At the annual winter meeting of the National Governors Association, which concluded Monday, state leaders revisited a previously launched initiative called "Securing a Clean Energy Future" -- and struggled with the reality that "clean energy" has very different meanings to different states. "Clean coal," in particular, was boosted by coal states and eyed with skepticism by others. In trying to hammer out energy recommendations for a new president, "We're almost 50 different opinions," lamented Alabama Gov. Bob Riley (R). Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) agreed: "[Coal] has a CO2 problem, wind has a reliability problem, solar has a price problem, nukes have a price and radiation problem. So all of those technologies have opportunities, but they all have problems." Uh, but some obviously have more problems than others. Right? Right?
The Clean's List
Governors are of varying minds when it comes to clean energy 2
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
Montana Green Posted 7:41 am
26 Feb 2008
There is no clean coal, as Sen. Harry Reid said this week, and everyone knows it. Not only is there no clean way to use coal, there definitely is no clean way to mine it. Of Montana's existing coal stripmines, only 2 percent have been fully reclaimed after more than 30 years of operation.
Coal's got problems, alright, and far too many of them are the people and corporations that continue to push for its development, ignoring the global warming reality staring us in the face.
Fossil fuels are for fossil fools.
Permalink
usandthem Posted 11:03 am
26 Feb 2008
Permalink