Suppose you're a commodity trader. Someone offers you a future contract to buy gasoline at $2.99/gallon for the next three years. If you think that you can sell that gasoline for more than that, you might think this is a license to print money, and would therefore pay for that privilege. Which raises the following questions:
- How much would you pay for that future "strip"?
- Is the answer to Question 1 more or less than a Chrysler?
Comments
View as Flat
green8659 Posted 12:33 pm
07 May 2008
I still don't think that warrants buying a Chrysler. Especially when I could possibly just waste the rebate in the lose of fuel efficiency.
Green and Environmental Website | Green Blog
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 2:35 pm
07 May 2008
Only car worse than a ford? Yep.
Even too-stupid-to-live bush voters buy Toyota trucks and SUVs now. No bailout this time! Crapler, ford, GM...let them die off. Toyota and Honda are building plants here now, and importing workers who know how to read.
Too late to save the original US auto industry. Factories operated by robots and immigrants from countries with real education are the future. Will Canadians cross the border to work here?
We can only hope. Hehey.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
hcsteiner Posted 4:22 am
08 May 2008
In response to the questions: I am a poor, indebted college student with about $3000 to my name (and 3 times that in outstanding loans). I would instantly hand over all of my cash for the opportunity to purchase gas for $2.99 for the next three years, and will even throw in my 1992 Oldsmobile for good measure (worth approximately 87 cents). I would sell the gas for slightly over my purchase price to low-income families, as they are the ones who are the most affected by gas price increases. In very little time, I will have earned back my investment and created a positive social return, as well.
Permalink