Like peanut butter and chocolate 12

Comments View as Threaded

1. 

   David Roberts Posted 10:32 am
   25 Sep 2006

   Huffington PostIf you regular readers are wondering why my tone is slightly more formal (stiff?) than usual in this post, it's because I'm cross-posting to The Huffington Post, where readers are not as familiar with my many charms or as forgiving of my many rhetorical peccadilloes.
   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-roberts/inhofes-speec...
   
   www.grist.org

   Permalink

2. 

   Bart Anderson Posted 11:07 am
   25 Sep 2006

   Break down the wallsIt's good to hear you've made it into the Huffington Post.  We need to break out of the envrionmental ghetto!
   
   

   Permalink

3. 

   BrianS Posted 1:32 pm
   25 Sep 2006

   Inhofe's belief has its limitsInhofe apparently isn't confident enough in denying global warming that he'll bet me over it, even when the bet winnings go to charity.  I contacted his office in August, and never heard back.  More info here:
   http://backseatdriving.blogspot.com/2006/08/dear-senator-...

   Permalink

4. 

   Kit Stolz Posted 3:54 pm
   25 Sep 2006

   Inhofe admits he's losingIn an interview with the newspaper Tulsa World on July 22 of this year (no longer available on-line) Inhofe conceded that "the other side" is winning the debate. "The other side" includes the likes of Scientific American, who declared this month that "the debate on global warming is over" (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000EABE4-BDFF-...).
   
   Let's see: the Senator from Big Oil, or Scientific American? Who is more trustworthy? Let me think...

   Permalink

5. 

   mihan Posted 3:47 am
   26 Sep 2006

   Dave,"Because scientists, unlike senators, cannot find all the information they need in their own rear ends..."
   You've never read my thesis, have you?

   Permalink

6. 

   DeSmog Sarah Posted 11:02 am
   28 Sep 2006

   Great pieceThanks for that, Dave! We've got some too over at DeSmogBlog... great to see your beefier coverage.

   Permalink

7. 

   BillBeahan Posted 11:04 am
   21 May 2007

   Sorry Imhohe is rightGlobal warming is a myth

   Permalink

8. 

   climatechangemyth Posted 6:06 am
   09 Jul 2007

   climate change is a mythThere is no proof any detrimental climate changes are iminent.  Liberal wackos just love to be inflamatory and wind up the hoards of long-haired, hemp-weaving hippies whose only ambition is to protest whatever cause is popular at the moment.

   Permalink

9. 

   GreyFlcn Posted 6:21 am
   09 Jul 2007

   I take itI take it Newt Gingrich is a liberal wacko, huh?
   
   http://greyfalcon.net/newt

   Permalink

10. 

    GreyFlcn Posted 6:21 am
    09 Jul 2007

    Wupshttp://greyfalcon.net/gingrich

    Permalink

11. 

    Dan Detroit Posted 9:48 am
    24 Feb 2008

    Wacknuts!It is a shame that the minimal scientific evidence that global temperatures may have risen in recent years is taken as proof that humans have caused it leads to such strident comments. Anyone who disagrees is lying for some demonic reason. I guess that is part and parcel of the leftist shtick. Demonize anyone who disagrees.
    Amazing- The presumption of the ignorant!
    You do know that the sensationalist points made by Mr. Gore were found sufficiently lacking by a British court such that his film can not be shown with out notation to that effect.

    Permalink

12. 

    Dan Detroit Posted 10:14 am
    24 Feb 2008

    Gingrich says - "We just don't know!"WOW!  I apprehensively expected support at the link. However, Gingrich says: "We don't know even if the globe is warming, let alone if humans are causing it." to paraphrase. "Remember global cooling was the fear just a few decades ago."
    Why must environmentalists demonize anyone who expresses a different view?  

    Permalink