How to diversify environmentalism?

The movement’s greatest challenge is its own lack of diversity 8

The following is a guest essay by Marcelo Bonta. Marcelo is founder and director of the Center for Diversity & the Environment and the Young Environmental Professionals of Color. He is also a senior fellow with the Environmental Leadership Program and a member of the advisory board of the Orion Grassroots Network.

-----

Marcelo BontaHow Do We Diversify?

Diversifying the environmental movement is one of the greatest challenges we face this century. Not only is it the right thing to do, but the movement needs to keep up with the rapidly changing demographics of the U.S. if it is to remain effective. Today, people of color in the U.S. amount to over 100 million people (about one third of the population), and by 2050, their numbers will more than double, growing to almost 220 million (over 50 percent of the population). People of color already constitute a majority of the population in California, New Mexico, Hawaii, and Texas.

The political and social implications of an increasingly diverse population and nation are vast. Communities of color have a mounting influence on society and politics, including the distribution of public finances, the way cities develop and grow, and the strength and creation of environmental laws and policies. Diversifying is not only a great challenge but also a great opportunity.

Can you imagine if the environmental movement was effective at engaging people of color and leveraging their substantial support and talents? Millions of new supporters would surely translate into more political victories for the environment, more public support, more members, a larger volunteer base, richer partnerships and more financial support. In other words, the movement would be potentially more successful and influential than it ever has been before.

Furthermore, people of color support environmental issues at a higher level than their white counterparts.

An exit poll for a 2002 California multibillion-dollar bond issue for open space protection revealed that 77 percent of African Americans, 74 percent of Latinos, 60 percent of Asians and 56 percent of Caucasians approved the measure. Another recent poll commissioned by The Nature Conservancy and Trust for Public Land showed that 77 percent of Latino voters (versus 65 percent of all voters) support a tax increase to protect water quality and open space.

This news should be encouraging, right? Yes, to a certain degree, but it also highlights a serious problem that exists in the movement. The movement continues to struggle with diversity, whether it's in outreach, collaborations, hiring and retention practices, or other facets.

Not many people of color work in the environmental movement. The Minority Environmental Leadership Development Initiative found that out of 158 environmental institutions, 33 percent of mainstream environmental organizations and 22 percent of government agencies had no people of color on staff. In another study, the Natural Resources Council of America found that people of color make up only 11 percent of the staff and 9 percent of the boards of member organizations.

Although it is concerning to see this lack of involvement of people of color, these numbers are actually symptoms of a much deeper problem. They reflect the root cause of the movement's diversity crisis -- a homogeneous, unintentionally exclusive culture that pervades most environmental institutions. [For a more detailed layout of the movement's diversity-related problems see "Diversifying the American Environmental Movement" (PDF)]

If we are to work on our diversity crisis, we will need to effectively tackle cultural change as well as a slew of other areas where we can diversify. Nothing short of a comprehensive strategy that will sufficiently address the diversity crisis and create sustainable and lasting change will do.

A Strategy to Diversify

Diversifying the movement is complex, and it will take a diversity of approaches to succeed. A comprehensive strategy for diversifying includes working on cultural change, outreach, partnerships and collaborations, recruitment, retention, leadership development, and the educational pipeline. [See "Diversifying the Conservation Movement" (PDF) for a detailed description of a comprehensive strategy].

We need to work on making the movement and our organizations attractive places to work for a diverse array of people, while also drawing out the environmental values of people of color -- especially to the point of pursuing an environmental career. In order for diversity efforts to succeed, it is absolutely crucial for leaders to view diversity as a top priority, and to commit resources (i.e., money and staff time) to the effort. Most importantly, we all need to commit to the cause to the point of taking action. Movement-wide, we must focus on four major areas in order to initiate effective change:

  1. Seek Partnerships and Collaborations. We need to seek strategic alliances both within and outside the movement. Within the movement, we will need to work together to share information, efforts, and lessons learned about diversifying while more efficiently using resources and keeping costs down. Collaborating with each other on our diversity efforts is essential so we can move forward synergistically and grow exponentially. We also need to work across movements, including the labor, civil rights, and faith movements. We especially need to partner with groups that already effectively work with communities of color. Most importantly, these partnerships need to be based on equity, meaning all parties equally share resources, power, and decision-making responsibilities. Expanding our list of partners will extend our reach, improve our understanding, and ensure our relevance.
  2. Engage Young People. Working along the educational pipeline by providing experiences for young people of color from infancy to graduate-school age is essential to achieving a diverse environmental community for generations to come. How we engage young people today will have significant effects far into the future, since many of these same people will be our environmental leaders when people of color make up our nation's majority. Providing opportunities for youth to exercise leadership skills and voice their opinions is an effective way to engage young people. Since internships are often the entry point to environmental careers for young folks, paid internships are essential to attract students of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
  3. Connect the Generations. We need to unify the generations that are currently working within our movement, and cultivate emerging leaders of color. Experiences, wisdom, and lessons learned need to be passed from one generation to the next if we are to build upon the progress already made. Baby boomers need to identify and mentor emerging leaders who can carry the mantle forward. Likewise, young emerging leaders need to take the initiative in connecting with more experienced leaders in the movement.
  4. Create Cultural Change. Creating cultural change is the most important aspect of diversifying. Cultural change means having an inclusive, diverse mindset that translates into actions, behaviors, and attitudes that exemplify multiculturalism and equity. Transforming into a multicultural movement requires continually addressing diversity and providing workplaces where all staff feel comfortable and are attaining their true potential. Eventually institutions that become multicultural will discover that people of color will want to work for them and stay for the long term. By initiating effective cultural change, we will build a movement that is relevant to all Americans. (As the environmental movement's history has shown repeatedly, limiting diversity efforts to recruitment only, especially at entry-level positions or for support staff, will fail more often than not. To be successful and sustainable, diversity efforts need to include cultural change issues.)

So What Can You Do?

Most people that I talk to in the environmental movement agree that the lack of diversity is a problem, yet the amount of interest far outweighs the amount of action committed to the cause. Whatever the cause for apathy -- whether it's lack of time or resources, a fear of venturing into the unknown, or a passing of responsibility -- we need to get over it and start taking action. We, as a movement, have cornered ourselves into this predicament. Now we collectively need to solve it. It is imperative to begin diversifying our movement immediately and seek bold change. Simple steps from each and every one of us can take us a long way. Here is what you can do today to push forward on diversity issues:

  • Find opportunities to diversify within your spheres of influence. Figure out what you can start doing today. What organizational responsibilities do you control and have influence over? For example, if you have access to discretionary funds or control of budgets, earmark money toward diversity activities. If you work on outreach, learn how to become culturally competent, and expand your outreach activities to include communities of color.
  • Seek opportunities to broaden your experience, expand your network and continue learning. Attend or organize diversity workshops, sessions, and trainings, which are becoming common at environmental conferences. Become involved in efforts that bring a broad range of organizations and people together, such as the Diverse Partners for Environmental Progress series of national summits and regional roundtables. Reach out to and learn from organizations that work on diversity issues, such as Environmental Learning for Kids. Numerous diversity resources can be found on the websites of organizations, including the resources section of the Center for Diversity & the Environment. The book Diversity and the Future of the U.S. Environmental Movement is one of the premier resources on the topic.
  • Find allies. Talk to others at your workplace and to people working on diversity issues outside your organization. Organize a lunch discussion about diversity issues at your workplace. Find or create a network of people with which you can comfortably discuss diversity issues. For example, a group in Portland, Ore., aptly named the Young Environmental Professionals of Color, meets monthly to network, strategize, and discuss various environmental topics that affect them.
  • Broaden your thought processes. Think long-term with an expansive vision. Constantly question your "business as usual." Ask yourself questions like "For whom am I protecting these lands or waterways? When thinking of the communities or constituencies I serve, who do I think of? Who should I think of? What type of people would find working at my workplace appealing or not appealing? Why?"
  • Engage leaders at your workplace and foundations. Talk to leaders about adopting diversity as an organizational priority and taking action. Ask for a commitment of resources, especially money and staff time. Lack of funding devoted to diversity severely limits the scope for diversifying the movement. Ask your funders to provide grants for diversity efforts.
  • Start building relationships with communities and organizations of color now. If you want to start engaging people of color, you will need to invest time building relationships and trust, and provide something of value. You will need to do your homework about the community members, meet them, and speak to their environmental values.

Every situation is different and will require a unique strategy. For effective efforts, environmental entities need to conduct a diversity assessment and develop a diversity action strategy specific to their workplace. A number of organizations and consultants can point you in the right direction, such as the Kenian Group and DR Works. And the Center for Diversity & the Environment website provides information about efforts, organizations, people, research, and strategies that are diversifying the movement.

As the nation continues to diversify, the environmental movement faces one of the greatest challenges of this century. Will we diversify so that we can be successful and relevant for generations to come, or will we ignore our diversity problem and continue to compartmentalize ourselves into a continually irrelevant and ineffective movement that only appeals to homogeneous elites? I don't think it's a choice anymore. Diversifying is essential to creating a healthy, influential, and sustainable movement.

The environmental movement has overcome immense problems and has achieved great feats in the past. There is no reason why we can't be up to the task again. The first and most important step is to start taking action.

So what do you plan on doing today?

For more on this topic, read Diversity and the Future of the U.S. Environmental Movement and "Diversifying the Conservation Movement" (PDF) by Marcelo Bonta and Charles Jordan (published in the Land Trust Alliance's Special 25th Anniversary Issue: A Report on the Future of Land Conservation in America.)

Erik Hoffner is the coordinator of the Orion Grassroots Network which supports the work of hundreds of grassroots groups and which connects the green leaders of tomorrow with good work today via the Grassroots Jobsource. Based in Massachusetts, he is also a freelance photographer.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Jon Rynn's avatar

    Jon Rynn Posted 6:04 am
    02 Jan 2008

    Need to connect to wider movementAs I have argued before, it seems to me that if environmental groups were part of a larger movement of economic justice, that such a movement would be attractive to those who are concerned about the environment as well as those who are concerned about pulling hispanic and african-american communities out of poverty and neutralising racism.
    This is why the work of Van Jones is important, as he is attempting to link movements by pushing for green collar jobs, that is,  jobs that work to solve our environmental problems, such as retrofitting houses and installing solar panels, while at the same time offering good jobs to the poor and peoples of color.  This work needs to be strengthened and broadened to transform the economy into something sustainable and just.
    I think that until the environmental goal of creating a sustainable economy is integrated with the goal of creating jobs in all of our communities, building diversity in the environmental movement will be difficult.  In other words, we need to have an environmental-african-american-hispanic-american (and add more communities here) movement, not just  an environmental one.
  2. GreenMom Posted 7:33 am
    02 Jan 2008

    Exactly right, Jon

    A green technology boom is building in this country, and should be a focus of both public and private investment (state and local gov't especially right now, Google, etc...)  
    If we can make arguments for that investment that focus on jobs, growth, keeping or bringing back the technical and manufacturing edge to this country, and employing our workers, then we'll build support so much more quickly.

  3. Erik Hoffner's avatar

    Erik Hoffner Posted 10:35 am
    02 Jan 2008

    economy, but health, tooYes, it's an important aspect, connecting with the economy. Which is why I'm glad to also have on my board of advisors with Marcelo the director of United for a Fair Economy. These folks are drawing all of the sorts of connections you envision in ways quite complementary to Van Jones: http://www.faireconomy.org
    Another piece not mentioned is the connection with health. Environmental health is an axis even more important than the economic one.
    Erik

    The Orion Grassroots Network: 1,100+ grassroots groups working for conservation & more

  4. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 2:41 pm
    02 Jan 2008

    How To Diversify Gargantuan Evil Corporations

    You know, you guys have been railing against the "evil corporations" ever since I was an undergraduate in Princeton.  I lived in a house with some hardcore vegetarians.  
    I used to say to them: go, get an MBA...join an insurance firm...rise to the top via scraping and executive backstabbing...then change the world.
    They rather beat the drums and chant.   Kind of like Grist.

    My Log
  5. Tasermons Partner Posted 3:54 pm
    02 Jan 2008

    The ends...I used to say to them: go, get an MBA...join an insurance firm...rise to the top via scraping and executive backstabbing...then change the world.
    That sounds awfully close to sounding like the ends justify the means...which is how much of the environment got to be in such a sorry state to begin with.
  6. Erik Hoffner's avatar

    Erik Hoffner Posted 2:58 am
    03 Jan 2008

    DR WorksDR Works is having a training soon that'd be helpful for diversity efforts:
    http://www.dismantlingracism.org/trainings.html

    The Orion Grassroots Network: 1,100+ grassroots groups working for conservation & more

  7. egret123 Posted 8:18 am
    04 Jan 2008

    Making environmental issues relevantMarcelo and Jon's points are both critical to how to make environmental issues more relevant to the vast majority of people, not just people of color, in this country. It is especially true for people of color though, that in order to resonate, environmental issues must be relevant to people with limited job opportunities, poor access to health care and unequal access to a good education.
    Marcelo has laid out an excellent framework for how to start  doing this at the broadest scale. Jon's reference to Van Jones and Green for All (http://www.greenforall.org/) is an excellent example of linking specific environmental concerns (energy production, climate change) with economic concerns for people of color.
  8. brigitte Posted 2:58 am
    05 Jan 2008

    money is a factorI have been a huge fan of the Apollo Alliance and Van Jone's for their efforts to make environmental issues relevant for more people, especially poor people of color, but I also think that it is important for mainstream conservation and environmental organizations not to assume that all people of color are poor.
    We need to look not only at the shifting population dynamics in this country with increasing numbers of people of color, but the buying power of these communities, which has grown disproportionately more than the buying power of the white community over the past few years. This is an important point because historically mainstream conservation orgs have targeted a tiny select pool of high end wealthly folks as their major donors, constituents and members.
    This phenomenon IS beginning to change from being an exclusively white man's world. While it is true that there are many communities of color in this country that are poor, there is simultaneously a growing number of people of color who are becoming strong financial powerhouses. Bill Gates is no longer the richest man in the world, for example. He has been surpassed by Carlos Selim, from Mexico. I think this may be another important angle to take in advancing diversity issues within these organizations.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement