Forty years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was in Memphis, where he was assassinated, to help support the long struggle of the city's sanitation workers for decent jobs and dignity. He was also speaking out against the Vietnam War, organizing a Poor People's March on Washington, and crafting an Economic Bill of Rights, calling for massive government jobs programs to rebuild America's cities. In Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community, the last book he released before he was killed, he wrote:
There is a need for a radical restructuring of the architecture of American society ... For the evils of racism, poverty and militarism to die, a new set of values must be born. Our economy must become more person-centered than property-and profit-centered. Our government must depend more on its moral power than on its military power. Let us, therefore, not think of our movement as one that seeks to integrate the Negro into all the existing values of American society. Let us be those creative dissenters who call our beloved nation to a higher destiny.
Today, the struggles for economic and racial justice must merge with the struggle to stop global warming. Its worst effects will be visited on the poor, and the great economic opportunity a clean energy future offers should be shared fairly with them. Equal protection and equal opportunity was what King demanded in the 1960s. We should be demanding the same today.
As Congress prepares a giant Economic Stimulus package -- up to $150 billion in emergency spending -- and George W. Bush suggests that it be more tax cuts for the rich, there is no better way to honor Dr. King's memory and continue his struggle than to demand that Congress offer stimulus that is green and economically just. Click here to send a message to your member of Congress:
In considering your economic stimulus package, please work to ensure that all proposed tax cuts and direct spending promote a clean energy economy and opportunities for poor and working class people. Through strategic investments in energy efficiency, mass transit and a Clean Energy Corps, we can not only avoid short-term recession, but also put hundreds of thousands of people to work and create a secure economic and environmental future for all Americans.
An ad hoc group of leaders from Van Jones of Green for All to Gillian Caldwell from 1Sky to Joel Rogers from the Center for State Innovation and Jessy Tolkan from the Energy Action Coalition has been working to develop more forward-thinking ideas for stimulus and pressure key members of Congress to build them into the plan. They could use your support.
Comments View as Flat
Jon Rynn Posted 6:40 am
21 Jan 2008
Some words from Dr. King.
I thought I would take the opportunity to post some of Dr. King's speech that he made April 4, 1967, at the Riverside Church in New York City, because I think that they are relevant today. When he talks about war in the speech, I think we can easily substitute war and environmental destruction, as in this line:
The next sentence is also very relevant in these times of economic and environmental uncertainty:
The speech is often referred to as "breaking the silence", taken from the next section:
.Finally, I want to quote from the next lines, which inspire hope:
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 7:10 am
21 Jan 2008
God bless America!
This is a wonderful post. And thanks, Jon, for the excellent quotes from the address by MLK at the Riverside Church.
Here, in the same tradition, is a fine piece by NYTimes columnist Bob Herbert:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/19/opinion/19herbert.html
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 7:27 am
21 Jan 2008
Yes, cc, that was a great Herbert piece
Permalink
odograph Posted 7:31 am
21 Jan 2008
Stimulus
I grant that a stimulus might be necessary, a lesser evil, but this article explains the spot we are in:
It would be nicer if we were "starting" this stimulus from a less debt-ridden state.
Permalink
WWAGD?! Posted 7:34 am
21 Jan 2008
Some folks like the tax cuts
Uh.
Well, maybe you should ask the founder of BET how he feels about tax cuts for the rich...before you go rushing around putting them down.
http://www.businessweek.com/mediacenter/video/careers/FEE ...
Or, you could ask Oprah
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2005/54/O0ZT.html
The list goes on and on...but you wouldn't know that since you haven't been paying attention since 1970...
Viva la Climate Resistance!
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 8:37 am
21 Jan 2008
See also:
This great letter in the NYT.
grist.org
Permalink
odograph Posted 8:53 am
21 Jan 2008
public works
The problem with public works projects is that they tend to live on. After all, we agree that they have merit outside stimulus.
The trick with stimulus is doing something abrupt, something that will jolt the economy, without building in more "structural debt" in future years.
Bush's brief plea to extend his tax cuts failed this test, which is why Bernanke spoke up, and put they kibosh on that. Bush built too much structural debt, and that might actually be a reason to fear that stimulus will even work. It comes AFTER a long span of cheap money and deficit spending.
Basically I approve of public works to improve ecology and sustainability, but they have to be done as part of a good long term budget.
Permalink
Colin Wright Posted 10:30 am
21 Jan 2008
A green stimulus can be long-term valuable...
Accorrding to Dean Baker, Bush is caught between a rock and a hard place. He despises handouts to the poor and middle-class, but he is worried about his legacy (a failed economic as well as foreign policy). Thus, the Democrats are in a good place to forward their agenda. Given the extended energy crunch we are in, they would do well to follow Baker's recommendations here:
Permalink
odograph Posted 10:58 am
21 Jan 2008
6-9 months
That's how long it should take to complete and close a stimulus plan.
(Assuming of course that this is merely a recession.)
Permalink
Tom Athanasiou Posted 11:37 pm
21 Jan 2008
Yes, yes, yes...
And don't forget to draw the larger conclusion as well, one that should be, but is not, obvious -- the urgent condition of rich/poor politics in the US will make it quite impossible for us, as a nation, to rise to the climate challenge unless progressive (as in "progressive taxation") approaches come to take center stage.
-- toma
Tom Athanasiou toma@ecoequity.org
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:01 am
22 Jan 2008
Oil dropping
Now if we had a real government, gasoline prices at the pump would come down with it. That would bail the economy out.
But we have oil company and OPEC lobbyists, bush/cheney in charge. Oil stocks are plunging. Bushco won't act to force monopolists to lower gas prices.
It won't matter what kind of stimulus for big oil and tax breaks for multimillionaiers bushco passes through the rubber stamp congress now. BTW, anyone on a pension or social security, the fed just took cash to bail out megabankers that enable hedge fund thievery right out of your survival money.
Finally duuhbya faithfulls are getting some punishment for their moronic stupidity. But everyone else will suffer along with them. Except the hedge fundies shorting this disaster.
And now regulation is almost impossible. Any hint of that and the people holding the mortgage on US all, foreclose. Period. The smart money is already squirreled away in Swiss banks.
This is what it looks like when "free" markets rule, get used to it. Hoovervilles will be called Bushbergs during this depression? The fed can't lower interest rates beyond zero.
The closer they get to zero, the less effect anything they do will have. "Free" market freefall. You liked that corporatarian propaganda, it sounds so good. Let the private sector do it. Well they are doing it alright. How does it feel?
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink