In this post, David echoes what seems to be conventional eco-wisdom on high gas prices:
It's good that gas prices are rising. We want people to buy more fuel-efficient cars and drive less.
I'm not so certain.
Sure, high prices will spur people to use less gas. But the incentives cut both ways: high prices also spur energy companies to produce more oil. And now that most of the world's easy-to-reach, easy-to-refine oil has already been put to the drill, high prices are making some seriously malevolent projects -- Canadian oil sands come to mind -- turn the corner from speculative boondoggles to respectable profit-centers.
My post here is way too longwinded, but eventually gets at the same point: energy companies are starting to give super-carbon-intensive projects, like shale oil and coal-based petroleum substitutes, a closer look. When oil's cheap, those sorts of things make no sense. When oil's pricey, they start to pencil out.
And more broadly, when oil prices rise, oil companies/monarchies get even richer -- which means they have even more weight to throw around. (Notice, for example, that pollutions safeguards were the first policy casualty of the latest price spike.)
Now, I'm not saying that gas should be cheaper at the pump -- and I'm with David in thinking that Americans might as well get used to paying more; there's not a whole lot that consumers can do right now, other than hope they live and work in places that don't require them to drive much.
But I am saying that enviros shouldn't think of high gas prices as a good substitute for high gas taxes. They seem like the same thing, but they're not; and I'm sure that there are plenty of oil company execs who hope that people lose sight of the distinction.
Comments
View as Flat
odograph Posted 12:09 am
28 Apr 2006
Environmentalists have the same job as always ;-), to praise the efficient and to protest the unwise.
Permalink
PBrazelton Posted 12:26 am
28 Apr 2006
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:44 am
28 Apr 2006
Coal, tar, tar sands to methane, and methane to methanol becomes economically feasible.
And this process traps all the contaminants like sulfur and mercury. But it won't cut CO 2 unless it's done with renewable energy and the CO 2 is recycled with the algae process.
Of course once it is producing fuel and natural gas no one will care anymore about CO 2. Oh well, it is a hopeless battle. No need to let it discourage. Hehehey.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
LegumeSam Posted 3:24 am
28 Apr 2006
Capitalism is faced with the exhaustion of its capacities in every theater of its operations. Increasing financial instability; increasing eco-devastation; increasing resort to violence warfare. Higher gasoline taxes? It's time to end the capitalist system before it ends us.
http://todd4senate.org/
Permalink
GRLCowan Posted 4:15 am
28 Apr 2006
That fits the pattern I see: in publically paid hands, money from high fossil fuel taxes are exactly like oil profits, except they're recession-proof; the publically paid talk as if they had no idea they had any oil and gas income, but act as if it were on their minds fairly early in the morning, fairly late in the afternoon, and at many points in between.
And they have power shepherd the rest of us into driving plenty -- for instance by control cities' layout so that lots of cross-town driving is needed -- and speeding, with frequent stops. It would be much better if the only oil and gas profits were private ones.
--- G.R.L. Cowan, former hydrogen fan
B: internal combustion, nuclear cachet
Permalink
Weeb Posted 3:29 am
01 May 2006
Second, high gas prices serve as a continual reminder to people that we need to invest in other types of renewable technologies even if they cannot power our vehicles yet. All this attention to high gas prices makes people aware that the US is overly dependant on foreign sources of energy. This type of discussion leads to more interest, investment and publicity for other renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, tidal and geothermal power.
Third, high gas prices can and have already begun to change the behavior of people. Not only are people looking to buy cars with a higher gas mileage, but there is anecdotal evidence of increased car pooling and use of mass transit. These behaviors can develop into habits thereby create a more environmentally responsible citizenry.
-Hal Connolly
Permalink
tjacorn Posted 3:43 am
01 May 2006
Thomas Friedman, author of "The World is Flat," advocated for a higher gas tax in Friday's NYTimes. Here's the link:
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/opinion/28friedman.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op
%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fThomas%20L%20Friedman
Permalink
sukumar Posted 12:22 pm
01 May 2006
Nations across the world have had higher petrol prices for decades. Sure, most of those high prices go towards taxes and some are advocating similar taxes here to curb demand. But if my neighborhood is any indication, I don't see this happening any time soon and given how this government spends my tax dollars, do I care if Lee Raymond gets a heart attack guzzling my money or Haliburton? Burn, baby, burn!
Permalink