From LoveSalem:
So we were talking about keeping chickens as part of a scheme for implementing the "Food Not Lawns" ideal (Victory Gardening for The New Reality). Someone thought you could keep hens but not roosters. Someone else thought you couldn't keep either. It all led to an inquiry to the powers that be, who replied ...
Read the rest if you dare.
Comments
View as Flat
caniscandida Posted 6:35 am
24 Sep 2008
But what is the objection to keeping chickens "for any purpose"? Because they (allegedly) make a lot of noise? Do they, in reality? In a spacious Western city, is the crowing of a rooster really a huge problem?
Some dogs bark a lot, and many parrots squawk abominably. (In fact, the keeping of parrots SHOULD be illegal, but not on account of the noise they make.) And yet there is no ban on them, to my knowledge.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Sean Casten Posted 7:37 am
24 Sep 2008
Permalink
thoman5 Posted 9:20 am
24 Sep 2008
Permalink
human power Posted 12:14 pm
24 Sep 2008
On the topic of urban gardening, ducks make much more sense than chickens (assuming codes can be changed out of the dark ages). Chickens dig up everything in sight so one needs to either cage the plants or cage the birds, which is cruel. Ducks, on the other hand, don't dig and they much prefer slugs and snails to most other foods. Ducks will walk down rows of produce and just suck the pests right off the stalks. Also, except when mating, ducks are extraordinarily quiet birds so you will get fewer complaints from neighbors. If you can acclimate yourself to the stronger flavored eggs, most ducks are also more prolific layers than all but the heaviest-laying buffs.
Permalink