Sea-ice melt in the Arctic this year was the second-largest on record, falling just short of 2007's all-time record melt, according to scientists at the National Snow and Ice Data Center. The slightly larger ice cover this year is hardly cause for celebration, though; sea ice may have covered more of the ocean's surface overall, but the ice also appeared to be thinner and weaker than in previous years. "This year, compared to last year, it looks as though there are more broken floes with water between them, at least in certain areas. Last year there was a more solid ice pack of one connected sheet," said Walt Meier of NSIDC. "The disconnected ice floes are potentially more vulnerable, indicating a weaker and more dispersed ice pack." This year's melt was 33 percent below the 1979-2000 average, and for the first time since records began, both the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea shipping routes were ice-free at the same time. "[P]eople might be tempted to call [the increased sea ice] a recovery, but I don't think that's a good term, we're still on a downwards trend toward ice-free Arctic summers."
Go Without the Floe
2008 Arctic sea-ice melt second-meltiest ever 2
-
Posted 10:52 AM on 17 Sep 2008
-
Posted in
-
Read More About
Related Stories
Cautious optimism for Copenhagen deal as Barcelona climate talks end
Another coal plant bites the dust
Barcelona outcome: White House strategy is plea for more time
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
GonzoDon Posted 12:08 pm
17 Sep 2008
In my relatively short lifetime, the global population has increased by about 135%. How long can that continue? Do you think over-exploitation of our resources (soil, water, fish, forests) could have, um, something to do with that exponential growth? Global warming, too?
Grist!!!! For God's sake when are you going to start reporting on stories that address exponential population growth pressures on our tiny planet?
You have ignored several mainstream stories on the issue in just the last couple of weeks.
How long will you continue to ignore the elephant in the room?
Permalink
wreckenhavoc Posted 1:20 pm
17 Sep 2008
Permalink