This is a story about sludge, worms, and songbirds, and it starts in your bathroom cabinet.
When we treat our wastewater to remove "biosolids" -- a polite term for our human waste -- all sorts of other things end up in the leftover sludge, including the drugs we take and the "personal care products" like lotion, shampoo, makeup, and cologne that we slather on our bodies, which have been absorbed through our skin and then excreted in our waste. The treated wastewater is usually discharged into the local river, and the sludge that's been removed from it frequently becomes fertilizer for agricultural production.
Researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey have found that the hungry earthworms who feed on this sludge in farm fields contain concentrated levels of our drugs and personal care products in their bodies. In fact, a USGS study published in February found that the compounds bioaccumulate in earthworms, meaning that the worms bear higher levels of these pollutants than the surrounding soil does. The USGS researchers note that worms could become monitoring species to help us determine the relative pollution levels in soil, but state that the pollution in these worms have "unknown effects" for wildlife (read the story in Science News).
"Unknown" maybe in that particular study, but researchers in the U.K. published a disturbing study about a week later that provides some insight into what happens to the polluted worms: Birds eat them.
This particular study examined European starlings in the wild, who like to forage in farm fields where fertilizer from sewage sludge has been applied, because the soil is rich in earthworms and other organisms who are busy feasting on the nutrients in the fertilizer. But they're also feasting on the contaminants in the fertilizer, and those contaminants have an impact on the foraging birds (story in The New York Times).
The contaminants in sewage sludge can contain hormone-mimicking compounds that act like estrogen in the birds' bodies. (Following the thread here? Those compounds are the drugs and personal care products that the USGS was examining in the earlier study.)
The U.K. researchers found that the contaminants boosted development in the part of the male birds' brains that control their songs, making them sing longer and more complex songs. The researchers also found that female starlings preferred the long, complex songs of the contaminated male starlings.
The bad news is ... they're contaminated. The same endocrine-disrupting compounds in the male starlings that made them attractive as mates make them unfit as fathers, because the compounds suppress the birds' immune systems and make them sick. While that might be good news for American birders who aren't fond of invasive starlings, it's rather bad news for birds everywhere who like to eat worms. While that fat earthworm might taste good and improve a male songbird's chances of attracting a pretty lady bird, it could actually be crippling his chances of producing a healthy brood of babies.
This might seem like just a scientific curiosity if the same kinds of effects hadn't also been noted in many other species, including fish, reptiles, and amphibians. Sort of makes you think twice about that nice body spray in your bathroom cabinet that's supposed to make you more attractive to a mate, doesn't it?
Comments
View as Flat
caniscandida Posted 4:46 am
14 Mar 2008
In the last paragraph, "same kinds of effects" is not quite accurate for the three examples given. The example from reptiles, marine iguanas in the Galapagos, has to do with harm from an oil spill. The examples from fishes (the British roach, Rutilus rutilus) and amphibians (certain frogs) are closer, having to do with reproductive disruption caused by sexual re-expression as an effect of chemical-induced hormone imbalance. But with the European starlings, apparently the males and the females are getting along together and reproducing just fine, only the males are passing along some dangerous inheritable deficiencies, which is a problem of a different sort.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:56 am
14 Mar 2008
Other waste water can then be easily recycled. Saving even more water. All waste water not containing human waste can serve as irrigation water with simple lagoon treatment, covered in hot dry climates to prevent evaporation losses.
Drug compounds would break down in the digestor as water evaporates into the air. Oh well. Another simple solution that goes against the mass delusional corporate culture.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
Fawn Pattison Posted 5:25 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
Lisa Hymas Posted 5:35 am
14 Mar 2008
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 6:04 am
14 Mar 2008
But: The American Robin (Turdus migratorius -- and the genus name has nothing to do with its gross Anglo-Saxon look-alike, but is in fact the Latin word for "thrush") is a famous worm-eater, though perhaps we usually do not associate them with farms and fields.
On the other hand, very well known in Midwestern and Western states, and very photogenic, are the two Meadowlarks, the Eastern (Sturnella magna) and the Western (S. neglecta, a name that brings me to tears). I have never seen them here in the Northeast, though they are here, according to the range maps; I made their acquaintance the first time I visited Montana, by bus, in the late 1980s. Sibley says of the Eastern: "Feeds on seeds, insects, and worms."
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
willa Posted 12:52 pm
16 Mar 2008
I hate when various elements of my politics start fistfights with one another...
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 7:14 pm
16 Mar 2008
"Hormone-mimicking substances" is a rather harder concept to understand.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 2:06 am
17 Mar 2008
Aerobic composting toilets evaporate the water from the waste, concentrating the chemical compounds in the biomass/active bacteria, where they are broken down. The evaporation is caused by air flow through the system and heat generated by the bacteria.
The solution of chemicals in water passes right through most waste treatment systems or home based septic tanks.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
Sam Wells Posted 3:55 am
17 Mar 2008
Amazing is right that most of the chemicals we're talking here squirt right through the digesters. The system is tuned to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, and other compounds found in amounts of parts per million - some of these nasty pharma compounds can be parts per billion or trillion. Note that Austin does say not to eat the dirt (ha!) or vegetables growing in it.
And I appreciate Canis on the birds. Our spring migration is just starting here by the Mexico border ... we have yet to see a Worm Eating Warbler yet this year. Many birds such as the Redwing Blackbird will graze for bugs and worms (thousands of them here now). The Grackle, a very social by nasty back bird, will eat anything, including worms. /sammie
Onward through the fog
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:15 am
17 Mar 2008
Confining the toxic portion of the plumbing and breakdown process to air powered systems for flushing and digesting, would leave regular sewer water easily recyclable in a series of wetland holding ponds. The water would then be suitable for irrigation. Irrigating greenhouses would allow solar and geo heat exchange powered distillation of the water to render it fit for human consumption.
Or it could be filtered using renewable energy.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 7:13 am
17 Mar 2008
Red-winged Blackbirds are wonderful examples, very photogenic. I know them from the seashore wetlands of southern New Jersey.
Icteridae includes the blackbirds, the meadowlarks, the grackles and the orioles. As a suggestion to Lisa Hymas, I was looking for a bird both photogenic and with a memorable voice. Meadowlarks fit the bill, as definitely do red-winged blackbirds.
I have nothing against grackles, but they are rather intense and uncompromising, shall we say, who rarely appear on people's lists of "My Favorite Birds."
Orioles are well-loved, with a nice whistle, and they surely will eat worms. But I do not know if they go after worms especially, or if they frequent farm fields at all.
As for Warblers: I hate them. Which they should not take personally. In fact, they are gems, and it is always thrilling to spot one. But I am not a naturalist, nor an outdoorsman, nor a truly dedicated birder, so I have no patience to go trailing after them with my binoculars, getting more and more sea-sick, through the understory of a forest.
The Worm-eating Warbler (Helmitheros vermivora: "worm-hunter" in Greek, followed by "worm-eating" in Latin) may be not quite what we are looking for, anyhow, in spite of its perhaps inaccurate name. Sibley says:
<<
Migrants found mainly in wooded understory, probing dead leaf clusters and vine tangles for insects and spiders.
>>
So: no open fields for this bird, and worms are not the preferred item on the menu.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 10:06 am
16 Jun 2008
Why buy fertilizer from russia and mining corporations that hold monopoly control over it? When it could be recycled from urine, that would more than pay for safely breaking down all the toxic compunds and recycling the water.
Saving wildlife. And cutting food prices that are soaring due to weather extremes, chemical fertilizer prices, energy prices, and fuel farming ethanol.
The Green network is really pretty good at times.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink