I need a new vehicle

Tell BioD what car to buy 27

My beater has passed 170,000 miles. I couldn't get the key to turn the other day, and the steering column wouldn't lock.

Rather than spend a day ripping my car apart, I had it towed to a dealership where I was told it would cost $900 to repair. A spring had broken and the column lock pin had fallen into the key mechanism. I told the mechanic to throw the pin and spring away because I don't care if the column locks, I just don't want it to lock while I'm driving down the freeway. I'm going to hotwire the switch, which means I also won't need an ignition key. So, for now I can continue to drive it, but only until I find a replacement.

We are a two-car family. My wife drives a Prius and I am driving an '89 Cherokee. I haul heavy stuff in it fairly often and use it to visit my forest property on logging roads once in a blue moon. Otherwise, it sits idle most of the time, thanks to my hybrid electric bike and working out of my home.

I'm thinking Yaris hatchback with a trailer hitch and a roof rack. I should still be able to haul stuff around the city now and then using my fold up trailer, and put other things in a cargo carrier for longer trips. I can rent a truck when I need to haul big stuff.

I'll tell you what else I like about a Yaris. It has electric steering. I have a pipe dream of modifying one with A123 batteries and an electric motor to drive the back wheels. Most cars need the engine running to drive pumps, which drive their power steering and brakes. With electric steering, I can turn the motor off and run the power steering on batteries. My wife and kids want me to get something bigger because we have always relied on the Jeep to haul the big stuff around. I don't know. I think we could live without it -- but a Yaris might be a mistake. What should I do?

My real name is Russ Finley. I live in Seattle, married with children. Suffice it to say that although I am trained and educated as an engineer, my passion is nature. I very much want my grandchildren to live on a planet where lions, tigers, and bears have not joined the long and growing list of creatures that used to be. In an attempt to minimize the workload on Grist editors responsible for turning my submissions into intelligible articles, I will also be posting on a seperate blog called Biodiversivist, which will contain articles in addition to those submitted to Grist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. KenG Posted 8:43 am
    25 Oct 2007

    Towing?A quick google indicates towing is not recommended with the Yaris. I'm not 100% sure on that since the European Yaris is rated to tow small loads, but I would be very careful about towing with a car not rated for it.
    If you want to spend some money, the Ford Escape Hybrid will get the same gas mileage, tow 1000 lbs (conservatively rated due to the transmission, not the frame or suspension) and is a lot more car than the Yaris. Definitely an easier transition from the Cherokee. - Bad news - waiting list.
  2. spaceshaper's avatar

    spaceshaper Posted 10:35 am
    25 Oct 2007

    More of a people-mover than a haulage vehicle.The Yaris is actually pretty roomy and comfortable for five adults but don't expect it to hold their bags too. The 3-door is not great for kids in carseats, natch, but is very flexible with the split rear seat. Great little runabout, half the cost of a Prius, not rated for towing in the US I think. Maybe a very light trailer.

    The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.
  3. Sam Wells Posted 10:49 am
    25 Oct 2007

    Rebuild it dude!Gee, Bio-D, you actually use a vehicle for hauling stuff and going off-road like on logging trails?  Man, you probably already exactly what you're looking for!  Fixing it could be several grand but buying new costs what - maybe 20 to 30 grand over 5 years?
    And think about it, your old Cherokee will end up somewhere, like in a used car lot, a junkyard, or in Mexico.  Now you have TWO vehicles to deal with, twice the global warming and pollution stuff.
    I know, when you get a little older and busier you don't have time to rebuild cars and swap out short-blocks, suspensions, and whatnot.  I haven't rebuild a car in years, although the older Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi, and Datsun (my favorite) went forever, maybe a half million miles on each.  
    But environmentally speaking, when you buy a new vehicle you've inherited as the pollution that went into making it.  /sam

    Onward through the fog
  4. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 12:48 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    Good advice allThey make a trailer hitch for the 2007 Yaris, so, as long as I'm careful I should be able to haul a small trailer, but not at highway speeds.
    I can't buy a Ford Escape hybrid because I've been poking fun at them for years as a kind of oxymoron. Maybe I shouldn't have done that....
    It also has 2 wheel drive, so is it an SUV or is it a station wagon with big wheels posing as one?
    The thought of rebuilding the Jeep has crossed my mind many times. The energy used to manufacture and maintain a car is not trivial, although I don't know if anyone knows what that is with any certainty. The dust to dust study I'm familiar with is a piece of crap. Two things are for sure. It only gets 15 MPG, at best, and I'm sure the tail pipe emissions blow. But mostly, I know that rebuiding your old car is not a model for others to emulate. It won't happen because there is too much variability in car models, parts become difficult to find, they are unreliable, and worst of all they tend to have low status.
    Maybe I should wait for the return of the TDIs with their new air pollution technology. Those cars have really high mileage.
    Nobody makes the car I want--a plug in. We have to start driving much lighter machines with hybrid electric drives. I would like to set an example if that is possible, like  with the hybrid electric bike. Picture a Yaris with 12 Dewalt battery packs in the spare tire area driving electric motors on the rear wheels with a ten mile range for around town errands.
    More advice please.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  5. David Roberts's avatar

    David Roberts Posted 1:25 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    BioD,Do the same thing you did with your bike -- convert it to electric. Might be a bit more work ...

    grist.org
  6. KenG Posted 2:29 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    Other IdeasWell, as an Escape hybrid owner, I can only say don't knock it until you've driven one. But since you probably don't want to spend that much, some other ideas.
    If you really want towing capability I'd look for something a little bigger than a Yaris. Used is a good idea if you don't put a lot of miles on. Think about minivans. More room, better mpg than the Jeep. If you don't need to haul the family along, think about a 4 cylinder Ford Ranger pickup. Surprisingly good gas mileage and real hauling capacity.
  7. Nucbuddy Posted 8:27 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    Used vs. newKenG wrote: Used is a good idea if you don't put a lot of miles on.
    Ditto, as long as you can find a tow hitch for an older Yaris. The only economic reason to prefer new over used is if you are planning on putting on substantially-more mileage than the new-vehicle fleet average of 15,000 miles per year. (My personal cutoff would be something like 20,000+ miles per year.) Used cars can be purchased online on eBay, Auto-Trader, etc.
    By the way, you can put a hitch on a Chevy Aveo, and it is a far better value than a Toyota Yaris (especially considering the fact that Toyota's quality ratings have been dropping like rocks).

  8. amazingdrx's avatar

    amazingdrx Posted 11:11 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    Used steering columnFrom the junkyard.  The labor to fix the intricate mess in the steering column is why it cost 900 bucks to fix.
    Faced with a similar problem on a GM vehicle, I bought a 100 dollar replacement steering column.  It installed in a couple of hours, of my inexpensive repair time.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
  9. justlou Posted 11:27 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    "Surprisingly Good Gas Mileage"Would you please comment on what you consider to be good mileage?  
    Top mileage I have seen for a pickup in the US is about 26 mpg.  Sorry, but I don't consider this good.  
    I might be waiting a long time, but I don't consider anything under 40 mpg as being good.  
    We really need to be pushing higher standards.  Which means getting rid of a lot of weight we are moving around needlessly.  What ever happened to the idea of simplicity?  There is a tremendous amount of crappola built into modern vehicles, much in the name of luxury.  Who needs all this crap?  
  10. KenG Posted 11:44 pm
    25 Oct 2007

    MileageThe Ranger is rated at 21/26 under the new EPA ratings. That is very close to a lot of small cars such as the VW Beetle or the Honda Civic 2.0 liter. Wanting to get 40 mpg in a vehicle that has ground clearance and will haul a ton of cargo will have you waiting for a long time (or driving a diesel).
    A quick look at the EPA website shows no non-hybrids that get 40 mpg highway and only about 7 small cars that get at least 35 mpg. The proposed 35 mpg (combined) CAFE requirement will rule out every non-hybrid non-diesel car now on the market.
  11. mihan's avatar

    mihan Posted 12:05 am
    26 Oct 2007

    Have you tried Reiki?A friend kept her car going for at least a year past its useful life by performing Reiki on it to get it started.
    Could work, you never know until you try.
    It sounds like you just need a small but capable car. Since you don't drive it that often, it doesn't make sense to get a hybrid; a new-to-you car will have a lesser environmental impact than a new hybrid.
    Don't get something bigger (forget the Escape!)---as soon as you do, you will rearrange your life so that you "need" a bigger (less efficient) car. It's one of the reasons I haven't gotten a car yet.
  12. justlou Posted 12:34 am
    26 Oct 2007

    ReplyThe Ranger is rated at 21/26 under the new EPA ratings. That is very close to a lot of small cars such as the VW Beetle or the Honda Civic 2.0 liter. Wanting to get 40 mpg in a vehicle that has ground clearance and will haul a ton of cargo will have you waiting for a long time (or driving a diesel).
    That the Honda Civic or the Beetle are getting this lousy of mileage reinforces my point about vehicle weight.  The potential gains of small are often lost with all the unnecessary weight.  
    You will not be hauling literally a ton of cargo in your 4 cylinder Ranger.  
    What about the option of renting a bigger vehicle when you really need to haul a ton of cargo and driving a very fuel efficient vehicle when you don't?  The dollars saved while driving the very fuel efficient vehicle would more than pay to rent only when that option was needed.  
  13. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 12:39 am
    26 Oct 2007

    Didn't mean to knock your Escape, KenMakes my car look like a junkyard on wheels.
    Nucbuddy,
    Your comment prompted me to poke around until I found this review of the Aveo. The charts are really useful. It also looks like the Aveo is designed and built in Korea.
    There does not seem to be a whole lot of difference between these economy cars. I was driving a '92 Tercel with automatic transmission while the Jeep was in the shop and I seriously doubt that any of these cars are an improvement over it. They just keep changing the look to compete for customers.
    Car technology has peaked just as recip engined airplanes did in the '40s. The jet engine revolutionized air travel. We need to replace the recip on cars as well (a jet engine would be cool, but not very practical). On the other hand, we may one day see micro turbine engines powering serial hybrids. A turbine engine is also less fussy about the fuel you feed it.
    I have never owned a new car. All of my cars have been American made. My wife has never owned a used car and all of them have been made in Japan. I go for inexpensive maintenance hogs, she goes for reliability.
    Hoping to punch out of the box this time. Still undecided. I definitly do not want to put an electric drive on a big heavy car. That would take a big motor and a shitload of batteries. The days of the SUV are numbered. They are not good candidates for high mileage and 90% of them are never used for sport or utility.
    What somebody needs to do, and I may or may not be the one, is put this car I envision together with off the shelf components. Picture a small economy car with an electric drive blowing tire smoke all over a drift car track. It would run out of juice in about five minutes but the image would be made by then. Turn the recip engine back on and drive home.




    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  14. Matt G Posted 2:34 am
    26 Oct 2007

    Let's seperate your issuesI say fix it, get rid of it and rent, or buy a used SUV.  I'm embarrassed that I own an SUV, but I don't feel guilty about it.  I bought a '97 Explorer as a second vehicle for the rare instance when my wife and I each need a car, and as something to get me to the snow.  I put well under 1000 miles on it a year.  That's $150/year in gas - certainly not enough to justify any kind of payback for a hybrid.
    If you want an electric car for running around town when it's raining, consider something like the Zap Xebra.  It's $10k, and will run at 40mph for 25 miles, and carries 300lbs worth of up to 4 people (heh - small people, obviously).  I believe they're still on lead-acid battery technology, but it would be a great platform to experiment with better battery systems.
  15. KenG Posted 3:25 am
    26 Oct 2007

    Multiple VehiclesThe logical approach is to have the truck/SUV for hauling and an econobox for other driving. I'd like to do that. I need the truck for heavy hauling a few times a month but my wife seldom lets me drive the hybrid. So the truck gets 6000 to 8000 miles a year. A third car won't work because the license and insurance costs so much.
    Justiou - I don't think you understand us truck guys. Hauling a ton in a Ranger is not a problem. I regularly haul over a ton in my 6 cyl Dakota. Infamous episodes in my past include 1800 lbs of gravel in a Datsun with a curb weight of 2200 lbs and 3700 lbs of scrap iron in a stock F-100. When you need a truck, you really need a truck.
  16. Matt G Posted 5:05 am
    26 Oct 2007

    KenG8000 miles a year = $1,600/year in gas, or about $800 a year in savings if you doubled the economy.  It seems insurance would be less than this.  Maybe instead of a 3rd car, you could try something like FlexCar and leave the truck at home?  Assuming you're close to a FlexCar, you can get the environmental and perhaps cost benefits of an economy car without having extra insurance, maint., and purchase costs.
  17. KenG Posted 6:53 am
    26 Oct 2007

    Not ExactlyMy truck gets 20 mpg so the gas cost is currently about $1100/yr. There is nothing on the market (save hybrids) that could double the mileage. Insurance and license is about $900/yr. Even with another car, I would still need to drive the truck several thousand miles a year.
    My feeling is we won't see great increases in mileage until we get the car weight down and that will require a market for expensive small cars or a reduction in safety standards. And there will still be a significant need for larger vehicles. Since I traded the minivan in on the Escape hybrid we've had several instances where we had to take two cars instead of one (5 passenger instead of 7 passenger). I think one of the great truisms is that things never work out as well as they looked on paper.
  18. justlou Posted 9:55 pm
    26 Oct 2007

    Understand?"Justiou - I don't think you understand us truck guys."  No, I guess not since I don't identify with my trucks, but I do know broken down trucks.  
    I own a Chevy Silverado and a Ford F-250 that I use for work.  I wouldn't put a ton in either one of them.  But I do have a gooseneck trailer for the F-250 that I can haul some real loads on.  
    But when I am not working I prefer to drive the Toyota Camry which gets double and triple the mileage of the two work beasts.  
    My first Camry purchased in 1990 got 34 mpg on the highway.  In 17 years, other than the high mileage hybrids (there are some hybrids getting lousy mileage), the auto companies really have not improved much.  My expectations of getting 40 mpg for any future vehicles are not unrealistic.  

  19. amazingdrx's avatar

    amazingdrx Posted 12:42 am
    27 Oct 2007

    HypercarThe latest Lovins Hypercar is almost ready for manufacturing.  100 mpg plugin hybrid.
    The carbon fiber body is even ready for mass production.  Check it out on the Eco-Tech program on the Science Channel.
    All that is lacking now is an auto company to mass produce and market it.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
  20. amazingdrx's avatar

    amazingdrx Posted 12:46 am
    27 Oct 2007

    Videohttp://www.autobloggreen.com/tag/EcoTech/
    Great stuff!

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
  21. tnrkitect Posted 3:20 am
    27 Oct 2007

    I too am in a similar dillemaI have a 1995 Ford Ranger with the 4 cyl and 5 speed that has over 219,000 miles and is still going strong, although some components are starting to show the need for major repairs. Even with the high mileage, I still get an average of 22 MPG for daily driving, and just this last weekend averaged 25 1/2 mpg on a trip back from visiting relatives in Alabama.
    I use my truck as a daily driver, as well as for the use a truck is intended for, namely hauling stuff. Frequent building projects at home, combined with helping out on my mom's farm, along with hauling of a covered utility trailer result in my need for the hauling capacities of a truck on a regular basis.
    The lack of a vehicle with the same capabilities that gets better gas mileage has forced me to admit that my best choice is to spend the money needed to keep this current truck on the road.
    If someone could come out with a reasonably priced retrofit kit to make it a plug in electric, I'd be ecstatic.

  22. JMG's avatar

    JMG Posted 4:24 am
    27 Oct 2007

    Well then, I'm almost ready to buy itwith money that is almost worth something.
    (re: the oft-heard claim that "The latest Lovins Hypercar is almost ready for manufacturing.  100 mpg plugin hybrid.")

    Save the world: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 5% annually.
  23. John Fish Kurmann Posted 3:46 pm
    28 Oct 2007

    Maybe a Honda Fit?Hi, BioD. Based purely on the quality of the cars, I'd suggest a Honda Fit rather than a Toyota Yaris hatchback. Though Consumer Reports ranks the Yaris hatch and Fit as the 2 most reliable small cars (in that order), they also say the Yaris didn't perform well during their handling test and "stops are very long without the optional [antilock braking system]." Consumer Reports recommends the Fit but not the Yaris.
    In addition, the Yaris is very much an economy car, with lots of cost-cutting choices made in its design and the interior materials used. The Fit uses higher-quality interior materials and has an extremely versatile and roomy interior design for a subcompact car, it's a 4-door rather than a 2-door hatch, and it comes with side and side-curtain airbags (which would be very important should you be unfortunate enough to be plowed into from the side by a mammoth SUV or truck) plus antilock brakes standard (both of which are only optional on the Yaris). And the Fit does have electric power steering, so your electrifying dream is still potentially realizable.
    Downsides: The Fit's base price is $2,650 more than the base price for the Yaris hatch, though I've read that it's really hard to find a base Yaris and, if you do, it won't have side airbags and antilock brakes; add those and the price gap will narrow. Also, the Fit's EPA fuel economy rating is 1 MPG less combined city/highway than the Yaris's. If you wait a year, a redesigned Fit is supposed to hit the market that's supposed to be more fuel-efficient.
    For those who've argued it makes more ecological sense to repair your old beater or buy used rather than buy a brand-new car, this blog post from the Union of Concerned Scientists explains when that's not true.
    Also, here are some studies which explored automotive lifecycle energy use:


    "Automobiles: Manufacture Vs. Use" by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (only a summary)
    "Energy and Emission Effects of the Vehicle Cycle" by researchers at the Center for Transportation Research of Argonne National Labs (unfortunately, it doesn't appear to be available for free)
    "On the Road in 2020: A life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies" by researchers at MIT


    Smog-forming air pollutant emissions are another consideration, of course, and new cars typically do a much better of controlling these pollutants than older cars do.
    And, if you're not in too much of a rush, you might be able to find a used Fit or Yaris hatch, eliminating worries about being responsible for the energy use and toxic chemical releases due to new car manufacture.

    The world is sacred, and I am part of it.
  24. John Fish Kurmann Posted 1:07 pm
    29 Oct 2007

    IF......you can find a Yaris hatch that has no options other than the side and side curtain airbags plus the antilock brake system, those safety features apparently will add $950 to the Yaris base price of $11,300. You might have a tough time finding one without any option packages, though.
    If you look into the Fit, be aware that the Sport trim level's MSRP is $15,270 compared to the base trim level at $13,950, the latter being the version I compared to the Yaris in my previous comment. That $1,320 buys you a nicer audio system, a body kit of plastic pieces stuck on the car to make it appear more sporty (I think they look cheesy), and a few upscale features. Unfortunately, the base trim is apparently harder to find than the Sport trim.

    The world is sacred, and I am part of it.
  25. John Fish Kurmann Posted 1:50 pm
    29 Oct 2007

    IF......you can find a Yaris hatch that has no options other than the side and side curtain airbags plus the antilock brake system, those safety features apparently will add $950 to the Yaris base price of $11,300. You might have a tough time finding one without any option packages, though. Here in the Greater KC area, Yarises with the side airbags and ABS options are hard to find, though maybe things are different in Seattle.  
    If you look into the Fit, be aware that the Sport trim level's MSRP is $15,270 compared to the base trim level at $13,950, the latter being the version I compared to the Yaris in my previous comment. That $1,320 buys you a nicer audio system, a body kit of plastic pieces stuck on the car to make it appear more sporty (I think they look cheesy), and a few upscale features. Unfortunately, the base trim is apparently harder to find than the Sport trim.
    Honda also has plans to introduce a dedicated hybrid model (instead of a hybrid version of one of their conventional cars) that will be a small family car priced under the current Prius and Civic Hybrid yet projected to go farther on a gallon of gasoline than either. No production date has been announced, though, so it may not be out for a couple years.

    The world is sacred, and I am part of it.
  26. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 2:37 pm
    06 Nov 2007

    I've been kinda busy lately folksThis has all been great advice. I actually stumbled on a Honda Fit tonight. Seems to me that if I am going to build an electric plug-in, then one with four doors would be less vulnerable to critics. But, it weighs an extra 160 lbs which is like carrying a person around with you all the time. This will require about six extra Dewalt batteries and the cost associated with them. So, as with airplane design, weight becomes a major design parameter.
    The Prius is a computer on wheels. You stomp two pedals and aim it. The car I am planning to build would resemble an airplane cockpit inside. You would decide when to kill or start the internal combustion engine. You would decide when to flip the electric motor into regeneration mode to slow down. I envision controlling regeneration braking with a lever similar to the throttle controls in a plane. The ICE would turn off and on with a single switch. Somebody find me a sponsor so I can get paid to do this....

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  27. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 3:02 pm
    06 Nov 2007

    Also, Joe sent me this advice"Just wondering, since you live in Seattle, if you've considered joining Flexcar and getting around the whole ownership dilemma. They have Toyota Tacomas, Honda Elements, minivans, Honda Fits, Scion xBs, convertibles, the hybrids - pretty much any type of vehicle for a given use. For that occasional trip out to your property (if it would involve a lot of time), rental could probably fill that gap. http://www.flexcar.com/CarsLocations/VehicleInformation/t ... Default.aspx Between insuring and titling a vehicle, it's probably at minimum 500-600 dollars a year to own anything before it's even used. So I would see that as a baseline economic tradeoff point when considering an old beater versus carsharing.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement