Forget Clinton, McCain, Obama, Edwards, and the rest of 'em. I think I've found my candidate.
He's an avid biker, a Whole Foods shopper, and a willing participant in absurd "save the Arctic" protest activities. Plus, he looks damn fine in his organic Loomstate jeans. What else could you want in a President?
Comments
View as Flat
mihan Posted 3:57 am
04 Oct 2007
I also got a call from Bill Clinton, telling me the same.
And look how that turned out. Sigh.
Permalink
stpeterican Posted 7:07 am
04 Oct 2007
Permalink
ClickClickClank Posted 1:39 pm
04 Oct 2007
People do not want to live in a world devoid of entertainment.
Where there is a demand for entertainment, there will be entertainers. Some will be well known.
These celebrities can choose to ride a bike, or drive a hummer. I know what I'd sooner they do, and I know the example I'd sooner they set for others.
By saying 'it's all or nothing', you are essentially saying that anybody in a position to publicly support the environment should either a) become an environmentalist, or b) cease to exist. The truth is, if the only people in the public eye who gave a crap about the environment were environmentalists and scientists, it'd be much easier for us to relabel that group 'boring wackos' and simply ignore them.
It's the community mentality we have. People tend to treat their favourite celebrities as if they are members of their local community. You feel you know them. It's like if Bob - the nice old guy down the street - told you that he was going to install solar hot water. You might have thought solar hot water was a waste of time, but because you know Bob, and you know he's not a one-agenda nutjob, your first thought would probably be 'maybe there's something in this solar stuff after all'.
Celebrity is a powerful tool, and if it's going to used (and it will), I'd sooner it was used to push the important issues.
Permalink