Last Saturday, I spoke at the Public Interest Environmental Law Conference. I argued that diverting military spending to green infrastructure is not only good policy but good politics as well. This is a Google presentation version of the PowerPoint slide show I gave.
I gave a second short PowerPoint comparing emissions trading to rule-based regulation, also now a Google presentation.
Please note that, though web-based, Google presentations are not standard web pages. They need as much screen real estate as you can give -- usually including zooming your browser to full-screen mode.
Gar Lipow, a long time environmental activist and journalist with a strong technical background has spent years immersed in the subject of efficiency and renewable energy. He has written extensively on the economics of solving the global warming, and why pricing externalities (though important) cannot be the main driver of such solutions.
His on-line reference book compiling information on technology available today, “No Hair Shirt Solutions to Global Warming”, is available at http://www.nohairshirts.com.
His articles on the economics and politics of solving the climate crisis have been published in Z magazine and a number of small journals.
Comments
View as Flat
GreyFlcn Posted 5:17 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
Reformed Republican Posted 6:05 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
Gar Lipow Posted 7:12 am
14 Mar 2008
In Orwell's Animal Farm, the sheep bleated "Four Legs Good. Two Legs Bad" .
I'd say the 21st equivalent is to bleat "Private Good. Public Bad."
Or do you want to explain how tax cuts will build railroads, utility lines, smart grids and other stuff that really can't be done via pure individual investment. Also why public fire departments are inefficient and should be privatize to optimize themselves in a competitive market.
Permalink
Gar Lipow Posted 7:14 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 7:24 am
14 Mar 2008
Deficit Spending
Interest payed via Income Taxes
Considering this would be:
A Progressive Tax
Foot the bill to future generations who would benefit from the climate mitigation.
It's actually crazy enough to work, even without the substitution of matching military funds.
_
As argued by "WonderingMind42" one really wonders if worrying about "Spending too much" is rational.
We're either going to spend too much, or spend too little.
Given those two options, (yes a dichotomy), it would seem prudent to take the safer choice. Even if it might lead to wasted dollars.
_
Especially when you consider, investments in Infrastructure usually pay strong dividends, atleast in the long run.
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 7:29 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
Colin Wright Posted 5:42 am
16 Mar 2008
BTW, you probably already know that the Green Festivals are expanding to Seattle this year. Here are the dates:
Seattle: April 12-13
Chicago: May 17-18
DC: Nov 8-9
SF: Nov 16-18
I'm particularly looking forward to Thom Hartman, John Perkins, Richard Heinberg, Maude Barlow, Frances Moore-Lappe...
Permalink