Microgrid porn

You know you love it 3

This AP story is a bit old but it's incredibly significant so I'm going to go ahead and get in a tizzy about it.

It's about efforts by the city of Stamford, Conn. (among other places) to establish a micro grid district. What's that, you ask?

Within these special zones, sometimes referred to as "energy independence districts," businesses, government buildings and office buildings can design and create their own power source, such as a fuel cell or natural gas generator, using the electric grid only as a backup. They might also tap into underground aquifers and use that water for heating and cooling purposes, or even install solar panels to capture more energy.

The entities in the district would essentially plan an electrical system that uses the energy efficiently, based on their needs. For example, a hotel and office building might team up, with the hotel needing electricity more at night and the office building needing it more during the day.

Stamford's immediate motivation is escaping reliance on a shaky electricity grid that's causing more and more blackouts, to the city's great detriment. After all, corporations don't want to locate in your town if they can't rely on the power.

However, I suspect once these things start spreading, other benefits will manifest -- at both the town and state level -- and soon the demand for a smarter, more flexible grid will become universal.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. GreenEngineer Posted 4:02 am
    04 May 2007

    smart gridsThis scheme is highly complementary to the idea of smart grids (or "electranets" as Gore puts it).  Right now the grid is so heavily interconnected that it is very hard to change just part of it, and it's too damn big to change all of it at once.  Breaking out pieces of it as microgrids, however, have many advantages:



    Better opportunities for cogeneration, with less regulatory red tape.

    Better opportunities to use locally available resources, and tailor supply to local demand

    Better security and stability, versus both sabotage or accidents.

    The ability to implement innovative measures, like demand response systems, on a small scale.  This makes the task manageable, and it also confines the damage that can be done by the inevitable mistakes that will be made along with way.


    Yeah, I'd say a high tizzy factor is definitely warranted.
  2. David Roberts's avatar

    David Roberts Posted 4:12 am
    04 May 2007

    Also:5. Hacking. Once you put this kind of control in the hands of thousands of individuals, some of them are going to come up with widgets, solutions, kludges, and jerry-rigs that we can't possibly anticipate in advance.

    grist.org
  3. JMG's avatar

    JMG Posted 4:49 am
    04 May 2007

    Resources for those interested in moreOne book that has powerfully shaped the thinking on this question is Lovins et al.'s "Small is Profitable," a spendy fat book that's hard to find but worth it.
    And I found a new one at the library the other day, so I can't vouch for it except to note that Lovins has a positive blurb on the back cover:  It's called "The Grid: a journey through the heart of our electrified world" by Phillip F. Schewe.  Skimming it, it looks like one of the many books in the great new genre where a writer will look at how a common material (salt, coffee, ...) or tool (tv, computers, the telegraph) creates a huge wave of social change.  I'm really looking forward to it.

    "An optimist is someone who thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist is someone who is afraid that the optimist is right."

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement