More than one way to raise a hog

Hog farms can benefit rural agriculture and community 6

I spent last Thanksgiving on a 320-acre farm in Pocahontas County, Iowa where Jerry Depew grows corn and soybeans, and for more than 10 years, has also raised hogs. Jerry never has more than several hundred hogs at a time, and while this used to be commonplace on Iowa farms, most small and mid-sized hog operations in the state were lost during massive industry consolidation over the last 15 years.

Jerry's hogs remained because he raises them differently.

The hogs I saw on Jerry's farm lived in hoop houses. These pole-supported buildings have a partial concrete floor (the rest is dirt), plenty of room for the pigs to move around, and open sides to let lots of fresh air circulate.

Jerry's sows have never seen anything like gestation crates, which keep pregnant pigs tightly confined and unable to turn around.  On Jerry's farm, mama pigs roam around on a pasture, munch on oats, and give birth in small farrowing huts, which they can enter and exit at will. They are kept in the pasture by one low electric wire six inches off the ground, and many of the sows had just given birth as we showed up.

I had never seen a newborn piglet, so I went out to the pasture and opened a farrowing hut to take some pictures. While the sow got to her feet when I cracked the door, she remained calm and the piglets grouped around her and away from the cold air I let into their hut. Jerry's son told me that you can tell a good sow by how it lays down -- the slower her movements, the more time her babies have to get out of her way and the less chance they have of her crushing them.

Fast forward nine months to a conversation with a friend who sells hog feeders to giant confinement operations. After I told him about being in the pasture with those sows a day after they had given birth, he reacted with surprise because he thought the sows would have reacted aggressively while I was in the pasture. It occurred to me that he didn't account for the stress sows in confinement are under that amplifies their behavior.

It doesn't have to be this way.

I haven't been a vegetarian for a number of years, mostly because some of my family and good friends are farmers who raise livestock. They do their best to treat their animals humanely and with respect, and I want to support their efforts to change the food system. I also was moved several years ago by an excerpt from An Agricultural Testament by Sir Albert Howard:

Mother Earth never attempts to farm without livestock; she always raises mixed crops; the mixed vegetable and animal wastes are converted into humus; there is no waste; the processes of growth and the processes of decay balance one another; both plants and animals are left to protect themselves against disease.

When I lived in Washington, D.C., sticking to this diet of meat that reflected my values was easy. The Dupont Circle farmers market was open year round and situated a half-mile from my house, and I knew that my friends at Cedarbrook Farm and Eco-Friendly Foods were raising and slaughtering their animals in ways I would approve. But when I moved to Nebraska, I found that this kind of meat is more difficult to find, and occasionally I would eat the meat that is available.

After a recent tour of a confined animal feeding operation in North Carolina, my resolve to know my meat became much stronger. There are ways to raise meat that sustain our environment instead of polluting it and to help family farmers and communities thrive.

An unconsolidated livestock market made of many small and mid-sized independent family farmers built vibrant rural communities across this country. When the income from raising livestock is distributed to many farmers that money is often spent largely within the community. Income isn't the only thing that small and mid-sized farms help to spread around -- manure in the quantities produced on these farms is solid instead of liquid, and can be composted and spread on fields in quantities crops can readily use.

Sadly, even as the demand for naturally-raised meat is soaring, consolidation of the livestock industry has made the pork market unresponsive to high corn prices, so that even the premium Jerry receives for raising natural meat isn't enough to be profitable.

Since I was at his farm last Thanksgiving, Jerry has sold his sows and plowed up his pasture. It doesn't mean he won't ever have hogs again ... his buildings are still standing for now, and if the price goes back up he may buy more sows and start again. He can do this because he his hoop houses, unlike confinement buildings, did not require a lot of money to build. Farmers with large amounts of debt need to pay off their buildings regardless of hog prices, so they keep producing even if they cannot make a profit.

There is an opportunity here, however. We know that small and mid-sized family farmers can be revived, and that they can sustain both our environment and our communities. We must work for policy that breaks up the concentration in livestock markets and restores ownership and control to farmers. Policy changes don't occur overnight, so while we work we should also support farmers today who raise animals responsibly and in ways that create opportunity within their communities.

Now, that is something I can stick a fork in.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. GreenEngineer Posted 6:31 am
    16 Oct 2008

    pastureThe answer to high feed prices in beef operations is intensive, high-frequency pasture rotation systems, which build soil as well as providing good nutrition for the animals.
    I wonder if anyone has tried doing something similar with hogs?  What I have in mind is a "pasture" that is actually an orchard of mixed fruit and nut trees/bushes, selected for high productivity and nutrition.  Let the fruit fall, and the hogs munch it up.  The problem, of course, is that it takes much longer to establish "pasture" of this sort than one made of grass.  And I have no idea if this is workable in practice.  I am just curious to know if anyone has tried it on a commercial or semi-commercial scale.
  2. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 7:45 am
    16 Oct 2008

    Laws mandating a 40 hour work week did not wreck the economy. Neither did laws mandating air pollution controls on cars.
    Improved laws governing production of animal products would be a good thing also. If all farmers had to meet the same standards they would all profit equally--a level playing field.
    The question is, would the consumer pay more? The answer is probably yes, but I don't think it would be enough to cause hardship to lower income citizens. Catalytic converters on cars also increase their cost. At worst, it would decrease meat consumption but we Americans eat an unhealthy amount of meat as it is.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  3. Pangolin's avatar

    Pangolin Posted 8:07 am
    16 Oct 2008

    Oak, walnut, apple, persimmon....plums, chestnut, mulberry and hickory might do it. Here in California a heavy acorn crop can drop nuts that drift several inches deep.
    Of course the real trick anywhere is finding ways of preserving enough feed so that the livestock that can thrive on summers windfalls can make it through the winter.
    The deer and wild boar around here do it but I don't know how.

    Put the Carbon Back
  4. Annimal Posted 7:41 pm
    16 Oct 2008

    Pigs are very intelligentI'm glad there exist " happy pig" farming.

    As a matter of fact pigs are among the 4 most intelligent animals on the Earth.
    I have a friend who has a pet pig. Sometimes they go out with a leash ....the pig is very clean , as a dog...
    " We commit crimes with the way we keep pigs and other farm animals caged "
  5. Jones Posted 1:12 am
    17 Oct 2008

    the right amount of the right stuff = good eatin'I heartily agree with Howard's sentiment here:
    "Mother Earth never attempts to farm without livestock; she always raises mixed crops..."
    I would point out that Mother Nature raises a lot of vegetables for every animal. I figure our own diet ought to reflect that ratio. Less meat, better raised, seems like it's definitely the way to go.
    In the past two years I've significantly cut down the amount of meat in my diet. Once I'd tackled the quantity, I then focussed on improving the quality of the meat--organic, outdoor-reared, etc. I pay more per pound, but it's worth it on the taste alone. Not to mention the health benefits of eating less meat. Or the warm, fuzzy feeling of moral superiority. And because it's a 50% increase in price, but a 67% decrease in quantity, I'm still saving money. It's a real tri- or quadri-fecta.
    The takeaway from this is twofold. First, that paying higher prices for better meat can benefit, rather than punish, the individual. Second, that sustainably meaty eating is thus a viable option for most people, right now. No need to badger the govt--create your own demand.
  6. Storm Dragon Posted 5:54 am
    17 Oct 2008

    Human-pig relationshipsUndoubtedly, a sow's demeanor has a lot to do with her living environment, but her relationship with her caretakers may be an important factor, as well.  A neighbor of mine, with experience in these matters, tells me that if you want to raise pigs, it's a good plan to make a pet of your brood sow-something that just doesn't happen in  large-scale operations with thousands of animals.  

    Let the jaguars return!

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement