Giuliani opposes Congressional fuel economy deal 2

rudy-drag.jpgIn a revealing interview on Meet the Press today, GOP Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said he does not support the mandated increase to 35-mpg that both the House and Senate -- and I believe even the president -- support. To quote Rudy: "That isn't the way I think it should be done."

What is his alternative strategy? Politically, as readers know, only one other alternative strategy exists: "technology, technology, technology, blah, blah, blah." Yes, Rudy wants to subsidize hybrids and biofuels -- a voluntary strategy that has failed to stop the steady decline in average fuel economy, and the steady increase in gasoline consumption, in this country since the mid-1980s.

We've already heard some dubious energy/climate policy from the Giuliani camp, but here he himself demonstrated that he just doesn't get it: In responding to Russert's question about the fuel economy deal, Rudy said we needed to build more oil refineries. Well, only if the strategy of fuel efficiency and alternative fuels fails -- which it certainly will if President Giuliani pushes his voluntary do-nothing technology strategy.

Rudy also said he wanted to push more nuclear and "clean coal" and, weirdly, "expansion of hydroelectric power." [Note to Rudy's energy advisor -- this means you, former Energy Secretary of Herrington -- we are pretty much tapped out on hydro.] He made no mention of renewables like wind or solar.

The interview is available here. The energy stuff is at the very end. I don't think he'll be the GOP nominee (though he is currently the gambler's favorite), but if he is, the interview is probably worth watching. Otherwise, not so much.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Tim Hurst's avatar

    Tim Hurst Posted 2:09 pm
    09 Dec 2007

    With all due respect......it doesn't really matter what Rudy Giuliani thinks of raising CAFE standards right now. Nor will it matter what he thinks a year from now.

    Tim Hurst



    ecopolitology.org
  2. mseall Posted 11:11 pm
    09 Dec 2007

    Can somebody enlighten meI understand most of the counter arguments to most of the climate change topics. But this one I don't get..  
    Is there any sensible reason for not implementing a 35mpg target? Especially considering that Europe and Japan achieved this years ago? I really need somebody to sit me down and explain it..
    Baffled.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement