Tom Friedman talks up the need for an ‘energy revolution’ on ‘Meet the Press’ 5

Comments View as Flat

1. 

   hapa Posted 6:46 am
   08 Sep 2008

   tom is weirdused to be the world was flat because it was economically integrated. now it's flat because there is growing economic equity (meeting in the middle) among the bourgeoisies. well, as long as it's flat. maybe next time it will be flat because it has run over a nail and needs replacing.
   i know the crowd will probably like it, as a step from "energy independent" toward some kind of resource management truth, but the "earth race" thing gives me ugly shivers.
   there's a couple ways i can imagine such a winner-take-all thing resulting in no prize.
   the world is flat but can't cooperate. can't see past its nose. so why would such a world compete to save itself? tom is his own counterargument.

   Permalink

2. 

   infp Posted 7:40 am
   08 Sep 2008

   EquivocationNotice how Brokaw feels compelled to observe that both the Democrats and the Republicans have neglected the global warming issue. To point out that the Republicans have been far worse on this issue might make Brokaw appear to be (gasp!) "partisan."  As long as the mainstream press believes in this type of equivocation the American public will remain ignorant.  
   
   

   Permalink

3. 

   ConsumeLessofIt Posted 8:50 am
   08 Sep 2008

   Do it for the kidsI agree with most of what Tom said.  Regardless of whether "global warming" is real or not we need to take the next step in energy technology.  We can't continue living at the expense of the natural world.  The sooner new alternatives are discovered the better off we will all be.  The current generation might be able to scrape by living as we do today, but there is no way future generations will be able to consume as many resources as we do without suffering dire consequences.  
   Now the question becomes how do we convince the majority of the population that change is necessary?
   
   Cheers!
   
   Stu
   
   www.ConsumeLessofIt.com

   Permalink

4. 

   gmobus Posted 11:48 am
   08 Sep 2008

   Innovation in IT - Moore's lawI wonder if Tom realizes that the analogy doesn't really work. In this country we are so used to bigger faster better in IT that we have a tendency to believe it applies to all invention.
   In a sense, computers and telecomm are antithetical to power production. Moore's law is a kind of neg-second law of thermodynamics. Unfortunately in the world of energy conversion and storage bigger isn't necessarily better.
   Where exactly does he believe these innovative ideas are going to come from?
   I know this isn't the message the growth-economy crowd wants to hear, but you should save your money, don't buy Tom's book and spend it on a physics book on thermodynamics. You'll understand reality a lot better for it.
   George
   
    
   
   George Mobus,
   
   Associate Professor, Institute of Technology,
   
   University of Washington Tacoma,
   
   and Professional Student for Life

   Permalink

5. 

   Jason D Scorse Posted 11:55 am
   08 Sep 2008

   Friedman nailed it....he was 100000 times better than Gore and is exactly the right spokesman for the cause. And this coming from someone who never really liked him all that much....until now.
   
   We need to focus on the root causes of problems.

   Permalink