and journalist with a strong technical background has spent years immersed in the subject of efficiency and renewable energy. He has written extensively on the economics of solving the global warming, and why pricing externalities (though important) cannot be the main driver of such solutions.

His on-line reference book compiling information on technology available today, “No Hair Shirt Solutions to Global Warming”, is available at http://www.nohairshirts.com.

His articles on the economics and politics of solving the climate crisis have been published in Z magazine and a number of small journals.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. GreyFlcn Posted 5:17 am
    14 Mar 2008

    You mean graphs like this?http://greyfalcon.net/iraqvsenergy.png
  2. Reformed Republican Posted 6:05 am
    14 Mar 2008

    of course it is a good ideaSwitching military funding to almost anything other than military is a good idea. An even better idea would be to cut the military funding and cut taxes to balance it out. Then money can actually be used productively.
  3. Gar Lipow's avatar

    Gar Lipow Posted 7:12 am
    14 Mar 2008

    Cut taxes?"...An even better idea would be to cut the military funding and cut taxes to balance it out..."
    In Orwell's Animal Farm, the sheep bleated "Four Legs Good. Two Legs Bad" .
    I'd say the 21st equivalent is to bleat "Private Good. Public Bad."
    Or do you want to explain how tax cuts will build railroads, utility lines, smart grids and other stuff that really can't be done via pure individual investment. Also why public fire departments are inefficient and should be privatize to optimize themselves in a competitive market.

  4. Gar Lipow's avatar

    Gar Lipow Posted 7:14 am
    14 Mar 2008

    GreyFlcn - Great Graph.If your browser does what mine does and shrinks it to a dot, zoom on the thing. Full size, it is a high impact graph.
  5. GreyFlcn Posted 7:24 am
    14 Mar 2008

    Hate to say itCurrently the way they fund military spending is through:



    Deficit Spending

    Interest payed via Income Taxes


    Considering this would be:



    A Progressive Tax

    Foot the bill to future generations who would benefit from the climate mitigation.


    It's actually crazy enough to work, even without the substitution of matching military funds.
    _
    As argued by "WonderingMind42" one really wonders if worrying about "Spending too much" is rational.
    We're either going to spend too much, or spend too little.
    Given those two options, (yes a dichotomy), it would seem prudent to take the safer choice.  Even if it might lead to wasted dollars.
    _
    Especially when you consider, investments in Infrastructure usually pay strong dividends, atleast in the long run.
  6. GreyFlcn Posted 7:29 am
    14 Mar 2008

    One could even sayOne could even say that global warming is a "Growing Unpredictable Global Threat to National Security"
  7. Colin Wright Posted 5:42 am
    16 Mar 2008

    Gar, thanks for posting these...great presentations. Always interested in how they went down and any other observations about this year's Environmental Law Conference.
    BTW, you probably already know that the Green Festivals are expanding to Seattle this year. Here are the dates:
    Seattle: April 12-13

    Chicago: May 17-18

    DC: Nov 8-9

    SF: Nov 16-18
    I'm particularly looking forward to Thom Hartman, John Perkins, Richard Heinberg, Maude Barlow, Frances Moore-Lappe...

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement