Changing the Climate-Change Climate

Bill McKibben sends dispatches from a conference on winning the climate-change fight 1

Where Do We Go, Where Do We Go Now?

Thursday, 27 Jan 2005

MIDDLEBURY, Vt.

Here's the different thing about this conference. Although participants spanned the generations, it was organized in large measure by 20 students here at Middlebury College. Some were already seasoned activists (or as seasoned as one can be at 21); more were new to the issue. But few had spent time in D.C., and none had been deeply imprinted with any one way of doing things. And so, when the gathering turned, as gatherings do, to What Do We Do Next, a fascinating array of projects and voices emerged.

For instance, one group had put together a project designed to flip Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.) in favor of the McCain-Lieberman climate legislation. The group knew where he went to church and who his priest was; they had the list of his campaign contributors, and were strategizing about which ones might be willing to put a little pressure on.

Another set was working with Ben & Jerry's on marketing and packaging their newest flavor, "Fossil Fool," projected to replace (you read it here first) "One Sweet Whirled" as a way to raise awareness about global warming.

A third group was busy fine-tuning its Flat Earth Award website so that it would be ready for the afternoon launch of a new annual prize. If you click through, you can vote for Michael Crichton, Rush Limbaugh, or S. Fred Singer as this year's recipient of the prize for best twisting of the scientific consensus on climate change.

And a fourth group -- just as well-scrubbed, well-organized, and polite -- was busy laying the groundwork for a possible summertime siege of Ford Motor Co. headquarters in Detroit, a large-scale peaceful protest designed to highlight the fact that though it talks the talk, Ford doesn't drive it; its vehicles, in fact, have the lowest average mileage of the Big Three U.S. automakers. (In keeping with the generational dictum that if it doesn't have a website, it doesn't exist, those interested in this trek to Motown can check out EnergyAction.net.)

The point seems to be -- we're at a loss. No one knows for sure what's going to work next. The "Death of Environmentalism" survey data I wrote about yesterday makes it clear that "more of the same" is probably not a very wise strategy. And so there's a casting-about, an attempt to probe what might break us out of the box canyon into which we've wandered. John Passacantando, the gregarious CEO of Greenpeace USA, summed it up in a rousing speech this morning: "We need to take in all the data we can, and all the strategizing and theorizing. And then you need to throw it all out, and just try stuff." (Greenpeace, by the way, has decided to soften its tactics for the moment; this year's biggest project will be a kayak exploration of the North Pole designed to show just how fast the melt there is proceeding.)

From a certain point of view, all that's disheartening -- like, we have no idea where to go. But oddly, the mood around this gathering seems almost giddily hopeful. If you have no idea where to go you just might stumble down the right road. Historical parallels abounded: Billy Parish, the quietly charismatic leader of the nationwide campus movement Energy Action, was quoting Martin Luther King Jr.: "the more I learn about all this, the more frustrated I get, and the more I want to lay my body on the line." But it was also clear that the younger activists were not prisoners of past strategy. Many were quick to point out that their generation was not going to respond to a negative message.

For a long time, much environmentalism has appealed primarily to reason. But at least in the case of global warming, reason has proved insufficient. I can explain to you why an SUV is illogical, but you weren't buying it for logical reasons in the first place; the world is more complicated than that. What everyone gathered for this conference has in common are a nightmare about a world too hot, and a dream about a world cooler in many ways (though perhaps not quite as cold as the 20-below temperatures that greeted early arrivals this morning). How to share those dreams in a way that they'll get into other people's heads and hearts -- that's the task ahead.

Bill McKibben, a scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College, is the author of a dozen books, most recently The Bill McKibben Reader. He serves on Grist’s board of directors and is cofounder of 350.org.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Series Intro
A special series on the alleged "Death of Environmentalism" 0
The death of environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post-environmental world 1
An interview with authors of the controversial essay "The Death of Environmentalism" 0
Where the environmental movement can and should go from here 0
What we talk about when we talk about the future of environmentalism 0
Green leaders say rumors of environmentalism's death are greatly exaggerated 0
Four emerging environmental leaders discuss the future of their field 5
Enviro-justice activists send a dispatch from a panel with The Reapers 0
Dramatizing the "death" of environmentalism doesn't help urban people of color, or anyone else 21
Bill McKibben sends dispatches from a conference on winning the climate-change fight 1
Environmental funders share blame for movement's weak pulse 3
Four environmental funders join the debate over the movement's future 1
Civil-rights, suffrage activists didn't give up, and neither should environmentalists  4
Why race and class matter to the environmental movement 3
The environmental movement won't thrive till it tackles economic development in low-income districts 0
An environmental-justice advocate insists he's not dead yet 7
Advertisement