Chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) called on the U.S. Senate yesterday to pass the stalled renewal of the National School Lunch Program known
as the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Time is running out for
the bill, with precious few working Senate days left before the election.
Sadly, Lincoln, like First Lady Michelle Obama,
can't do anything more than urge Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to
bring the bill to the floor. And if he doesn't, the whole legislative
process has to start over again when the new Congress convenes in
January.
Is there any hope left? Or has time run out for school food?
According
to my sources, Reid has indeed kept hope alive. Last night, he
began the process of finally bringing the bill up for passage in the
Senate. Unfortunately, the GOP seems intent on requiring full votes for
every intermediate legislative step -- and there are many, so each one can take days.
If
these delays continue, success for school lunch may require a
willingness by Senate Democrats to pass major legislation during the
lame duck session, i.e. after the November election, but before the
holiday recess, by which point some senators, like Lincoln for example, will likely have lost their re-election campaigns.
Still, Reid's latest move counts as progress.
Meanwhile,
the House still hasn't figured out how to pay for the funding increases
in its version of the bill -- it spends $3.5 billion more over 10 years
than the Senate version does. Since Democrats actually follow rules
that require them to pay for new spending programs, they must identify
a funding source before bringing the bill up for a final vote.
School food remains alive but in critical condition. Now might be a good time to call your representative and urge him or her to act on the bill.
The real price of cheap Walmart eggs?
This New Agtivist wants to grow food in old K-Marts
How bad are the next few years going to suck? 

Comments
Post a Comment +
In this article re: school lunch programs Michelle Obama is mentioned as though she is a legislator whose very presence will change the school cafeteria. She is the President's wife. That's it. Her association with gardening and children's health is little more than a photo-op and good PR.
The school lunch room will not be fixed, changed, improved or rescued by the Federal Government because it is an extension of the USDA which means industrial agriculture. Michelle's advocacy, like the USDA's "Know Your Farmer, Known Your Food" is another form of green washing much like the Frito-Lay traveling greenhouse or McDonald's advertising in Seattle.
The great difference is that Frito-Lay and McDonald's are paying for their PR work while we, the tax payers, foot the bill for Michelle and the USDA to promote their agenda.
Here is an example of why the cafeteria crisis will not be resolved in Washington: About 25 years ago it was decided that children should have only skim milk and other "healthy-products" in school cafeteria. A parochial school in my neighborhood lost some of their USDA funding (for school lunches) because the ladies from the parish were preparing foods that were typical of the Croatian/Slovenian community but not on the USDA approved list.
One of the ways they supported their school cafeteria was to sell ethnic dishes to the community every Friday. I used to buy a wonderful raised doughnut sprinkled with a little sugar. Two or ...read more
@lefermier I agree with you. Also, those doughnuts sound fantastic!
So many good ideas, so much money ill-spent in the federal government!
---------------
Check out my blog!
coreyrobinson.wordpress.com