Hollywood producer Raul Julia-Levy's current project involves an impressive cast ranging from Johnny Depp, Lindsay Lohan, and Harrison Ford to Elton John, 50 Cent, and Plácido Domingo. He's attracted high-powered producers including Cameron Crowe, Ed Elbert, and Ron Howard. It's a veritable A-list role call, and he's still recruiting.
But the brightest star in Julia-Levy's lineup -- and no doubt the biggest, at 7,000 pounds -- is Lolita, a 40-year-old killer whale living in a 20-foot-deep tank at the Miami Seaquarium.
Taken from her family while still a juvenile, Lolita has been performing for sunburnt tourists twice a day over the last 37 years. The tank she lives in is just four times her size at its widest; she'd have to circle it more than 600 times to travel the same distance her still-wild family members might in an average day. Her only companion -- another killer whale from her pod, or family group -- died 20-some years ago after repeatedly bashing his own head against the enclosure walls. In her native Pacific Northwest waters, whales like Lolita have lifespans similar to humans; in a tank, that life expectancy is cut in half.
Raul Julia-Levy
Courtesy Raul Julia-Levy
"The conditions that she lives in are barbaric," Julia-Levy shouts to me over the phone, unable to contain his anger. He decided to get involved in the campaign to free Lolita last year, when he learned that it was in need of star power. But as spokesperson for the glittery troops he's amassed, Julia-Levy -- the son of Addams Family actor Raul Julia -- emphasizes that he and the other Lolita-loving producers and celebrities are involved as regular citizens, not activists.
"We are people who have consciences," he says, "and everyone in this campaign from Hollywood has a mind of their own, and we believe that what we're doing is the right thing simply because animals should live in their normal habitat."
Their fight is not a new one. In fact, activists have been trying for years to convince the Seaquarium to retire Lolita -- at times, offering up to $1 million for her release. She made national television in 1995 when Dateline NBC played a recording of her pod's vocalizations and viewers watched the whale cozy up to the speaker and listen. In 2003, a documentary about Lolita, Slave to Entertainment, hit film festivals across the country, garnering more attention for the cause. But only in the last few months has the campaign begun to gain momentum again, making news as more and more big names join up.
Julia-Levy's passion for this campaign was evident just a few moments into our conversation -- and his fervor shows no signs of waning. When asked what's next, he hinted at a plan "involving a 'big stick,'" but said he couldn't elaborate just yet. No doubt when he does, he'll have plenty of star power behind him.
How did you first hear about Lolita and get involved in the campaign?
I knew about Lolita for a long time, but it was probably about a year ago when I really got involved with the campaign. I was actually a little depressed because my little dog had just died -- he was 9 years old. It was a very tough time for me, and I was looking at pictures of my dog on the internet and then I came across ... [a video] of Lolita and the conditions of where she lives. And I got even more depressed.
Then I did a little bit of research on the situation and I contacted the Keiko Foundation, which is [under the umbrella of] the Earth Island Institute. They're the ones that have the vast experience relocating animals to their natural habitat -- like Keiko [the star of Free Willy] and Springer.
Who all is on board so far?
The latest one to join the campaign is Elton John. We have some of the most powerful producers on board: Jonathan Sanger, Ed Elbert, Richard Donner (who was behind the Keiko campaign and was extremely instrumental in the release of Keiko), David Permut, Steve Longi. We have a wide range of celebrities, too, including Johnny Depp, 50 Cent, [Hayden Panettiere, Lindsay Lohan, Plácido Domingo, Janet Jackson, Ringo Starr], Harrison Ford ... the list is pretty extensive.
We really just want to send the right message. We want people to educate themselves and to learn and know that it is not possible for an animal of that magnitude, that large, that in her normal habitat is used to traveling long distances -- at least 80 to 150 miles a day -- to be confined in a small, little tank, day after day, night after night for the past 30-something years. That's not normal. That animal needs to go back to her normal habitat.
What does it say about our culture that it wasn't until these famous faces got attached to the campaign that people started to pay attention?
Unfortunately, in our society nobody listens to your next-door neighbor when he raises his voice. ... When celebrities speak loud and stand up, it seems like everybody listens, it seems like everybody takes it more seriously, and I don't understand why normal people do not do the same thing ... This is work that we all have to do as citizens. We all have to raise our voices when something is not right. Why do we have to wait for celebrities to raise their voices first?
Is it the responsibility of celebrities then -- because they are influencing the public this way -- to research these organizations and get involved?
I think it's everybody's issue ... every citizen in this country has the same responsibility as any celebrity in Hollywood. Everybody should be responsible for taking care of our environment, our water, our animals. This responsibility belongs to everyone.
The bed we're gonna be sleeping in tomorrow, we're making it today.
What do you say to the argument that Lolita shouldn't be moved?
Lolita in nets during her capture.
Courtesy Raul Julia-Levy
Those who oppose this are extremely arrogant. Who are they to say that animals cannot be relocated? If you put a person in a cage for 30 years and you ask him to choose -- "Do you want to get out of that cage or do you want to stay there?" -- what do you think he's going to say? He's gonna say he wants to get out of that cage. Unfortunately, animals cannot speak. That's why we need to speak for those animals who cannot speak for themselves.
For those who say, "Oh, the animal is happy here because we love him," it's completely erroneous. Animals need to be loved by humans -- but in their normal habitat. Meaning: Respected. We need to respect their habitat; we need to respect their privacy; and we need to respect their freedom.
I don't want to love animals in captivity; I want to let them go. And this animal surely deserves to go back to her family, to her normal habitat. This animal has paid the highest price of her life: Being confined to a cage for 37 years. I can tell you 100 percent that animal cannot wait for the day to come that she's going to be free.
Speaking of raising voices -- tell me about the benefit concert. Is that still in the works?
It's part of our plans to put on a benefit concert -- absolutely. We want to do it in Miami, a couple of blocks from the Seaquarium. We're planning a series of events.
But right now, our team is in the process of negotiations with the Seaquarium. We will try every single diplomatic road to resolve this situation properly for both parties. This has to be a winning situation for both parties.
I think [Seaquarium owner Arthur] Hertz should really think about this because he's got a whale that's not going to live more than five years in that tank. And he can come out of this one looking like a hero. It's up to him. But like I said, our team is putting together a diplomatic plan to negotiate the situation, make both parties win, and do the right thing.
So that's the first step ... and if that doesn't work?
Then the campaign goes to a whole new level ...
More power, less roadkill: How one professor’s landscape has shifted
Climate Citizen: Mary Stuart Masterson
Comments
View as Flat
caniscandida Posted 4:57 am
04 Apr 2008
It is hard to know what to expect, in the case of Lolita. Nevertheless, it is harder to refute Raul Julia-Levy's basic argument, that liberation from captivity will surely be a good thing for her.
Notice the connexion between Raul's love for his little dog, and his concern for Lolita. It often happens that way, that our companion animals sharpen our interest in all animals, including wildlife.
Permalink
L25kin Posted 1:44 pm
06 Apr 2008
In Lolita's clan, all offspring stay by their mother's side for life. She still calls out in the unique dialect used only by her family.
That's how we know she will be recognized.
Raul has breathed new life into the campaign by making the point along with powerful celebrities that Lolita deserves the chance to return home. Our research on her orca community over the past three decades tells us that Lolita could be safely relocated to her native habitat and she would thrive in the place where she was raised.
Lolita has been well cared for and is in excellent health, but orcas may be the most socially bonded species known to science, and Lolita has been confined to a tiny tank without any orca company for far too long.
Howard Garrett
Lolta Come Home campaign
Proposal to Retire Lolita
Letter to supporters of Lolita's retirement
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 5:14 pm
06 Apr 2008
What is the "Southern Resident orca community"?
Permalink
L25kin Posted 2:16 am
07 Apr 2008
There are three pods in the community, called J, K and L pods, each made up of several matrilines. At the most recent survey there were 87 orcas in total in the community. They return every spring to the inland waters of Washington State and British Columbia, and in the winter have been seen from Monterey, California to northern British Columbia.
Before she was captured, Lolita lived for about three years as a member of this clan. By the vocal calls she still makes to this day we know she was born into the L25 matriline. Orcas mature and catch their own fish before the age of two, and their memory retention is astounding, so with lifetime bonding of family members it is believed that she still remembers her family and the habitat she was removed from, and how to catch fish.
Permalink
Catwoman Posted 6:26 am
07 Apr 2008
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 6:34 am
07 Apr 2008
I am not sure that the Keiko Foundation is quite justified to say that resident orcas are the MOST socially complex of all non-human animals -- there are other cetaceans, and elephants too, for example, who exhibit remarkably close and long-lasting familial/social relationships. But I have no doubt that orcas are definitely up there. And I think you and Raul are certainly justified to feel confident, that Lolita would be recognized by her pod, and be successfully and happily reunited with them.
By the way, there was a curious story, a couple of years ago, about a new-born orca, in a pod that was in the body of water that separates Vancouver Island from the mainland, of whom it was alleged that he was the reincarnation (?) of a recently deceased Kwakiutl leader. For a while, I recall, some of the tribesmen were paddling out to the orcas to greet the baby and spend time with him. But then, the story got dropped from the media. Is there any news about that orca?
Permalink
L25kin Posted 8:43 am
07 Apr 2008
You have a good point that other species are also extremely socially bonded. The thing about orcas, or at least in some orca communities, is that both male and female offspring stay right with their mothers for life. So we have 45-year old males alongside their 65-year old mothers, along with her sisters and the whole matriline, every time we see them. If you see one the rest of the family can't be far away. Elephants certainly live according to learned cultures and are self-aware, but the social bonds are not quite as tight as in orcas. When male elephants reach maturity they tend to move off and return only rarely, with mating on the mind.
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 2:33 pm
07 Apr 2008
Michael Parfit sounds like a very wise and sensitive person. He must have been devastated.
The documentary that is referred to in that article in the Victoria paper, "Saving Luna," does not seem to be generally available yet in this country. But there is another movie, "Luna: Spirit of the Whale," starring Adam Beach and Jason Priestley, which I have put in my Netflix cue.
Permalink
krlk27 Posted 12:12 am
08 Apr 2008
Permalink
ccdangelo Posted 2:38 pm
08 Apr 2008
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 6:15 pm
08 Apr 2008
Thanks for your interesting perspective, CCDAngelo. The captivity and the confinement of animals are always delicate ethical issues. Although I am a promoter of animal rights, I part company with those animal-rightsists who think captivity and confinement are always evil. In many cases, always depending on the circumstances, animals may be benefited by confinement.
Captive breeding programs are tricky: definitely an area where environmentalist ethics and animal-rights ethics can collide. But not necessarily. So far as I can tell, the cheetahs at the National Zoo in DC are doing OK.
And it certainly was justified to collect as many Central American treefrogs as possible, in the past couple of years, to save them, and their entire species, from being killed by the chytrid fungus, for example in the Amphibian Ark program.
With large, sensitive, intelligent animals such as orcas and elephants, we always have to ask if they have enough space, if their environment is satisfactory, and if they are lonely. Elephants need much more space than most zoos provide; and young ones and females need companionship, preferably that of their female relatives. The recent movement to liberate them from zoos and circuses and send them to spacious refuges, where they can be with other elephants, is to be welcomed, even if those conditions are not totally natural.
The orcas in aquariums are like that, and if anything even more so. When we keep an aquarium, we are indeed supposed to care for the animals whom we put into it, but even more basically, we have to care for and maintain that small body of water which we have collected. Our first duty is always to keep that water clean and healthful. That sometimes is a yucky task; and when we consider the situation of marine mammals confined in aquariums, the yuckiness factor enters in. So Lolita and other orcas should definitely be released. So probably should intelligent marine carnivores such as sea lions and polar bears too.
(Berlin's famous Knut, well loved here in Grist, is perhaps OK where he is, so long as they give him space and keep him entertained; he certainly should not have been put to death, as some animal-rightsists oddly called for; but neither can he be sent to the Arctic.)
By the way, on whether "Jesus was a tree-hugger": I commend you on the theme of your blog, and I wish you every success. But as a heterodox progressive trinitarian universalist anti-biblicist Catholic Christian, I doubt that assertion; and, more important, in general I think the historical Jesus is very boring. He seems to have shared many of the unscientific and unquestioned prejudices of his contemporary Jews, and so I am not sure that we have much to learn from him. He is NOT an authority for us. The Gospel of Jesus Christ itself, on the other hand, which includes the Gift of the Holy Spirit to the Church, is much greater and more beautiful than anything that the historical Jesus, as a limited man of his time and place, ever said or did. He becomes much more interesting as an opponent and critic of contemporary Jewish and Greco-Roman traditions; but even then, we need the Church and the Holy Spirit to evaluate what exactly his opposition meant.
Permalink