A Loom With a View

The U.S. organic cotton industry has a tough row to hoe 12

The view from the Panoche Cotton Gin outside Firebaugh, Calif., reveals a great deal about the state of the cotton industry in the U.S. A generation ago, fields of cotton surrounded the gin as far as the eye could see. Today, the gin -- a warehouse-sized plant that can clean and bundle dozens of tons of cotton a day -- is flanked on all sides by almond orchards, groves upon groves of the tall trees.

An endangered species?

Photo: iStockphoto

"Cotton used to be king -- it was our No. 1 crop," Joseph Maron, the operations supervisor for the gin, told a group of visitors on a bright autumn day. "Now it's all pistachios or almonds. The cotton industry is slowly disappearing."

Quickly disappearing may be more like it. This year, California farmers are growing about 550,000 acres of cotton -- a decrease from just two years ago, and a sharp decline from a historic peak of 1.5 million acres. Growers expect the number to drop to less than half a million acres in the next few years. The number of cotton gins has also plummeted. There used to be more than 100 gins in the San Joaquin Valley; now there are half that many.

Why are cotton planters facing a state of collapse? For the same reason that soy farmers, tomato growers, and apple orchards are struggling: international competition. It's simply cheaper to grow cotton in Pakistan, India, or Turkey than it is in California, Arizona, or Texas.

The globalization of agriculture is certainly bad news for growers who have never known anything except cotton. It's also troubling for the advocates who are spearheading a campaign for organic and low-spray cotton. As they promote a way of clothing ourselves that doesn't involve stripping the earth naked, backers of sustainable agriculture are finding that the economic imperatives of a global economy are making their work harder than they ever expected.

"The market for domestic organic cotton has completely disappeared, because the price of overseas cotton is half as much," says Marcia Gibbs, program director of the Sustainable Cotton Project. "If you were a farmer, you'd be a fool to grow organic cotton if you weren't sure you'd get a living wage for your work. We're seeing a big increase in people interested in organic cotton, but we're not seeing people step up to the plate with their pocketbooks."

How does your cotton grow?

Photo: iStockphoto

It's In the Jeans

Cotton is one of the most chemical-dependent crops, with conventional growers using a battery of herbicides and pesticides to control weeds and insects. Most cotton fields -- at least 70 percent in the U.S. -- are also genetically modified, as farmers come to depend more and more on Roundup Ready seed. The reliance on chemical inputs has been blamed for a range of problems, from water contamination to unusually high cancer rates.

In an effort to reduce the environmental impacts of cotton production, the Sustainable Cotton Project tries to enlist farmers in a program to convert to organic. But it has been a tough row to hoe. Nationwide, there are no more than 12 organic-certified cotton growers, according to the Organic Trade Association. In California, there are just two -- and that's double from a year ago.

The effort is greatly complicated by the fact that cotton -- a gangly, four-foot shrub whose flower forms the downy fiber manufacturers prize -- needs to drop its leaves before it can be mechanically harvested. Otherwise, the green leaves can stain the cotton, and make it wet and susceptible to mildew. The most common way to pick cotton, then, is to first spray a chemical defoliant on it -- hardly an organic solution. Organic cotton growers in Turkey and Pakistan often pay people to handpick the bolls, and don't use defoliants, but that's not a viable option in the U.S.

"We can't compete with a grower that has low labor costs," says Frank Williams, a co-owner of Windfall Farms I in Firebaugh. This year, Williams and his brother-in-law grew 40 acres of organic cotton on their 1,300 acres, and they plan to quadruple that next season. But it's a gamble for their business. "It's economics," Williams says. "All of our acres of cotton, I don't know that we make hardly anything on it. There are other competing crops that make a lot more money. The only thing that saves us is the government subsidies."

Since most cotton growers can't take the risk of experimenting with how to harvest cotton absent chemical defoliants, advocates have set their sights on simply lowering, rather than eliminating, the amount of chemicals used in cultivation. A program run by the Sustainable Cotton Project called BASIC -- biological agricultural systems in cotton -- encourages farmers to quit GM seeds and adopt more sustainable practices such as composting, cover cropping, and organic pest management. In 2006, some 1,200 acres of cotton are being grown under BASIC guidelines.

Though still in an initial stage, the BASIC program is already turning heads. Sustainable-agriculture advocates have been impressed by pesticide reductions as high as 73 percent. And farmers like BASIC cotton because they have found they can maintain their yields while cutting the amount of money they spend on chemical inputs.

Stanley Silveira is one farmer who has been busy telling his neighbors about the benefits of BASIC cotton. A longtime farmer and professed evangelical Christian, Silveira cheerfully compares his adoption of low-spray techniques to his religious conversion.

"God created everything," Silveira, a round fellow with a crown of silver hair, says. "There is a wisdom in the natural world, and hopefully we can be wise stewards of the way God planned it. We don't want to upset the balance. If we can get the same yields, and the same quality with less inputs, and it's better for the environment -- that just makes sense."

But even if farmers can perfect ecologically sustainable methods for growing their cotton, they still face the challenge of developing economically sustainable ways for growing their sales. The biggest hurdles for maintaining a healthy cotton industry are business-oriented, not biological.

Boll Evils

To stick with organic and low-spray cotton, farmers say they need a commitment from apparel companies to make steady, yearly purchases of sustainable harvests. But the apparel industry is loath to make concrete promises to buy domestic cotton when organic cotton from, say, India sells for less.

The reluctance of companies to commit to U.S. organic cotton was on display during a recent tour of California fields sponsored by the Sustainable Cotton Project. With two buses packed full of fashion industry executives from popular brands such as Levi Strauss and Prana, the tour was intended as a way to show off the potential of sustainable cotton. But while all the apparel executives seemed genuinely interested in using more organic cotton in their clothes, none was prepared to make a public promise to buy more American-grown fiber. The economics simply don't add up.

"We're concerned about the impacts of chemicals, and the health of everyone along the supply chain," says Erica Bloomenthal, an executive with upscale clothier Eileen Fisher, which sells a line of organic cotton T-shirts. "But we're in a global economy, and we can't ignore that. The apparel business is a global business. We're a design-driven company. We have to like what we see, and if we find a beautiful piece of Italian fabric, that's what we'll use."

Offshore, you betcha.

Photo: state.gov

The challenge of supporting U.S. farmers is compounded by the fact that the domestic apparel industry has been, for all intents and purposes, dismantled. Most U.S. sewing operations were outsourced to Asia and Latin America long ago. And in the past decade, textile mills -- which used to form the economic backbone of many southern states -- have been offshored as well. Which means if a fashion company wants to buy American-grown organic cotton, it would likely have to send the fiber across the Pacific to be milled, woven into fabric, and sewn, and then ship it back across the ocean for sale in stores -- not exactly the most sustainable scheme, given the petroleum involved alone.

Essentially, then, the way to get relief to cotton farmers would be to rebuild the U.S. clothing industry by reassembling a domestic supply chain of growers, mills, and sewing shops.

"A reliable supply chain is the biggest challenge in sourcing," says Roian Atwood, director of community relations and organic programs at the trendy clothing-maker American Apparel. His company sells a line of organic T-shirts -- made with cotton sourced from Turkey. "I think what we need is someone who wants to creatively invest in U.S. manufacturing. This is about the longevity of our economy, about realizing that manufacturing has to be part of the equation, that it can't all be a service economy."

So maybe supporting domestic, sustainable cotton production is less an issue of economics than a test of values. Do U.S. consumers value domestically grown, processed, and manufactured clothing? Is it important that the fiber keeping us warm is made closer to home? Or are we content with having all the clothes we wear be grown and sewn overseas?

"When I started my own company, I wanted to do it the most sustainable way that I could," said Tierra Del Forte, founder of a boutique jeans brand called Del Forte Denim, as she stood next to a field of cotton ready to be harvested. "People are now getting much more interested in where their food comes from. That's what I want to do with my business, to get people to think that their clothes come from somewhere, and that there are people involved every step of the way."

Jason Mark co-manages San Francisco’s Alemany Farm. He is the coauthor, with Kevin Danaher, of Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. matter Posted 3:43 am
    20 Nov 2006

    Hemp -- not cottonRather than flog a plant known for its needs for pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, why not swith BACK to industrial hemp? Hemp requires little in the way of pesticides, herbicides or fertilzers, and produces a range of fibers and fabrics known for their durability and people-pleasing propensities -- including softness, luster, and the ability to improve rather than degrade with age. Pre anti-marijuana induced anti-drug frenzy, industrial hemp was used in this country for a plethora of applications, including sinewy rope, canvas sails, table linens and luxurious clothing. Isn't it crazy that we refuse to allow anyone in this country to grow this miracle fiber -- which has as close a relationship to marijuana as a Chihuahua does to a Rottweiler?
  2. Truly Scrumptious Posted 6:19 am
    21 Nov 2006

    cotton's time has come and goneWhile I will always celebrate organic over conventional, even organic cotton is just not good.  Chemicals are just one problem with cotton.  You need lakes and lakes of water.
    Those California cotton farmers should be telling their governor to pass the Industrial Hemp allowance that he rejected this year, so they can grow something that takes far fewer resources to grow - whether conventionally or organic.

  3. willa Posted 12:02 pm
    21 Nov 2006

    style?There's exactly one reason I don't own more organic cotton clothing than I do:  I can't ever find anything I'd be caught dead in that comes in my size!  My sheets and towels are all either old or organic, but when it comes to clothes...well, a few pairs of socks and underwear, a bra, a pair of "yoga" pants (read:  very expensive bootcut sweatpants).
    Organic cotton clothing is all made either for size-0 Pilates-practicing rich women or else for dirty-hippie types.  While I share a number of views with the latter group, neither group is one I'm likely to wear the clothing of in this lifetime.  I'm hardly fashionable, but I want clothes that feel good and look decent, and that are useful for the things I do in life.  Handmade shawls are well and good, but what am I to do when I am working outside and need jeans and t-shirts?  Until I can replace my rapidly-worn-out jeans with organic ones that work as well, I will keep shopping at the mall, because I can't go around in clothes that no longer cover the parts that legally (or practically) need covering!
  4. caniscandida Posted 2:58 pm
    21 Nov 2006

    "in this lifetime"What kind of karma would you need to have, Willa, to come back as a size-0 Pilates-izing rich chick?  Is that good or, maybe, not so good?
  5. willa Posted 12:24 am
    22 Nov 2006

    ...and any other lifetimes!Wow, I hope the powers that be wouldn't be that cruel to me--I do try to be good! :)
  6. kmp Posted 12:50 am
    22 Nov 2006

    Wellthere is always Patagonia. (and I swear I do not work for them!).
    Without them, my supply of reasonably stylish, can-wear-to-work organic clothing would be reduced to next-to-nil.
    Skinny Rich Chicks, albeity a particularly annoying sub-demographic in American society, would make a good name for an all-female punk band.
  7. willa Posted 1:06 am
    22 Nov 2006

    sizeI know we've been over this before, but Kaela, fercryinoutloud, Patagonia considers a size 14 "extra large" (I'm assuming, since the pants they sell in dress sizes come up to 14, and the pants they sell in S-M-L-XL presumably cover the same size range).  Yes, I know Americans are fat and out of shape, but yesterday I loaded and unloaded over a ton of hay, among other things, and let me tell you that unless I am cursed and come back as a Skinny Rich Chick, I will never wear a pair of Patagonia pants.  
    I may be in the minority of Lane Bryant shoppers, wearing the clothes I buy there to do hard work in, but I'm certainly not the only one.  Once I overcame the horror that someone might see me there ("Oh, no, now everyone will know that I'm fat!!!  Because otherwise, how would they have figured it out?"), I found it extremely refreshing to shop in a place where, fairly frequently, I can't find anything small enough to fit me, rather than trying to squeeze into the lousy size 14s.
    It's time for American clothing companies to wake up and smell the wide range of sizes and shapes people come in, and I absolutely think manufacturers of sustainable clothing are included in that.
  8. kmp Posted 3:08 am
    22 Nov 2006

    Prana is for "climbers"Willa,
    Sorry if I offended - certainly wasn't my intention. I do tend to forget, in my rosy love glow for all things Patagonia, that they are basically made for a lanky, thin body type. Hence my boyfriend, who actually loves Patagonia clothes, can wear almost none of them because he is shaped roughly like a fireplug (albeit an extremely cute fireplug).  He, on the other hand, can wear EMS clothing, which is always too small for me - binding in weird spots, arms too short, legs too short, etc.
    I laughed at your message, not because I'm not sympathetic to the plight, but because one of my girlfriends makes a similar plea, often, in trying to find active clothing that fits her frame.  Once, when she was complaining to a fellow climber at the crags about a pair of Prana pants that she loved, but simply could not fit into the XL, the (short, skinny, blond, female) climber responded: "Well, Prana is made for climbers, you know."  As if there are no climbers larger than a size 14, (or none hauling hay bales for that matter).  As if struggling up a rock face weren't hard enough work, you have to feel fat doing it because you can't fit into any of the "climbing" clothes.
    Believe me, nothing would make me happier than to have women's clothes, especially sustainably produced clothes, in 37 different shapes & sizes.  Then my girlfriend would have one less excuse not to come to the crags with me. :)
  9. willa Posted 7:30 am
    22 Nov 2006

    Excuses not to be Sisyphus :)Personally, I've tried rockclimbing once (when I was about twelve), and I suck at it.  Besides, there's usually either a totally walkable path to the same place or else no reason you need to be there in the first place, so the practical side of me rebels at the idea of scaling a rock just to get to the top.  I also don't waste energy growing flowers when I could be growing something I could eat instead. :)
    I discovered one company that makes some nifty activewear for the non-skinny, although they fail on the actual topic of this thread, sustainability, in that they're just an ordinary clothing company that happens to sell plus-size stuff.  I got an awesome pair of ski pants from them, which means I no longer have to wear miles-too-long, too-loose-in-the-waist-and-too-tight-in-the-rear mens pants.  Now, if only I could get them to make jeans and trousers with non-elasticized waists, I'd be all set for both elastic-waisted activewear and non-elastic-waisted normal clothes...
  10. kinz1j Posted 3:02 am
    30 Nov 2006

    US producer of organic cotton and clothesThere is at least one American company that both grows organic cotton and manufactures clothes from it locally.  SOS From Texas offers t-shirts and other simple clothes made from organic cotton grown on their farm in Texas.  Their clothing selection isn't going to impress the ultra-fashion-conscious skinny rich chicks and they don't have jeans, but there are lots of t-shirts and some socks.  It's a start, and if they can get a viable business going, maybe others will take notice and follow their example.
  11. willa Posted 10:13 am
    05 Jan 2007

    SOS from TexasI know this thread is so old it's unlikely that many people will read this comment, but fyi:  I ordered some t-shirts and a pair of socks from SOS from Texas, following kinz1j's link above, and I love them!  I thought I'd check out the site, and I saw a shirt I absolutely had to get for a friend--the one that says "toadal chaos" for a friend of mine whose name is Chaos (a long story)--so I thought I'd give their stuff a try for myself, too.  I now have a new favorite long-sleeve t (the women's scoopneck), and a new favorite short-sleeve version of the same as well.  So soft and comfy!  So actually cut to fit me!  Well, I had to roll up the long sleeves a slight bit, but other than that...I always have a problem with t-shirts having too-large armholes and yet somehow still having too-small sleeves, and these have neither--the armhole fits perfectly, and the sleeve is still appropriately loose.
    And hey, Kaela, if you read this--it's possible their long sleeves might actually be long enough got you.
    Oh yeah, and their stuff won't break the bank.
    I like these shirts enough I can almost forgive them for being from Texas (it's a New Mexico thing, not associating with Texans, kinda like Oregonians and Californians). :)
  12. Peaceful Disorder Posted 5:46 am
    13 Sep 2008

    Why should I use organic cottonAt first my reason for searching out organic cotton was medical.  
    At only a few weeks old my son developed severe eczema and his pediatrician suggested organic cotton as an alternative to the harsh steroidal creams they wanted to put him on.  
    The search for organic clothing was not easy, and just plain expensive, but I knew his baby skin could not take the harsh chemicals used in regular textiles.  
    The more research I did, the more I knew our entire family needed to make a change, for us and the planet.  
    That was when I founded Peaceful Disorder, and since it is a family adventure, the prices are very reasonable. ($12-$30)  
    You will probably see the same products in your local boutique for twice as much, I know I did.  
    But best of all, after about 6 months of wearing organic, our baby has no sign of eczema.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement