Giving thanks ... for links

Some leftovers to browse before T-Giving 4

I've got about 40 tabs open in my browser, and that's no way to go into a holiday weekend. Time for an old-fashioned link-fest!

-----

I never managed to say anything about it, but novelist Ian McEwan had a delightfully literary and readable essay on Obama and climate change in The Guardian. Definitely worth reading.

The Wall Street Journal has a special package on Obama's green challenge, with a focus on reducing demand in light of falling oil prices. With video!

I know Gristians got no love for biofuels, even the cellulosic variety, but this story describes some very cool research work going on in that area. I would be very surprised if some cool and environmentally benign fuel didn't come out of all this, even if its contribution is ultimately marginal.

Everybody loves reports, and here's a good one: the WWF's latest Living Planet Report is out. SPOILER ALERT: humanity is using up the earth's resources at unsustainable rates.

What's that? You want more reports? I've got 'em! Here's a good one from EDF: in a report called Carbon Counts, they call on federal agencies "to account for the societal benefit of reducing global warming pollution in their economic assessments of significant regulations." Doing so would make it clear that a great many programs now dismissed as "too expensive" are actually fiscally wise.

Live in Oregon or Washington? Don't worry, there's a report especially for you: CleanEdge recently released Carbon-Free Prosperity 2025, which looks at the regions unique strengths and lays out a path to, well, what the title says.

"More reports!" you say, "I need more!" Calm down. Try one from the Council on Competitiveness, a 100-Day Energy Action Plan for the next president that focuses on clean energy financing and electricity industry regulatory reform.

"These reports aren't dorky and wonky enough for me," you pant. "Gimme the hard stuff." Fine. Here's video from an event NDN put on called "A Vision for a Modernized Electric Grid: Clean Infrastructure for a 21st Century Economy," featuring Rep. Jay Inslee, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, grid guru Kurt Yeager, and FERC commissioner Jon Wellinghoff:

Environmentally enlightened direct-to-consumer auto insurance company (yes, Virginia, there is such a thing) Esurance has sponsored a Cloud Cult tour, and the band has made them a clever video:

If this story and this story are any indication, wave power -- harvesting energy from tides -- might turn out to be a player after all.

And solar thermal, er, baseload power is breaking out all over.

BusinessWeek takes a close look at carbon capture and sequestration, particularly in the EU, and comes to the same conclusion as so many other mainstream outlets: it's wildly expensive, therefore we need to make carbon wildly expensive so that it's competitive. The economic perversity of this argument doesn't seem to bring anyone up short, to my enduring puzzlement.

The National Intelligence Council recently released a set of three "Global Scenarios to 2025." Environmental stresses, particularly water, play a central role. I prefer "Constant Renewal," wherein:

It is grassroots pressure which forces change, with various political groups, NGOs, professional organizations and "people-in-the-street" coalescing to act as an orchestrated lobbying group on government leaders in order to force inter-governmental cooperation at a global level. On the part of the leaders, a stronger international commitment "to make the system work" develops. Environmental sustainability becomes recognized as a global priority alongside maintaining global economic growth.

Pretty cool how Better Place is looking into setting up a network of electric cars and powering stations in the Bay Area. And this sounds extremely promising:

At a press conference held in San Francisco City Hall, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, along with the Mayors of San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland, joined together with the Bay Area Council, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, and Better Place of Palo Alto to announce a sweeping plan to reinvigorate the state and region's competitive advantage in innovative technology through public-private investments in electric vehicles and other elements of "green" infrastructure. This new approach challenges conventional assumptions that economic and environmental recovery are at odds with each other, and aligns them, instead.

The group defined a vision for encouraging investment in green infrastructure as a means for boosting the state's competitive advantage while reducing its dependence on oil for transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The group believes that the move to a sustainable mobility model of electric vehicles fueled by renewable energy, beginning in the Bay area, will serve as an economic and environmental stimulus blueprint for the entire country, particularly the nation's lagging automotive sector.

Have a happy Thanksgiving!

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. JMG's avatar

    JMG Posted 5:58 am
    26 Nov 2008

    Esurance -- why no PAYD???I was excited to see a link for an environmentally enlighted direct-to-consumer auto insurance company.  I've been looking for one for years, since my company (the otherwise generally awesome USAA) has ignored my steady stream of requests for "pay as you drive" insurance that rewards the driver for driving less.
    Surely an environmentally enlightened company would offer insurance by the mile, rather than by the month ...
    Except not.  No mention of PAYD on their site anywhere.

    The 5% Project



    Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay.
  2. onetwothree Posted 7:45 am
    26 Nov 2008

    Per Cellulosic Ethanol - Home brewed alternative?Regarding the mention of cellulosic ethanol - Has anyone every discussed the possible economics and green implications of home made cellulosic ethanol?
    If individuals could get their hands on the enzymes that breakdown cellulosic materials, couldn't ethanol be made the same way the Tennessee crowd uses ethanol stills to make it now?
    Think about it, the feedstock would/could be had for free from tree branches, grass clippings, leaves, etc. and there would be no labor costs (farmers spare time), no environmental studies, no transportation costs, etc.
    I imagine the biggest challenge will be getting the enzymes, but second tier enzymes would find a market if the large commercial plants bid up the first tier enzymes.
    Even if the fermentation process was slow, who cares, it could just sit on the back of the farm and work and sooner or later put a dent it ones oil/gas bill.
    Just something to think about . . . or not?

  3. GreyFlcn Posted 2:36 pm
    26 Nov 2008

    WellHow about I toss my hat in the ring with this one.
    Looks like the oceans are worse off than we thought.

    http://digg.com/environment/Oceans_Ten_Times_More_Acidic_ ...

    -David Ahlport
  4. Whiskerfish Posted 2:13 am
    29 Nov 2008

    GE'd biofuel bugsI hope someone is worrying about what happens if super-efficient genetically-engineered buglets that break down cellulose into petroleum or diesel or ethanol get loose in the wider world... Holy moly! Talk about ecosystem collapse!
    Even if they bugs they're developing can in theory not survive outside the lab, we all know how quickly single-celled orgs mutate: Is it just a matter of time that disaster strikes?
    Whiskerfish

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement