Me and Lester Brown 5

Comments View as Flat

1. 

   Biodiversivist Posted 6:05 am
   08 Feb 2006

   Try these on for sizeLarge shipments of low-cost biodiesel from South America have already begun to show up in Florida ports. Brazil has plans to build a biofuel pipeline capable of transporting a billion gallons of ethanol a year. Brazil has also lost 10,000 square miles of rainforest in the last two years. Indonesia has plans for a gigantic palm oil plantation half the size of the Netherlands.
   In light of these developments, how can we discourage other countries from converting their rainforests into farms to provide fuel for the industrialized nations?
   Do biofuels have the potential to devastate the planet's remaining biodiversity?
   I know he does not have any magical solutions, but the questions will bring some visibility to the issue. My answer to those questions would be to come up with technology that would make it economically uncompetitive to convert their rainforests into fuel. For example, alga farms in desserts, electric cars, solar, wind and even ethanol made form switchgrass (if it can really be grown in a manner that enhances natural ecosystems rather than consume them).
   
   
   
   In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com

   Permalink

2. 

   Tom Philpott Posted 9:29 am
   08 Feb 2006

   sustainable agricultureLB sometimes seems to measure food security purely in terms of grain output, and endorse industrial-style no-till agriculture, which involves lashing of natural-gas-based fertilizers and herbicides. In 2004, the National Corn Growers Assoc. reports, US farmers produced 11.8 bushels of corn and managed to find buyers--for uses ranging from animal feed to ethanol to high-fructose corn syrup--for just 10.8 billion bushels of it. To perform this grand feat of overproduction, they used some 10 billion tons of nitrogen fertilizer. Does this make any sense at all? Remember, the government paid corn farmers $4.5 billion in subsidies that year (see: http://www.ewg.org/farm/progdetail.php?fips=00000&progcode=corn)
   Rather than maximizing grain yields, shouldn't efforts to "feed the world" involve building and promoting local food systems?

   Permalink

3. 

   Tom Philpott Posted 9:33 am
   08 Feb 2006

   correction!That's 10 billion pounds of fertilizer, not tons.

   Permalink

4. 

   greenfish Posted 11:00 pm
   09 Feb 2006

   Don't buy the bookBut you should buy it anyway, just to toss a couple bucks EPI's way.
   No, you should download it, read it on your computer, and make a donation to Earth Policy Institute.  Make sure all the $ goes to EPI (and not middlemen) and save the trees and all that goes along with printing the physical book.

   Permalink

5. 

   David Roberts Posted 1:28 am
   10 Feb 2006

   But then, Greenfish,you'll end up spending all your money on glasses or LASIK surgery, because let me tell you, it ain't easy reading a 266-page book on your computer screen.
   Compromise: Buy it, but then recycle it by making sure all your friends and family read it too.
   
   www.grist.org

   Permalink